1. Coronary Connector Devices: Analysis of 1,469 Anastomoses in 1,216 Patients 
Willem J.L. Suyker, MD, Cornelius Borst, MD, PhD 
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
DOI: /j.athoracsur
Copyright © 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Patency per device in all 33 studies (follow-up range, pre-discharge to 41 months). Dots represent individual studies according to Table 2.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Proximal device performance comparison, weighted mean, and 95% confidence interval, based on follow-up data up to 1.0 year, excluding pre-discharge data and increased risk studies. Symbol size is proportional to anastomosis numbers. The p values indicate the significance of the difference with the conventionally sutured reference group (upper line). The horizontal axis is logarithmic: logit x = ln [x/(1 − x)]. (SJM = St. Jude Medical.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Distal device performance comparison, weighted mean, and 95% confidence interval, based on follow-up data up to 1.0 year, excluding pre-discharge data. Symbol size is proportional to anastomosis numbers. The p values indicate the significance of the difference with the conventionally sutured reference group (upper line). The horizontal axis is logarithmic: logit x = ln [x/(1 − x)]. (MVP = Magnetic Vascular Positioner [Ventrica Inc, Fremont, CA]; SJM = St. Jude Medical.)
aOne 19-month data point included.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions