Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Integrating Best Practices of Participant Evaluation Clinical Instructor Intensive Adrienne Small, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, CHSE Medical Instructor Duke University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Integrating Best Practices of Participant Evaluation Clinical Instructor Intensive Adrienne Small, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, CHSE Medical Instructor Duke University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Integrating Best Practices of Participant Evaluation Clinical Instructor Intensive Adrienne Small, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, CHSE Medical Instructor Duke University School of Nursing

2 Standards of Best Practice For Participant Evaluation
Reference: INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM

3 All simulation-based experiences require participant evaluation
Determine the type of evaluation prior to the simulation experience: - Formative evaluation - Summative evaluation - High-stakes evaluation 

4 Participant evaluation is:
Directed by desired objectives and outcomes  Guided by the type of evaluation:  formative, summative, or high-stakes

5 Formative Assessment •Learner-centered
•Ongoing, focused on learning and growth •Provides feedback to learners •Measures progress toward outcomes •Can be ungraded

6 Methods of Formative Assessment

7 Know the difference between a pattern and an isolated incident
Know what to look for Observations should be recorded so that you are able to give students clear examples Know the difference between a pattern and an isolated incident Instructor's biases and values Staff or preceptor feedback Simulations:  feedback from lab faculty or SPs

8 Observation

9 Questioning

10 SUMMATIVE EVALUATION -Graded -Focused on competencies and outcomes
- May occur at the end of a unit or module - End-of-course or end-of-program testing *Students should be told what to expect * For instructors:  end-of-course evaluations SUMMATIVE EVALUATION

11 Tools for Summative Evaluation:
•Anecdotal notes •Clinical evaluation tools •Written work •Written exams •Practical exams •OSCEs

12 Clinical Evaluation Tools
Objective assessment of clinical abilities and professionalism Can be formative (e.g. Midterm eval) or summative (e.g. Final eval) Specific to programs/program outcomes Evaluate competencies and behaviors Include student self-eval and faculty eval Increased complexity and autonomy are expected as students progress

13 Types of simulations that can be used for evaluation
Simple:  Task trainer with a skilled observer Mechanical:  hi-fidelity mannikin with a skilled observer Standardized patients Virtual reality: programs like I-Human and Shadow Health

14 Objective Structured Clinical Examination An instructor observes the students perform a certain task, or an examination. Standardized patients are often used for OSCEs. OSCE

15 High Stakes Testing – benefits for students
Conducted at the end of a learning process  Can also be used at other times to assess gaps in knowledge Identifies safety issues in learning. Provides proof of learners' clinical competencies Assesses readiness for real-world practice

16 High Stakes Testing – Caveats for instructors
MUST be pilot tested to work out bugs Consequences and outcomes must be explained to participants Participants should have been exposed to simulation in the past Needs a comprehensive rubric or checklist that clear outlines expectations Train the raters on the tool Establish interrater reliability Video recording is preferable Use more than 1 evaluator for each participant, either live or recorded


Download ppt "Integrating Best Practices of Participant Evaluation Clinical Instructor Intensive Adrienne Small, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, CHSE Medical Instructor Duke University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google