Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Trevor D. Thompson NAACCR Conference 2019 Mathematical Statistician

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Trevor D. Thompson NAACCR Conference 2019 Mathematical Statistician"— Presentation transcript:

1 Defining Cancer Recurrence in a Population-Based Cancer Surveillance Study
Trevor D. Thompson NAACCR Conference 2019 Mathematical Statistician Cancer Surveillance Branch June 13, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2 Background Cancer recurrence is an important outcome not routinely captured by population-based registries Difficult time to event outcome to define Who is eligible for a recurrence? When to start the time to event clock (i.e. when are patients at risk)? When to censor? Assume disease-free through active follow-up date (last review of medical records) unless otherwise documented? At last documented disease-free date – clinical follow-up schedules vary Should cause of death information figure in?

3 NPCR Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)
Five US states (CO, LA, ID, NH, RI) Outcomes of interest – disease-free (DF) status, recurrence, and progression Active follow-up of medical records for a minimum of 32 months post-diagnosis with the majority followed at least 60 months N=17,802 breast and colorectal cancer cases diagnosed in 2011

4 NPCR Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)
Recurrence Status Coding: 0 = Patient never found to be DF 1 = Found to be DF and remained DF till the end of study 2 = Documented Recurrence 3 = Uncertain if recurrence based on incomplete documentation 4 = Uncertain if recurrence based on conflicting documentation 9 = Unknown; patient was DF but unclear if remained DF or recurred First recurrence date Type of recurrence (in situ, local, regional, distant) Recurrence source

5 Study Population Include only: First primary diagnosed in study period
Surgery patients Achieved DF status (at risk for recurrence) Known stage Exclude patients with no follow-up time: Missing surgery or recurrence date Unknown recurrence status and last DF date = surgery date N=9826 female breast cancers and N=3770 colorectal cancers

6 Methods Outcomes: Time from surgery to recurrence
Time from surgery to death or recurrence Censoring Methods/Assumptions: Assume no recurrence through active follow-up (AFU) date Censor at last documented DF date Used SEER Cause-Specific Death Classification as part of outcome algorithm Uses ICD codes to define cancer deaths for first primaries 0=Alive or dead of other cause, 1=Dead attributable to cancer DX We used cancer-specific COD only for sequence numbers 02+

7 Methods Discrete variables presented as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables presented as 25th / 50th / 75th percentiles Freedom from recurrence and recurrence-free survival presented as Kaplan-Meier estimates/figures Estimates censored at 4-years where follow-up was relatively complete

8 Events Algorithm – AFU Assumption
R = Recurrence, DR = Death or Recurrence Patients with a documented recurrence classified as both events at date of recurrence Patients classified as DF until end of study according to abstractor Patients that were DF but unclear if remained DF until end of study Vital Status COD R Status R Censor/Event Date DR Status DR Censor/Event Date Alive NA No Event AFU Date Died Non-Cancer* First of Death/AFU Date Event Death Date Cancer* Last DF Date Vital Status COD R Status R Censor/Event Date DR Status DR Censor/Event Date Alive NA No Event Last DF Date Died Non-Cancer* Death Date Event Cancer* Imputed halfway between last DF & Death * According to SEER Cause-Specific Death algorithm

9 Events Algorithm – Documented DF
R = Recurrence, DR = Death or Recurrence Patients with a documented recurrence classified as both events at date of recurrence Patients classified as DF until end of study according to abstractor Patients that were DF but unclear if remained DF until end of study Vital Status COD R Status R Censor/Event Date DR Status DR Censor/Event Date Alive NA No Event Last DF Date Died Non-Cancer* Event Death Date Cancer* Vital Status COD R Status R Censor/Event Date DR Status DR Censor/Event Date Alive NA No Event Last DF Date Died Non-Cancer* Event Death Date Cancer* Imputed halfway between last DF & Death * According to SEER Cause-Specific Death algorithm

10 Study Population - Demographics
Breast Cancer N=9826 Colorectal Cancer N=3770 Total N=13596 Age (years) 51 / 61 / 70 56 / 67 / 76 52 / 62 / 72 Sex Male 1924 (51.0%) 1924 (14.2%) Female 9826 (100.0%) 1846 (49.0%) 11672 (86.8%) Race White 8598 (87.8%) 3237 (86.0%) 11835 (87.3%) Black 1008 (10.3%) 465 (12.4%) 1473 (10.9%) American Indian / Alaska Native 44 (0.4%) 13 (0.3%) 57 (0.4%) Asian / Pacific Islander 124 (1.3%) 41 (1.1%) 165 (1.2%) Other 15 (0.2%) 6 (0.2%) 21 (0.2%) Unknown 37 8 45 Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 9281 (94.5%) 3556 (94.3%) 12837 (94.4%) Hispanic 545 (5.5%) 214 (5.7%) 759 (5.6%)

11 Study Population – AJCC Stage
Breast Cancer N=9826 Colorectal Cancer N=3770 Total N=13596 AJCC Stage 2007 (20.4%) 347 (9.2%) 2354 (17.3%) I 4438 (45.2%) 1115 (29.6%) 5553 (40.8%) II 2533 (25.8%) 1162 (30.8%) 3695 (27.2%) III 794 (8.1%) 1027 (27.2%) 1821 (13.4%) IV 54 (0.5%) 119 (3.2%) 173 (1.3%)

12 4-year Freedom from Breast Cancer Recurrence by AJCC Stage

13 4-year Freedom from Colorectal Cancer Recurrence by AJCC Stage

14 Summary: 4-Year Recurrence-Free Survival
AJCC Stage Breast cancer n=9,826 Colorectal cancer n=3,770 AFU Documented DF 95.2% 94.6% 82.2% 80.2% I 91.8% 91.3% 81.8% II-III 83.2% 82.4% 69.2% 67.7% IV 63.4% 63.0% 37.8% 36.7%

15 Summary PCOR dataset provides a unique opportunity to analyze cancer recurrence in a population-based setting Active follow-up of medical records with directly coded disease-free, recurrence, and progression status Recurrence is a difficult outcome to define Important to weigh the pros/cons of definitions/algorithms and acknowledge limitations Recurrence-free survival presents additional challenge of shorter follow-up for recurrence compared to death (via linkages)

16 Summary Recommend using active follow-up date in definitions rather than last DF date Logically makes sense given the nature of the PCOR data collection (abstractors reviewing records and directly coding recurrence status) Results in less censoring - increases % with complete follow-up Yielded similar results for recurrence and recurrence-free survival compared to documented DF dates Recommend using cause of death information as part of algorithms

17 Acknowledgements PCOR states – Investigators & Staff CDC
Colorado Central Cancer Registry Randi K. Rycroft Cancer Data Registry of Idaho Christopher J. Johnson Louisiana Tumor Registry Xiao-Cheng Wu, Mei-chin, Vivien Chen Rhode Island Cancer Registry David Rousseau New Hampshire State Cancer Registry Judith Rees, Bruce Riddle, Maria O. Celaya CDC *Trevor Thompson (Analytic Lead) *Loria Pollack (Project and Manuscript Lead) Manxia Wu MaryBeth Freeman Reda Wilson Jen Wike Vicki Benard ICF International Kevin B. Zhang Funding: This work was supported by the Patient Centered Outcome Research Trust Fund through CDC Cooperative Agreements of the National Program of Cancer Registries: in conjunction with the participating states and a CDC Patient Centered Outcome Research contract to ICF

18


Download ppt "Trevor D. Thompson NAACCR Conference 2019 Mathematical Statistician"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google