1. PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOUSING (NATIONAL ASSEMBLY)
2ND APRIL 2003
2nd APRIL 2003
KEVIN DUNCAN VICTOR MATLOU
Kevin Duncan Victor Matlou

2. AGENDA AGENDA BACKGROUND THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA HOMES
THE NEW FUTURES
3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
QUO VADIS
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
1. BACKGROUND
THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
HOMES
3. THE NEW FUTURES
YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
5 CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
6. QUO VADIS?
7. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
- 2 -

3. Houses constructed per Province
BACKGROUND
1.1 ORIGINAL PURPOSE
To make a substantial contribution on a national basis to normalisation of the low cost housing market through the provision of appropriate “rightsizing” houses for qualifying beneficiaries.
1.2 PERFORMANCE TO DATE ( 4443 units )
Houses constructed per Province
- 3 -
BACKGROUND
1.1 ORIGINAL PURPOSE
To make a substantial contribution on a national basis to normalisation of the low cost housing market through the provision of appropriate “rightsizing” houses for qualifying beneficiaries.
1.2 PERFORMANCE TO DATE (4443 units)
(Houses constructed per Province)

4. Ineffective evictions
-4 -
1.3 PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED
R2479 “own contribution”
Ineffective evictions
In-situ rightsizing
Illegal occupations
1.3 PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED
R2479 “own contribution”
Ineffective evictions
In-situ rightsizing
Illegal occupations

5. 2. THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
HOMES
WHY “REINVENTION” AND NOT INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENT?
2.1 THE FUTURE IS NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE!
- Rightsizing potential reduced from 17000
to 11000
2.2 DOING THE SAME THING BETTER WOULD NOT GUARANTEE SUCCESS
- External factors override good planning
2.3 THE NEED TO OFFER THE DEPARTMENT A “BETTER RETURN”
- Assist with implementation of National
Priorities.
- 5 -
2. THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
HOMES
WHY “REINVENTION” AND NOT INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENT?
2.1 THE FUTURE IS NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE!
- Rightsizing potential reduced from 17000
to 11000
2.2 DOING THE SAME THING BETTER WOULD NOT GUARANTEE SUCCESS
- External factors override good planning
2.3 THE NEED TO OFFER THE DOG A “BETTER RETURN”
- assist with implementation of National
Priorities.

6. THE NEW FUTURES 3. THE NEW FUTURES
- 6 -
3. THE NEW FUTURES
“WE ARE THE FUTURE OF THE CREATION OF OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH HOUSING”
DISTINCTIVE PROGRAMMES:
3.1 RIGHTSIZING
- Servcon clients
- Aged & disabled vs waiting list
3.2 PEOPLE’S HOUSING PROCESS (PHP)
- Secondary/primary support
organisation
- Capacitate and implement for Local
Authorities
3.3 EMERGING CONTRACTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
- Requested by Department to spearhead
- In conjunction with NHBRC & NURCHA
- Women in Construction
THE NEW FUTURES
“WE ARE THE FUTURE OF THE CREATION OF OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH HOUSING”
3.1 RIGHTSIZING
- Servcon clients
- Aged & disabled vs waiting list
3.2 PEOPLE’S HOUSING PROCESS (PHP)
- Secondary/primary support organisation
- Capacitate and implement for Local
Authorities
3.3 EMERGING CONTRACTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
- Requested by Department to spearhead
- In conjunction with NHBRC --- Women in Construction

7. 3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
- 7 -
3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

8. 8 –

9. - 9 -

10. CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
- 10 -
CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
5.1 LAND
- Availability
- Cost
5.2 LEGAL
- Environmental Impact Assessment
- Deeds Office
- Surveyor General’s Office
- Illegal Occupants
- Support by SAPS for evictions
5.3 LOCAL AUTHORITIES
- Service Level Agreements
- Councillors involvement
5.4 POLICY
- R2479 ‘own contribution’
- Differing Interpretation
CONTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
5.1 LAND
Availability
- Cost
5.2 LEGAL
- Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA)
- Deeds Office
- Surveyor General’s Office
- Illegal Occupants
- Support by SAPS for evictions
5.3 LOCAL AUTHORITIES
- Service Level Agreements
- Councillors involvement in subsidy
applications
5.4 POLICY
- R2479 ‘own contribution’
- Interpretation (particularly
PHP)

11. QUO VADIS? QUO VADIS? TO BECOME THE ORGANISATION OF CHOICE
- 11 -
QUO VADIS?
TO BECOME THE ORGANISATION OF CHOICE
FOR MUTUALLY AGREEABLE “GOVERNMENT
LINKED” HOUSING AUTHORITIES/AGENCIES
BY PROVIDING THEM WITH IMPLEMENTATION
SOLUTIONS FOR PROJECTS IN PURSUANCE
OF THE ‘NATIONAL PRIORITIES’
QUO VADIS?
TO BECOME THE ORGANISATION OF CHOICE
FOR MUTUALLY AGREEABLE “GOVERNMENT
LINKED” HOUSING AUTHORITIES/AGENCIES
BY PROVIDING THEM WITH IMPLEMENTATION
SOLUTIONS FOR PROJECTS IN PURSUANCE
OF THE ‘NATIONAL PRIORITIES’

12. - 12 -
7. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
7. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS