Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHerman Budiono Modified over 5 years ago
1
LCLS Conventional Facilities David Saenz Systems Manager
2
Conventional Facilities Overview
ISEMS Current Status of CF Status of AE Contract Administrator (Title III) Status of CMGC (Construction Prep) Plans for Construction
3
Integrated Safety Environmental Management System (ISEMS)
Define Scope of Work Physics Requirement Document # (rev.1) Room Data Sheets Title I/Title II Design drawings and specifications Analyze Hazards Excavations Subsurface construction Naturally occurring asbestos Elevated work Electrical Heavy equipment
4
Integrated Safety Environmental Management System (ISEMS)
Develop/Implement Hazard Controls Reviews by Citizen Committees, Subject Matter Experts (CEF, CF, ESH) Advisory groups (Tunneling/MEP) CF Project Managers and University Technical Representatives Certified Safety Professionals required on-site during construction Engineering Control Measures Slip resistant surfaces at appropriate locations Design of parapet Design tie-off points on roof with no parapet Perform the Work While Controlling the Risks! Evaluate the Performance Lessons Learned As-Builts
5
Current Status of CF Sector 20 Injector Facility completed on schedule
Magnet Measurement Facility completed on schedule Utility Line to MMF was delayed due to unseasonably wet weather Final Focus Test Beam Wall Plug completed on schedule Nearly 40K hours without injuries
6
Current Status of CF Final Focus Test Beam Managed by LCLS (R. Boyce)
Completed ahead of schedule Project is predecessor to TCCo commencing RSY activities
7
Current Status of CF RSY Demolition Activities – B113 Hibay, B102 A/B, SLC Gas Pad Managed by SLAC LCLS CF (R. Law) Contract awarded ~ May 15, 06 NTP scheduled for June 19, 06 Scheduled completion July 17, 06 Project is predecessor to TCCo commencing RSY activities B113 B102
8
CF Responsibility Assignment Matrix
9
Status of AE CA Title III
Final negotiations for on-site JE Construction Administrator (CA) support is well underway Candidate (Mr. James Cranston) has been interviewed and selected Several years of experience with DOE related projects, SNS most recently Anticipating on-site presence within 30 days CA will be co-located with the CF group in the field JE has engaged in Title III support activities Issue For Construction drawings complete RFI’s Owner-Architect-Turner (OAT) weekly meetings
10
Status of CM/GC Construction Preparation
Notice of Intent (NOI) issued to TCCo June 12, 06 Anticipating Authorization to Proceed July 1, 06 Mobilization and Site Work commences August 1, 06 Tunneling operations scheduled to commence in early Fall GC staff peaks at 19 personnel on-site TCCo conducted several potholing activities and completed underground surveys as scheduled Initial application of Storm Water Prevention Plan (SWPP) sent to BAAQMD for notification Work the approved processes in place for Change Orders, Request For Information (RFI) and Submittals Turner schedule meets or exceeds LCLS needs
11
Construction Logistics Plan
Location for spoils Project will have site fencing at perimeter CMGC/Subs/CF Staff trailers Location for spoils
12
Construction Site Access Plan
13
Bid Group #1 Bid Analysis
Bids higher than anticipated Engaging Tuner and SLAC upper management to assist in strategizing ways to reduce cost Engaging JE with TCCo joint session meetings to review estimated cost for unit prices and quantities Reviewing data from subcontractors for high cost items
14
LCLS CF Bid Group 1 Bid Analysis
Turner/LCLS estimates within ~7%, a 31% ∆ exists between bid results ($69.2 M versus $52.8 M) and LCLS estimate Overall > 50% response rate (53 bids) 4 of 9 bid packages contain > 95% of the delta ($16.4 M concrete, plumbing, HVAC, electrical)
15
LCLS CF Bid Group 1 Bid Analysis
Concrete bid price drivers – 2 bids rec’d ($17.2M apparent low - $26.3M next bid) 52% ∆ Labor inefficiency marks Concrete material unit price deltas 22% higher than estimated cost ~$1M Subcontractor general conditions ~ $1M or 6% compared to JE 3% Rebar estimating disconnects ~2M# delta between TCCo and sub ~$2.5M Opportunity costs
16
LCLS CF Bid Group 1 Bid Analysis
Plumbing bid – 2 bids rec’d ($3.9M apparent low - $4.8M next bid) 23% ∆ HVAC – 3 bids rec’d ($8.7M apparent low - $11.8M next bid) 36% ∆ Price drivers Labor costs ~3 X’s estimate Duct fabrication 2275 MH (TCCo) vs 5,600 MH sub 146% ∆ Installation 5,505 MH (TCCo) vs 14,720 MH sub 167% ∆ General conditions disconnects Electrical bid – 2 bids rec’d ($10.9M apparent low - $11.2M next bid) within 1.3% of each other Copper price increases ~30% higher than estimated cost Labor inefficiency marks Overall some savings attainable after continued review, however insurance, bonding and opportunity costs, coupled with impact of CW Driver/Saylor are causing bid results: budget disconnects Future pricing outlook indicates no relief!
17
Bay Area Impacts on LCLS Bid Group 1
Leland Saylor Associates 2006 Q1 Report Labor escalation, strong global material demands, weak U. S. dollar, insufficient Ca. contractor bonding capacity, code escalation, energy costs, copper prices all going up dramatically Lost 1 M construction craftsmen since 1992, takes 2-4 years to get to journeymen levels, higher labor inefficiency multipliers Demand in Ca for construction resources outpacing supply creating opportunity costs, charging what the market will bear CW Driver March 1, 2006 Report Skilled labor and material demands exceeding supply Katrina/Rita impact--$ 200 billion over next 4 years! Cost forecasts for 2006, concrete +88%, rebar +127%, copper +235%, insurance/bonding costs + 230%, HVAC equip. + 35% Expect only 1 or 2 bids over the next few years on projects LBNL Construction Cost Forum, June 13, 2006 supports assertions of Driver & Saylor reports
18
Bid Group 1 Results Path forward
Release initial set of bid packages valued at ~$25.5M by July 1, 06 Surveying, Earthwork, Site Utilities, Fire Protection, Tunneling Will release remaining bid packages (valued at ~ $43.5M) based on negotiation results anticipated over the next 30 days No schedule impact at this point in time
19
Bid Groups 2 - 4 Bid Group 2 – est. value ~$8M
Bid due date June 21, 06. Originally 2 weeks earlier, held open to improve bidder competition Includes finish bid packages for Bid Group #1, i.e. site concrete, waterproofing, metal buildings, painting, etc Bid Group 3 and 4 [CLOC] – est. value ~ $28M Bid due date Aug 8, 06. Currently exploring alternative bid strategies
20
SLAC Plans for Construction - Phase 2
Lab has successfully modified Alpine Gate on schedule, opens today! Alpine Gate will be Main gate for all subcontractors and deliveries Gate 17 will remain open 24/7 Potholing and underground surveying in its final stages completion scheduled for June 30, 06 Tunnel rescue equipment has been purchased and received for on-site FD support. Training scheduled to be completed by July 31, 06 Continue to engage with Turner in developing a strong bidder list for Bid Groups #3 and #4 Continue coordinating with lab liaison (Steve Williams) for LCLS and SLAC interface issues
21
6 Month Look Ahead Plan/Goals
TCCo to negotiate final contract values with subs thru VE exercises SLAC to Issue Phase II Notice to Proceed to Turner Construction nlt July 1, 06 SLAC/TCCo to complete all underground utility investigations June 30, 06 SLAC to complete demolition of RSY buildings (FFTB, Bldg 113 Hi-Bay and Bldg 102 A/B) July 21, 06 SLAC to shutdown Pep Ring Road Aug 1, 06 TCCo mobilize on site Aug–Sept 06 Complete site-work mass excavation Sept 31, 06 TCCo to complete RSY underground utilities Oct 06 TCCo to commence BTH activities Oct 06 Commence tunneling activities Oct 06
22
End of presentation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.