1. Faculty Prioritization Process - Fall 2019 For 2020-21
Training Presentation
September 3, 2019
Blake Stephens, Co-Chair of Faculty Prioritization Committee
Tram Vo-Kumamoto, VPI and Co-chair of Faculty Prioritization Committee

2. Provide the President with a prioritized list for FT faculty requests to inform decision-making regarding the announcements of new faculty positions.
COMMITTEE CHARGE

3. Represent the interest of the college community
Represent the interest of the college community. Committee members will make decisions on campus- wide needs and opportunities.
Promote fairness and equity in resource allocations
Align your decision making with Mission and goals for the college
GUIDING PRINCIPLES

4. Group Norms Come prepared and on time
Stay mentally and physically present
Ask genuine questions
Explain reasoning and intent
Test assumptions and inferences
Listen with an open mind
Stay on point
Group Norms

5. Timeline Day of the Week Date/Dates Time Location Action Tuesday
Tuesday
September 3, 2019
3:00 PM - 5:00 PM
AGB 106
Committee to meet to review process and to receive access to packets
Tues - Fri
September 3 - 6, 2019
Online 
Review and provide questions regarding proposals
Monday
September 9, 2019
9:00 AM
Deadline for questions pertaining to submissions to OOI
Friday
September 13, 2019
Deadline for Divisions (Chairs and Deans) to provide responses to the questions to OOI
September 17, 2019
Committee to meet for proposal review and ranking
Week of September 16
October 1, 2019
3:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Academic Senate President and College President to review requests
Process Review
September 24, 2019
Requests presented as an informational item at Consultation Council
Wednesday
October 9, 2019
8:00 AM
Prioritized requests due to Chancellor's Office to be placed on Board of Trustees Docket for approval
October 28, 2019
5:00 PM
HS 145
Board of Trustees Meeting for request approval
Timeline

6. Community Needs

7. Key Findings from Draft Environmental Scan
EMPLOYMENT
Middle-Skill Jobs: two year degree, certificate, occupational licensing, or apprenticeship
Projected employment growth in area, approx. 100,000 new jobs by 2035
Healthcare employs the most workers in Orange County
Other key sectors, hospitality, manufacturing, retail trade & administrative and support services sectors.
CHANGING NATURE OF WORK
Skills gap among new hires, largely due to rapid changes in technology and the growing potential for automation.
New workforce needs to understand how to use technology and data, is flexible and adaptable as industries evolve, and has problem-solving skills to help employers stay competitive.
EMERGING INDUSTRIES
Logistics sector (Transportation & Warehousing)
Hospitality (Accommodations & Food Service)
IT, Digital Media and Big Data Analytics, Bioscience research, Biopharmaceuticals, and medical device manufacturing, and business and professional services.
Key Findings from Draft Environmental Scan 

8. College Needs

9. The Vision for Success at Saddleback
Access to required courses
Access to programs
Completion of English and Quantitative Reasoning (Mathematics and Psychology)
Completion of gatekeeper program courses 
Completion of degrees and certificates
The Vision for Success at Saddleback

10. Full-Time Faculty Count at Present

11. Heather

12. FTES/# of FT Faculty
Data point reflects the ratio of Full-time Equivalent Students to 1 FT faculty.

13. Heather

14. PT Faculty/FT Faculty
Data point reflects the ratio of PT faculty to 1 FT faculty

15. Heather

16. Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH)/FTEF
Data point reflects the ratio of weekly student contact hours to 1 Full-time Equivalent Faculty (includes PT and FT faculty). Also known as “productivity”.

17. Heather

18. Proposed Positions Division Department CS Counseling EL
Adult Education with Disabilities
EWDBS
Business #1
Business #2
FAMT
CTVR#1 
CTVR #2
HSHS
Nursing
KNES
Adapted Kinesiology LA
English#1 
English #2
ESL
MSE
Computer Science
Geology
Physics and Astronomy
SBS
Political Science
Proposed Positions

19. Ranking

20. CRITERIA & POINTS: 7.25 total points
Narrative (70%) – highest score is 5
FTES/# of FT faculty in area (30%) – highest score is 2.25
CRITERIA & POINTS: total points
Each rep will score each request, outside of their division, 1 (low to need/goal) to 5 (high to need/goal)
Final score will be total of all scores for the request divided by the number of eligible committee votes
Counseling, Librarians & Nursing will have a multiplier bc scored on narrative only
ordered from high to low & broken up into 5ths
2.25pts., 1.80 pts., pts., 0.90 pts., pts.
(1 FTES= 1 student enrolled in 15 hours for 2 terms)

21. Scoring Guide for Narratives
1 point
3 points
5 points
Data/Evidence in support of Need
Minimal needs as substantiated by appropriate data
Moderate need as substantiated by appropriate data
Significant need as substantiated by appropriate data
Critical for Program Goals and Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the program's ability to support student success
Lack of position would moderately impact the program's ability to support student success
Lack of position would significantly impact the program's ability to support student success
Critical to College Goals and Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Critical to Community/
Culture/Industry Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Scoring Guide for Narratives

22. Proposal Review

23. Submit questions by 9AM, Monday, September 9 via form.
Trish

24. Answers to questions Due by 9AM, Friday, September 13.
Compiled and sent out to committee to review during weekend prior to Tuesday, September 17 meeting.
Answers to questions

25. Next meetings Tuesday, September 17, 3-5 PM, AGB 106 – Ranking
Tuesday, October 1, 3-5 PM, AGB 106 – Process Review

26. Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring
No more than 3 minutes per position 
Scoring guide for the narrative portion will be provided for each position request
Scores for the FTES/# of FT Faculty will be presented
Scoring will be done electronically and is not anonymous
Voting for position within one’s division is not permitted
Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring
Heather

27. Please bring your own device to submit your scores.
BYOD