1. TED Policy
HOW WE DO IT:
Review DOD, DA, and TRADOC policy and regulatory guidance for impacts to learning development policy.
Coordinate with training and education development proponents to identify policy issues for resolution.
Synchronize and manage all policy and pamphlet development to ensure guidance is nested and development process is transparent.
Host the monthly Policy and Guidance Oversight Committee (PGOC) to engage stakeholders in the early development of policy, maintain situational awareness of policy and guidance needs, ensure changes to the Army Instruction Design process is open, transparent, and collaborative.
WHAT WE DO:
Develop and synchronize the Army’s Instruction Design process (ADDIE) across the Learning Enterprise to ensure learning products meet the needs of Army Readiness.
WHO WE ARE: (5 Army Civilians)
Mr. Patrick Zoch,
Mr. Bill Weaver,
Mr. Cliff Thurman,
Mr. Jason Heffel,
Dr. John Holden, in-bound ETA 7 JUL
WHY WE DO IT:
To establish a common process used across the Enterprise that ensures a thoughtful identification of learning requirements based on analyses, ensure focused learning on critical job performance requirements, and determine the specific objectives and assessment for learning activities. This ensures that learning products are developed efficiently and meets the needs for Army Readiness.
UNCLASSIFIED

2. TDC Functional Proponent
HOW WE DO IT:
Coordinate with TED proponents to define new TDC requirements. Coordinate the semi-annual TDC RCBs with the TDC Community and the TCM ATIS.
Host quarterly Training Managers and Developers Forums to disseminate system information and share best practices.
Review policy and regulatory guidance for impacts to TDC; help chart TED needs for the future ATIS.
Maintain TDC data tables in accordance with authoritative sources.
WHAT WE DO: Serves as the TDC Functional Proponent and assists with improving TDC for the Learning Enterprise.
WHO WE ARE: (2 Army Civilians)
Ms. Coreitha Carty,
Ms. Michelle McGowan,
WHY WE DO IT:
To sustain a high quality, user-friendly training and education development tool that supports standardized development, distribution and maintenance of training and educational products and resourcing.
TDC – Training Development Capability
TED – Training and Education Development
RCB – Requirements Configuration Board
TCM ATIS – TRADOC Capabilities Manager, Army Training Info Systems

3. Operational Learning Products
WHAT WE DO: Review all new Army operational learning products to ensure compliance with policy, standardization, and proponency.
HOW WE DO IT: Proponents submit their products through TDC to ArmyU for an outside review before they approve their products. ArmyU conducts the review and returns the product. If it is in compliance with policy, the proponent can then approve the product. If not in compliance, the proponent makes the appropriate correction(s) and re-submits to Army U for another look.
WHO WE ARE: (4 Army Civilians)
Mr. Patrick Bremser,
Mr. Brian Anderson,
Mr. Will Lallement,
Mr. Sergio Ramos,
WHY WE DO IT: IAW HQDA directives, we provide “outside eyes” for your products to ensure Soldiers receive a standardized product that looks the same throughout the Enterprise, and contributes to units’ abilities to support Army Readiness.
UNCLASSIFIED

4. Institutional Learning Products
WHAT WE DO:
As the TRADOC “lead”, revised TP to include adding updated content from TP /5/6/10 and critical elements from TP
Review lesson plans (LPs) using a quality control checklist* that is based upon
TR , TP and TP
HOW IT IS DONE:
Centers & schools route all new LPs in the Training Development Capability (TDC) to ArmyU for review during the staffing process before the LPs submitted to the approval authority. ArmyU conducts a Formal Review of these LPs.
Centers & schools, if they choose to do so, can send LPs to ArmyU for review via . ArmyU conducts a Courtesy Informal Review of these LPs. These reviews are non-attributional.
ArmyU conducts Selected Reviews of revised LPs that have already been approved with an updated change history.
TP – TRADOC Pamphlet
TR – TRADOC Regulation
WHO WE ARE: (6 Army Civilians)
Ms. Tammy Reyes,
Mr. Ross Steele,
Mr. Daryl Hinrichs,
Ms. Cheryl Masisak,
Dr. Kelvin Wilkerson,
Mr. Jeffrey Wisdom,
WHY WE DO IT: We do this to ensure LPs comply with sound lesson design, proponency, and regulatory requirements so Soldiers have the Knowledge, Skills, & Attitudes to contribute to their units’ mission for Army Readiness. (NOTE: We do not review technical content; we are not technical content SMEs.)
*TED-T site:

5. Executing Workload Management
WHAT WE DO: On an annual basis and with support from the CoEs, we develop and submit the current year production status and projected POM requests which fund the Learning Enterprise Training and Education Developers contained in the TADV MDEP.
HOW WE DO IT: We calculate available manpower (Capacity); gather, analyze and synthesize approved products from the databases; determine workload by applying Estimated Time Values and maintenance cycles (Requirements); assist Proponents in validating their workload as they identify risk and apply available manpower to their requirements.
Tasks:
1. Conduct data analysis and validation.
2. Provide written data reporting to CAC and TRADOC G-8 to inform TADV MDEP Manager funding decisions.
3. Train and educate the WM community for execution of TED WM POM and strength reporting.
Tools:
1. Strength Reporting Workbook (Capacity).
2. POM Reporting Workbook (Requirements).
WHO WE ARE: (1 Army Civilian + 3 CTRs)
Mr. Hank St-Pierre, DAC, (913)
Mr. Dennis Langston, CTR, (913)
Mr. Zaid Abdul-Rahmaan, CTR, (913)
Mr. Rick Grimes, CTR, (913)
WHY WE DO IT: To ensure that we maintain the Training Developers required to develop, review and revise the learning products used by the Enterprise to train and educate our Soldiers.
Training Development - Shaping Operations that supports Army Readiness…The Main Effort