1. Frequency distributions of (a), (d), (g), (j) & (m) maximum thicknesses and (b), (e), (h), (k) & (n) apparent widths, and (c), (f), (i), (l) & (o) tables of percentile values of these dimensions for channelized sandbodies in the five studied exposure ‘windows’ (Fig. 4): (a), (b) & (c) ‘window’ A1; (d), (e) & (f) ‘window’ C1; (g), (h) & (i) ‘window’ C2; (j), (k) & (l) ‘window’ C3; and (m), (n) & (o) ‘window’ F4.
Frequency distributions of (a), (d), (g), (j) & (m) maximum thicknesses and (b), (e), (h), (k) & (n) apparent widths, and (c), (f), (i), (l) & (o) tables of percentile values of these dimensions for channelized sandbodies in the five studied exposure ‘windows’ (Fig. 4): (a), (b) & (c) ‘window’ A1; (d), (e) & (f) ‘window’ C1; (g), (h) & (i) ‘window’ C2; (j), (k) & (l) ‘window’ C3; and (m), (n) & (o) ‘window’ F4. Black histograms show measured data in 1 m thickness increments and 100 m apparent width increments. Red and blue curves show apparent widths of sandbodies calculated for inferred values of modal true width and a normal distribution of orientations (defined by mean orientation and angular standard deviation, using values that are multiples of 10°; after Lorenz et al. 1985, appendix A). Red and blue values in the tables show apparent widths of sandbodies calculated for triangular distributions around these modal values of true width.
Carlos A. Villamizar et al. Petroleum Geoscience 2015;21:
© 2015 The Author(s)‏