Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Modeling the Ball-Bat Collision
Alan M. University of Illinois
2
Outline 1. Introduction 2. Physics-based collision model 3. Some interesting results 4. What’s Next?
3
1. Introduction: The Goals
Primary: Use parameters of ball-bat contact to predict batted ball outcome Contact: Bat speed, direction, orientation, location. Pitch speed, direction, spin rate & axis Outcome: Exit velocity, launch angle, direction, spin rate & axis Secondary: Reverse engineer to infer contact from outcome
4
2. Creating a Physics-Based Model of Ball-Bat Collision
Philosophy: How to do “real-world” physics Create a model for the collision Constrain the model using fundamental principles Determine unknown parameters from controlled experiments Confront model with real-world data Iterate as needed
5
2. Creating a Physics-Based Model of Ball-Bat Collision
Additional philosophy on doing “real-world” physics Simpify geometry to identify the essential physics w/o extraneous details Obtain model parameters Then relax simplifying assumptions to examine realistic situations
6
2. Creating a Physics-Based Model of Ball-Bat Collision
Simplfying assumptions Hit ball off tee Reduce to 2D geometry NOTE: “offset” and “CL” are equivalent attack angle AA offset E centerline angle CL vbat
7
Experiment: Swing Bat on Stationary Ball; Measure EV,LA,spin
Click here for article AA E CL
8
Forces on Ball f vball vbat Normal force (N) acts along centerline
“normal COR” eN Frictional force (f) acts tangential to surface “tangential COR” eT Launch angle lies between AA and CL Backspin due to f In absence of friction (f=0) LA=CL spin=0 EV=k*cos(CL-AA) but closer to CL
9
Some Results from Experiment
EV largest when AA lines up with CL “squared up” ~k*cos(CL-AA) Spin depends on how AA and DA line up with CL small when squared up ~c*sin(CL-AA) LA depends mostly on CL (or offset) and less on AA N f vbat vball
10
Analogy with golf In both cases, LA determined mainly by CL
11
Final Words On Experiments
Experiments have taught us some important features regarding dependence of batted ball on CL and AA They have also determined good values for the two unknown parameters: eN and eT We can now proceed with confidence to a more realistic situation Model should work well for most batted ball parameters Exception: spin rate, which is sensitive to things omitted from model
12
More Realistic Situation
AA descent angle DA E CL vpitch vbat Ball is moving Velocity Descent angle Spin Bat is oriented Tilt out of horizontal plane “tilt angle” Rotated horizontally “fan angle” Altogether 4 angles
13
Some Observations There are 4 different independent variables
CL, AA, fan, tilt There are 5 different dependent variables EV, LA, SA, spin rate, spin axis Many ways to display the data I will show only a few
14
Observation 1 (fan=tilt=0):
Max EV when AA=CL AA squared up topspin low spin Spend lots of time here. EV-CL: makes sense Backspin, topspin backspin
15
Observation 2 (fan=tilt=0):
Launch angle for max EV related to attack angle A potential tool to study batter tendencies AA=15 AA=5 AA=25
16
Example: Stanton vs. Gallo
Similar max EV ~ 116 mph LA for peak EV very different ~ 50 vs. 220 different attack angle & HR/BB wOBA=0.404 wOBA=0.522
17
3: Attack Angle and Timing
Example: Joey Gallo Attack Angle=190 Descent Angle=60 Bat Speed = 80 mph Suppose mis-timed by ±3 ms ±4” CL angle changes by ±200 (E by ±1”) That’s huge!
18
Observation 4 (fan0, tilt=0):
EV is stronger function of LA than SA Why the difference? AA CL vbat Note: Slope of EV vs AA is small; slope of spin vs AA is large.
19
line drives curve toward foul line
Observation 5 (fan0, tilt=0): Origin of sidespin Fan angle line drives curve toward foul line 450 -450 00 f Note: Slope of EV vs AA is small; slope of spin vs AA is large. But balls hit up the middle slice. Why?
20
Tilt angle: converts backspin to sidespin
Origin of sidespin Tilt angle: converts backspin to sidespin Balls hit to CF slice to opposite field Slice to opposite field > hook to pull field Confirmed by Statcast Tilt 00 300 Note: Slope of EV vs AA is small; slope of spin vs AA is large.
21
Summary Physics-based model for ball-bat collision developed w/empirical parameters from experiments Model qualitatively accounts for many observations from Statcast EV, LA, spin axis Spin rate more problematic Future developments Using motion analysis to develop model further Figure out why spin rate overpredicted Reverse engineer Develop tools to analyze batter tendencies Thanks to Lloyd Smith, Jeff Kensrud, Rawlings
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.