Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDonato Ippolito Modified over 5 years ago
1
Magnetic Field Diagnostics at the DESY Vertical Teststands
TTC Meeting at TRIUMF – M. Wenskat – on behalf of the SRF Team
2
AMTF Cryostats Diagnostics during European XFEL production
3 TVO sensors outside of cryostat Below cavity Between E3/E4 Above cavity No magnetic field diagnostics Only insert 1 equipped with T-sensors; mainly used during commissioning
3
Vertical Test Insert – R&D
Equipped with Diagnostics 16 OSTs 3 Cernox sensors 3 Fluxgate sensors 3 RRR Sensors (3 coils each) A lot of “potential problems” (cables, heaters, screws/nuts, bellows)
4
First DAQ Run Bsc/Bnc = 1.4 MF1 MF2 MF3
5
1DE3 Fast Cooldown MF1 MF2 MF3 300K to 4K in 1h Bsc/Bnc = 1.38 ΔT=3K
B [mG] 300K to 4K in 1h MF1 MF2 MF3 ΔT=3K B [mG] Bsc/Bnc = 1.38
6
Long-Term Sensor Run MSEH = 0.2 mG (regardless of T or channel)
B [mG] MSEH = 0.2 mG (regardless of T or channel) DAQ has issues with long runs Rather long time between data points (37s) MF1 & MF3 drift apart and merge later again
7
Influence of shielding
RT Start Closing Closed Start Opening Open B [mG]
8
Influence of shielding
2K Closed Start Closing B [mG]
9
MF1 – Tequator Δt=5s 3 1 2 5 4 5 3 2 1 5 4 Time Time B [mG] B [mG]
10
Summary New B-Sensors are functional – upgrade planned
First measurements on cavities are done Slow cooldown & warm up reasonable (Bsc/Bnc ~ 1.4) Fast cooldown shows unexpected behavior Influence of various factors need to be studied Shielding? Mechanical movements? Thermocurrents? Flux-Relaxation? Cool down procedure? He-properties (flow / pressure …)
11
Thanks for Listening Thanks to the complete DESY SRF team, I gave this talk on their behalf Only collaboration with many partners allows for complex R&D work
12
1DE3 Fast Cooldown
13
2) Large thermal gradients at Tc promote expulsion of flux
Measure temp at top of cavity Fast cool-down lead to large thermal gradients which promote efficient flux expulsion Slow cool-down → poor flux expulsion As middle hits Tc Helium cooling from below A. Romanenko et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, (2014) A. Romanenko et al., J. Appl. Phys. 115, (2014) Sam Posen 10/15/2019
14
Vertical Test Insert – R&D
Magnetic field measurements Förster-probe PFD-100 (differential measurement with compensation of the earth magnetic field) Background: 0.12 µT (or 1.2 mG) Insert 5 [µT] Heater element (cryo) 50 Regulation screw - pump valve 4,6 Bellow stiffening (antenna) 0,8 Nuts – plate cavity support 1,3 2nd Sound OST support 2,4 Plug – Pick up 2,6 RRR sensors outside 1,8 inside w/o. power 0,24 inside w. power 0,3 Insert 2 [µT] Heater element (cryo) 50 Regulation screw - pump valve 10 Bellow stiffening (antenna) x Nuts – plate cavity support 1,2 2nd Sound OST support 1,5 Plug – Pick up 3,3
15
1DE7 Normal cooldown
16
1DE3 - H – T Δt=38s Time Time MF1 MF1 MF3
17
1DE27 - MF2 – Tequator
18
1DE27 – MF3 – Tequator
19
1DE27 - MF1 - pHe Δt=11s
20
1DE27 - MF1 - pHe Δt=11s
21
AMTF Cryostats Magnetic field – central axis
|Earth magnetic field| ~ 49 µT
22
50K Dip ≡ Cryoperm Optimum?
[M. Hollister, SCUBA-2 instrument: an application of large-format superconducting bolometer arrays for submillimetre astronomy]
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.