Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous.

Published byBuck Harper Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous astrocyte specificity (top) and coverage (bottom). Astrocyte specificity is summarized in top diagram, red=over 90%; pink=80 to 90%, and navy=60 to 70%. Astrocyte coverage is summarized in bottom diagram, red=over 90%; pink=80 to 90%; purple=70 to 80%; navy=60 to 70%; and blue=50 to 60%. (B) Summary table of quantitative analysis results in each characterized region. Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous astrocyte specificity (top) and coverage (bottom). Astrocyte specificity is summarized in top diagram, red=over 90%; pink… Exp Neurobiol Dec;27(6):

Download ppt "Fig. 10. Summary of astrocyte specificity and coverage of hGFAP-CreERT2 in various brain regions. (A) Schematic sagittal section diagram shows heterogeneous."

Similar presentations

This will be your summary section.

This will be your summary section.
Fig. 4-1, p. 107. Fig. 4-2, p. 109 Fig. 4-3, p. 110.

Fig. 4-1, p Fig. 4-2, p. 109 Fig. 4-3, p. 110.
Slide 1Fig. 2.1a, p.25. Slide 2Fig. 2.1b, p.25 Slide 3Table 2.1, p.25.

Slide 1Fig. 2.1a, p.25. Slide 2Fig. 2.1b, p.25 Slide 3Table 2.1, p.25.
Slide 1Fig. 22.1, p.669. Slide 2Fig. 22.3, p.670.

Slide 1Fig. 22.1, p.669. Slide 2Fig. 22.3, p.670.
Slide 1Fig. 17.1, p.513. Slide 2Table 17.1, p.514.

Slide 1Fig. 17.1, p.513. Slide 2Table 17.1, p.514.
P.464. Table 13-1, p.465 Fig. 13-1, p.466 Fig. 13-2, p.467.

P.464. Table 13-1, p.465 Fig. 13-1, p.466 Fig. 13-2, p.467.
Fig. 11-1, p. 359. p. 360 Fig. 11-2, p. 361 Fig. 11-3, p. 361.

Fig. 11-1, p p. 360 Fig. 11-2, p. 361 Fig. 11-3, p. 361.
© red ©

© red ©
Table 6-1, p. 161. Fig. 6-1, p. 162 p. 163 Fig. 6-2, p. 164.

Table 6-1, p Fig. 6-1, p. 162 p. 163 Fig. 6-2, p. 164.
Figure 1.1 The observer in the truck sees the ball move in a vertical path when thrown upward. (b) The Earth observer views the path of the ball as a parabola.

Figure 1.1 The observer in the truck sees the ball move in a vertical path when thrown upward. (b) The Earth observer views the path of the ball as a parabola.
1 times table 2 times table 3 times table 4 times table 5 times table

1 times table 2 times table 3 times table 4 times table 5 times table
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
EXAMPLE 1 Graph a system of two inequalities Graph the system of inequalities. y > –2x – 5 Inequality 1 y < x + 3 Inequality 2.

EXAMPLE 1 Graph a system of two inequalities Graph the system of inequalities. y > –2x – 5 Inequality 1 y < x + 3 Inequality 2.
Tables Learning Support

Tables Learning Support
Fig. 6-CO, p. 184. p. 185a p. 185b p. 185c p. 185d.

Fig. 6-CO, p p. 185a p. 185b p. 185c p. 185d.
Fig. 4. TGF-α is one of the major cytokines in M2 conditioned media

Fig. 4. TGF-α is one of the major cytokines in M2 conditioned media
Fig. 1. In situ hybridization analysis for detecting endogenous mBest1 transcript in whole-brain region. In situ hybridization results from coronal (top.

Fig. 1. In situ hybridization analysis for detecting endogenous mBest1 transcript in whole-brain region. In situ hybridization results from coronal (top.
Area Between Two Curves

Area Between Two Curves
Fig. 1. Infarct size and behavioral outcomes in response to single and repeated treatment of hUCB-MSCs after MCAO. (A) Schematic of the time schedule.

Fig. 1. Infarct size and behavioral outcomes in response to single and repeated treatment of hUCB-MSCs after MCAO. (A) Schematic of the time schedule.
Fig. 2. Severities of seizures by durations and daily frequency at different time points. (A) An example of seizure activity in EEG recording. (B) Seizure.

Fig. 2. Severities of seizures by durations and daily frequency at different time points. (A) An example of seizure activity in EEG recording. (B) Seizure.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google