1. Hand Function and Motor Cortical Output Poststroke: Are They Related?
Brenda J. Brouwer, PhD, Kim Schryburt-Brown, MSc 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Representative electromyograms from (A) a control subject, (B) a subject with chronic stroke, and (C) a subject with subacute stroke showing side-to-side differences in silent-period duration (vertical dashed lines) and active MEP amplitudes. Note different scaling. Abbreviations: L, left; NP, nonparetic; P, paretic; R, right.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Scatterplots showing the relations between tapping ability and neurophysiologic measures of (A) motor threshold, (B) MEP amplitude, (C) MEP latency, and (D) silent period duration. The linear regression line and 95% confidence bands based on all data are shown.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Mean values +1 SD obtained for (A) hand-function tests and (B) neurophysiologic measures in subacute stroke assessed on admission to and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Abbreviation: SP, silent period.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions