Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHenrik Szabó Modified over 5 years ago
1
QGP Formation Signals and Quark Recombination Model
Chunbin Yang Central China Normal University Wuhan
2
Outline Heavy ion collisions and QGP formation Anomalies at RHIC
Physics ideas in the recombination model Fragmentation in the recombination model Applications to Au+Au collisions NCQ scaling of flow v2 Violation of the scaling Particle species dependence of Cronin effect Discussions C.B. Yang
3
Hot and Dense Cooling down Initial conditions freezing out
time Hot and Dense Cooling down freezing out Initial conditions and interactions C.B. Yang
4
QGP signal from the bulk?
QGP formation signals Strangeness enhancement Suppression of J/Ψ Dilepton enhancement Direct photon … Parton degree of QGP? QGP signal from the bulk? Experimental probes: 1) Penetrating probes: “jets” energy loss 2) Bulk probes :Elliptic flow, radial flow … C.B. Yang
5
Evidence for the formation of QGP
Single hadron Dihadron Jet quenching Energy loss of jets in medium No suppression for p spectrum C.B. Yang
6
Hadron production mechanisms
Partons are produced in high energy collisions like e++e-, e+p, p+p, p+A,A+A Partons in the final stage of evolution are converted into hadrons HOW? C.B. Yang
7
Traditional models String formation and break for low p T
Fragmentation for high p T The string model may not be applicable to heavy ion collisions Fragmentation failed for central Au+Au collisions C.B. Yang
8
Anomalies at intermediate pT
B/M v2(pT) Jet structure Cronin effect p/ ≈1 v2(baryons) > v2(mesons) not the same as in pp RCPp > RCP Hard to be understood in traditional models C.B. Yang
9
Hadronization by recombination
The colliding system generates quarks and gluons in the phase space The quarks get dressed The dressed quarks recombine into hadrons to the detector C.B. Yang
10
Why Recombination? meson momentum higher yield heavy penalty p1+p2 q
Parton distribution (log scale) (recombine) (fragment) higher yield heavy penalty C.B. Yang
11
Features soft parton density depends on medium
quark momenta add, higher yield for high produced pT hadrons soft parton density depends on medium more quarks for baryons than for mesons enhanced dependence on centrality for baryons when thermal partons are involved C.B. Yang
12
No anomalies in recombination
At intermediate pT, aplenty soft quarks are more important for proton production than for pionsp/1 For baryons, three quarks contribute to the flow, while only two quarks for mesons v2(baryons) > v2(mesons), quark number scaling Soft and semi-soft recombination Cronin effect Process dependence of soft partons different jet structure in dA and AA C.B. Yang
13
Recombination models Use just the lowest Fock state
i.e. valence quarks qqqB q qbarM Gluons converted to quarks first The probability for two (three) quarks to form a meson (baryon) is given by a process independent recombination function R C.B. Yang
14
Different implementations
Duke group etc: 6-dimensional phase space using Wigner function from density matrix Oregon group: one-dimensional momentum space using phenomenological recombination function C.B. Yang
15
Duke approach Low pT recombination high pT fragmentation C.B. Yang
16
Texas/Ohio approach Texas A&M/Budapest (Ko, Greco, Levai, Chen)
Monte Carlo implementation (with spatial overlap) Soft and hard partons Soft-hard coalescence allowed Ohio State (Lin, Molnar) ReCo as a solution to the opacity puzzle C.B. Yang
17
Basic formulas in Oregon approach
C.B. Yang
18
Recombination functions
Given by the valon distribution of the hadrons C.B. Yang
19
Determining R R p was determined from CTEQ
From the parton distributions in proton a=b=1.755, c=1.05 at Q2=1GeV2 R was determined from Drell-Yan processes a=b=0 See Phys. Rev. C 66, C.B. Yang
20
Fragmentation? Recombination?
Answer: NO FRAGMENTATION only RECOMBINATION Fragmentation is not a description of the hadronization process. It uses phenomenological functions D(z) that give the probability of momentum fraction z of a hadron in a parton jet C.B. Yang
21
Fragmentation D(z) q A C.B. Yang
22
Parton shower recombination fragmentation q h Parton shower
Initiating parton (hard) Parton shower (semi-hard) h recombination fragmentation C.B. Yang
23
Recombination for fragmentation
Fragmentation function known from fitting e+e- annihilation data S V G S K G K BKK KKP etc Recombination function known in the recombination model Hwa, Phys. Rev. D (1980). Shower parton distributions K, L, G, Ls, Gs C.B. Yang
24
Fitted results C.B. Yang
25
Shower parton distributions
C.B. Yang
26
Application to Au+Au collisions
Thermalized low pT (soft) partons Hard partons (semi-hard) shower partons Three types of recombination for mesons thermal parton & thermal parton thermal parton & shower parton shower parton & shower parton Joint parton distribution is not factorizable C.B. Yang
27
Hard parton distributions fi(k) can be calculated from
Parton sources Thermal parton distribution is assumed Hard parton distributions fi(k) can be calculated from pQCD nuclear shadowing nuclear geometry C.B. Yang
28
Parton sources Single shower parton distribution is
Joint two (three) shower parton distribution can also be written down C.B. Yang
29
Spectrum (0-10%) C.B. Yang
30
Nuclear modification RAA
C.B. Yang
31
p spectrum C.B. Yang
32
p/ C.B. Yang
33
Centrality dependence
C.B. Yang
34
New physics Thermal-thermal recombination makes p/ increase from very small value to about 1 at pT3GeV/c Thermal-shower recombination plays an important role This recombination can be equivalently regarded as modification of the fragmentation functions C.B. Yang
35
NCQ scaling AMPT model results: Scaling in v2: partonic dof dominant;
No scaling in v2 : hadronic dof dominant => A tool to search for the possible phase boundary! The beam energy dependence of the partonic cross sections will not affect the v2 scaling argument. Important for Beam Energy Scan program. C.B. Yang
36
NCQ scaling violation C.B. Yang
37
Validity of the assumptions?
Why NCQ scaling ? joint distribution φdependence collinear Assumptions: F(p1,p2)=F(p1)F(p2) Validity of the assumptions? C.B. Yang
38
Why NCQ scaling violates?
Because of quark interactions, joint distributions are not products of quark distributions Recombined quarks not necessarily have the same momentum Fluctuations: large n=1,3 terms appears in quarks distributions. They contribute to v2 NCQ at RHIC may be coincident C.B. Yang
39
Application to d+Au collisions
Basic formulas the same as for Au+Au collisions Soft parton distribution the same form, T not temperature but inverse slope No jet quenching Nuclear shadowing a little different from that in Au+Au case C.B. Yang
40
Pion spectrum C.B. Yang
41
Centrality dependence
C.B. Yang
42
Cronin effect Enhancement of hadron spectrum in pA
collisions at high pT Traditional explanation: initial interactions Many soft collisions before the last hard one, each gives a kT kick C.B. Yang
43
Cronin effect Shadowing effect is cancelled partially C.B. Yang
44
Puzzles If Cronin effect is really due to initial interactions, dilepton spectrum should show similar effect. Experimentally, the effect for dilepton is very small, no definite conclusion Species dependence of the Cronin effect C.B. Yang
45
From recombination Medium density depends on centrality
Medium effects are different in meson and baryon production C.B. Yang
46
Proton spectrum T different for different centralities C.B. Yang
47
RCP for proton C.B. Yang
48
RCP for p & C.B. Yang
49
Discussions QGP signal can be found from the bulk
Hadronization of partons can be described by ReCo for d+Au and Au+Au collisions ReCo naturally explains species dependence, such as baryon enhancement, v2 scaling... Cronin effect can be interpreted as from final state interactions C.B. Yang
50
Discussions Combination with other models, such as hydrodynamics etc, is needed and under development Recombination formulism from pQCD How to calculate the joint distributions? C.B. Yang
51
The End Thank you all! C.B. Yang
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.