Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Methodological report. Assessment

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Methodological report. Assessment"— Presentation transcript:

1 Methodological report. Assessment
Kiev, Ukraine Sarmite Prole and Inga Oksentjuka Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia

2 Overview In the methodological report is included all necessary information for explanation and creating enterprise groups The structure of content is well prepared Suggested improvements

3 Suggestions on improvements of methodological report
Abbreviations Definitions Variables Additional remarks Algorithm Actualization Additional discussions

4 Abbreviations Suggestion to include the abbreviations

5 Definitions Clarification: Афілійовані підприє́мства Контроль
Additional: Enterprise group Multinational enterprise group Domestically controled enterprise group Resident enterprise group Natural person (resident/non resident) Control (direct/indirect) Voting rights Doughter company Assosiate company Affiliate сompany (связанное предприятие)

6 Statistical concept Statistical unit “enterprise group” group may exist if it engages at least two companies, and more than 51% of the capital is owned or controlled by other enterprise or it has more than 51% of voting rights or they are under its control. Types of enterprise groups: All resident enterprise group Multinational enterprise group: Domestically controlled truncated group Foreign controlled truncated group

7 Variables Based on Regulation 177/2008 Changes in explanation of variables

8 Additional remarks Legal form of enterprises in EG
Consistency of terminology Same definition in report for all variables Reference to national legislation/methodology

9 Algorithm The algorithm should be described Steps:
Choose frame for preparation Define statistical unit enterprise group (50%+1) Create initial EG Adding related units with major control (10-100%)

10 Actualization Update Checking of changes Consist or not to EG
Changes within EG or not Level of changes Shares Continuity rules Date and data sources

11 Additional discussion
Historical frame structure timeliness Validations dates only one EG not less than 2 legal units shares (10-100%) Demographic characteristics More strict explanation of paragraphs

12 Thank You!


Download ppt "Methodological report. Assessment"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google