1. Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix

2. Honoraria Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
Development of the Honoraria Matrix
How to use the Honoraria Matrix

3. Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada
Canadian Construction Association
Canadian Design-Build Institute
Construction Specifications Canada
Royal Architectural Institute of Canada
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Department of National Defence
Public Works and Government Services Canada
Defence Construction Canada

4. Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
Remuneration
50% of a reasonable fee
Based on complexity of the project and on level of detail contained in the Request for Proposal

5. Guide for Calculation of Remuneration
Remuneration = estimate of construction cost x scope factor x cost factor

6. Scope Factor Combination of: Level of detail in the RFP documents High
Medium
Low
Complexity of the project

7. Scope Factor:

8. Cost Factor:

9. Example
Aquatic Centre with competition pool, wave pool, leisure water play area, weight training, and exercise room - $32,000,000
RFP included building program, functional relationships and description of intended image and character
Best Value Selection 50% quality/50% price requiring a comprehensive proposal

10. Example - Scope Factor:

11. Example - Cost Factor:

12. Example - Remuneration
$32,000,000 x x = $167,000

13. Guide for the Calculation of Remuneration for Design-Build Proposals@

14. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design
For what project complexity is the delivery method best suited
To what extent must user requirements be defined prior to tender
What level of design quality is characteristically achieved with the delivery method

15. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design
How complex is the design review process for the owner
To what extent can the delivery method accommodate scope/design changes during construction phase

16. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Design
To what extent does the delivery method inherently minimize changes
To what degree do the owner and user have direct contact with the designer and are they able to directly influence the design

17. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Schedule
To what extent can the delivery method achieve accelerated delivery, or ensure delivery to specific schedule
Ability to accommodate early construction start

18. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Cost
Potential to obtain an early cost commitment
To what extent does the method accommodate adjustments to scope change during construction to achieve final costs within budget
To what ability can the delivery method reduce claims/costs for changes and delays

19. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Cost
Ability to meet cash flow
To what extent does the method permit the Owner to influence systems, materials and construction methods to minimize life cycle costs

20. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Contracting
To what extent is the required design and construction experience and knowledge available for the method
Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on publicly funded projects
Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on privately funded projects

21. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Contracting
Ability to pre-qualify subcontractors
To what extent does the method employ a simple bid evaluation and selection system
What level of construction quality can be achieved with the applicable delivery method

22. Methodology Assessment Matrix
Risk
To what extent does the method permit the Owner to transfer the liability for design errors and omissions, delays, construction errors and omissions and non conformance to contract documents

23. Methodology Assessment Matrix
General
To what extent do Owners have the experience and knowledge required to employ the method
Market readiness