Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006"— Presentation transcript:

1 weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006
MSC recent activities weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006

2 MSC “activities” during last week : F7 damping Vertical control
11/11/2019 MSC “activities” during last week : F7 damping Vertical control MSC “activities” during this week : ALL long towers ALL long towers 4 towers (under study) GIPC Short towers Vertical control EM-MSC wwwwwww

3 F7 F7 damping ty implemented in 6 towers LC and AA filters can with
11/11/2019 F7 damping ty implemented in 6 towers LC and AA filters can with no 16 mHz. handle to improve damping performance VS payload motion. other degrees of freedom ? EM-MSC wwwwwww

4 Vdamp vertical damping (y) implemented in 6 towers
basically the same filter used for horizontal ID 70 mHz). only top sensor used (F0) mseism rms reduction (NS-NS Horizon > 0 last stormy weather..). gain optimization under study short towers ? (this week) EM-MSC

5 Vdamp vertical damping (y) implemented in 6 towers
basically the same filter used for horizontal ID 70 mHz). only top sensor used (F0) mseism rms budget reduction in critical weather conditions (lock during last night storm) short towers ? (next step, probably, urgent) EM-MSC

6 GIPC Tested using all GC signals (PR,BS,NE,WE) at steps 1, 4, 12
yesterday night data under study > Mandatory issue: reduction of seismic (sea) re-injection > A shift is following EM-MSC

7 step 11 V-damp ON/OFF: 6 suspensions EM-MSC

8 step 11 V-damp ON/OFF one-by-one and OFF/ON All No crucial Improvement
O-B-O OFF ALL OFF ALL ON No crucial Improvement during OBO Test. Clear Improvement All OFF/ON Relationship with Angular fluctuations EM-MSC

9 step 11 V-damp ON/OFF one-by-one and OFF/ON All EM-MSC

10 storm+GIPC step 12 Next improvements and studies A major effort
necessary at LF during stormy weather! Note: preliminary version of GIPC And gain mistake Of IP reallocation @ WE. EM-MSC

11 mseism VS tilt EM-MSC

12 cavities locked independently
mseism ( ) mHz: relevant LVDTs seismic component in ID, blending must be accurate; => better lowering Acc/Pos cross-over frequency. cavities locked independently (correction signals) As expected Next slide Note: mseism produces excitation of payload pitch and yaw (qx,qz ). Notches implemented to reduce it. 30 mHz crossover N-arm 70 mHz crossover W-arm EM-MSC

13 wind speed || LVDT_rms increase (observation);
Tilt (f< 100 mHz): wind speed || LVDT_rms increase (observation); tilt causes fake acceleration (Losurdo, Passuello, Ruggi); => ID causes LVDT_rms increase through in-loop accel. signal. wind speed susp displacement X crossover f = 30 mHz; Z crossover f = 50 mHz EM-MSC

14 mandatory: reduction of rms displacement of IP at low frequency.
GIPC mandatory: reduction of rms displacement of IP at low frequency. main benefits: wind disturbance rejection, lock acquisition, duty-cycle. Once the ITF is locked, the mirror position, provided by the Global control, can be used instead of Local LVDT. GC (reconstructed z) Tested at step 4 WI,NI fx=30 mHz WE,NE,BS,PR fx= 70 mHz WI,NI Tower frames (LVDT vs ground) EM-MSC

15 BS,PR,NI under GIPC, fx =70 mHz all
EM-MSC


Download ppt "weekly meeting Cascina 28 Nov 2006"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google