1. Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 1289-1297 (November 2009)
Pitt, a Novel Tetratricopeptide Repeat Protein Involved in Light-Dependent Chlorophyll Biosynthesis and Thylakoid Membrane Biogenesis in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 
Schottkowski Marco , Ratke Janina , Oster Ulrike , Nowaczyk Marc , Nickelsen Jörg  
Molecular Plant 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (November 2009)
DOI: /mp/ssp075
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1 Structure and Inactivation of the Pitt Gene.
(A) The amino acid sequence of the Synechocystis sp. Pitt (GI: ) was aligned with those of related proteins from Thermosynechococcus elongatus (GI: ), Gloeobacter violaceus (GI: ), Physcomitrella patens (GI: ), Oryza sativa (GI: ), and Arabidopsis thaliana (AT4G39470 and AT1G78915). Black and gray boxes indicate conserved and related amino acids, respectively. Transmembrane domains are underlined and the five TPR domains in Pitt are each marked by converging arrows.
(B) Strategy for constructing donor plasmids with inactivated Pitt. Directions of transcriptions are indicated by open arrows. The solid arrows represent the primers used for PCR-based segregation analysis of WT and pitt DNA (C).
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2 Pitt is a Membrane Protein.
(A) Western analysis of wild-type (WT), mutant (pitt) and complemented mutant (repitt) cells using an αPitt antiserum. As a loading control, the blot was probed with an αRbcL antibody.
(B) Total (T), membrane (M), and soluble (S) protein fractions (30 μg protein) of wild-type (WT) cells were immunodecorated with the indicated antibodies.
(C) Samples of the membrane fraction from the wild-type (WT) were treated with the indicated compounds, and separated into membrane (M) and soluble (S) fractions by centrifugation.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3 Accumulation of Photosynthetic Complexes in pitt.
(A) Low-temperature fluorescence emission spectra of whole cells of indicated strains are shown after excitation of chlorophyll at 435 nm. Spectra were normalized to the emission maxima at 685 nm.
(B) Total proteins of wild-type (WT) and pitt were probed with indicated antibodies.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4 Interaction of Pitt and POR.
Yeast two-hybrid analysis of Pitt fused to the DNA-binding domain of LexA (Pitt–DBD) and either POR or Pitt fused to the activation domain of LexA (POR–AD and Pitt–AD, respectively). Autoactivation of Pitt–DBD by AD alone can be excluded (see first panel).
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5 2-D BN/SDS–PAGE of Synechocystis Membranes.
Membrane fractions from wild-type (WT) and pitt mutant strains were solubilized with β-dodecylmaltoside, fractionated by 2-D BN/SDS–PAGE and blotted. Pitt and POR were detected with the appropriate antibodies. A representative 2-D gel loaded with wild-type (WT) proteins and stained with Coomassie is shown at the top. Asterisks indicate unspecific cross-reactions of the αPOR antibody.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6 Levels of POR Are Reduced in the pitt Mutant.
Western analysis of different amounts of protein extracts (100% correspond to 120 μg protein) from wild-type (WT) and pitt cells using the αPOR antiserum. As a loading control the blot was immunodecorated with αRbcL antiserum.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7 Chlorophyll Synthesis in pitt Cells.
Cells were grown under LAHG conditions and, at timepoint 0, cells were shifted to continuous illumination. Chlorophyll amounts of three independent experiments were measured at the given timepoints and the ratio of chlorophyll a (in mg) per cell density was plotted in relation to time. WT, solid line; repitt, dashed line; pitt, dotted line.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

9. Figure 8 Membrane Sublocalization of Pitt.
Fractionation of cell material from fraction V (Schottkowski et al., 2009) on a linear 30–60% sucrose gradient. After fractionation, proteins were subjected to Western analysis with the indicated antibodies. POR signals in the pitt mutant were overexposed to enable visualization of qualitative POR distribution throughout the gradient.
Molecular Plant 2009 2, DOI: ( /mp/ssp075)
Copyright © 2009 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions