Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array"— Presentation transcript:

1 Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array
Glen Langston Motivation: Molecular discoveries Focal Plane Arrays important for all observing bands First 7 pixel Array for 18 to 26 GHz NRAO Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

2 Molecular Discoveries: 100m
World’s most sensitive Telescope in frequency range 10 to 50 GHz Discovered >7 new large interstellar molecules, including propenal and propanal Widely distributed, not exclusively in compact cores Hollis, Snyder, Remijan and Jewell Langston, Turner 2007 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

3 Molecular Line Surveys
Science goals require wide instantaneous bandwidths Prime targets have many widely spaced narrow lines. Widely separated (Delta nu > 1 GHz) Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

4 1st Pixel Tests Completed
September 11, 2008 – Single Pixel Tests on GBT October 6, 2008 – IDM1 IF Spur studies – Measure versus feed position October 12, 2008 – Comparison of Current GBT K-band (K0) and Single Pixel (K1) December 28, 2008 – IDM 2 – Check of System temperature and compare K0 with K1 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

5 First Astronomical Tests
Peak and Focus results good. Obs revealed IF spurs, that are now understood. Extensive tests of interfaces. Web based monitor CLEO /Astrid scripts worked for test obs. Obs on Sept 11, 2008 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

6 1st Pixel Tests: Frequency Range
Orion A GHz H and He Recombination Lines Water Line and molecules Negative features are IF spurs Initial tests showed IF spur problems (now fixed) Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

7 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009
Gain and Tsys Tests Performed intensity measurements as a function of pixel offset from center location. Gain versus Position Offset 3.8’ in Azimuth and Elevation directions (LCP and RCP) Frequency Offset-Azimuth Offset-Elevation (GHz) Average Average /- 2.5 % /- 2.5 % /- 4.4 % /- 4.5 % Performed a sequence of obs with K0 Feed system followed by K1 sequence. Found higher system temperatures Cause: Low gain and IF spurs Obs Oct 6, 2008 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

8 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009
Spectral Line Tests Configured for TMC NH3 1-1 and 2-2 Lines, plus HC7N Baseline Performance Good, similar to K0 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

9 Baseline Stability Check
Comparison of twenty five 90 second observations Obs. Sig-Ref/Ref calibrated with same average reference scan No significant baseline structure changes. No baseline fit subtracted, only single average value plus an offset to separate spectra Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

10 1st Pixel Tests: Line Mapping
Taurus Molecular Cloud HC7N NH3 Simultaneous Maps of several lines Note High GBT Sensitivity: Only 2 seconds per pixel! Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

11 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009
RMS noise Versus Time RMS decreases roughly as expected with time. Plot shows measured RMS in spectra and sqrt(T) model. Common Reference may add to systematic noise. Glitch may be due to weather or Processing (?) Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

12 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009
K0/K1 Tsys Comparison K0/K1 Comparisons at 19, 21, 23 and 25 GHz show comparable performance Weather Variations limit comparison accuracy All obs show increasing Tsys with time. 23 GHz results typical Obs on Dec. 28, 08 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

13 Efficiency Estimate at 23 GHz
Efficiency estimated by comparison of 3C123 peak intensities (K) for K0 and K1. Two K0 measurements and one K1 Measurements at 23 GHz. Weather dominates uncertainty (and cal values) K1/K0 Efficiency LCP RCP ==== === 99% % 95% % 96% % 88% % Ratio of 3C123 Peak Heights Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

14 Mapping Tests: Multiple Beams
HC7N HC5N Software for Mapping Tests using Current GBT Rx: Two Beam mapping works, must write software for 7 beams. Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

15 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009
IDM 2 Tests 2nd IDM showed no IF spurs Tsys performance similar to K0 Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009

16 Summary: Planned Tests Accomplished
First On Telescope tests showed good basic performance, and identified engineering tasks Tests of gain offsets versus feed position were consistent with predictions. Second IDM seems free of IF Spurs Baseline stability seems good Comparison of K0/K1 is good (Weather limits accuracy) RMS decreasing with integration time. Further observations needed for firm conclusions Wide frequency (18 to 26 GHz) observations are critical for study of important large molecules and Chemistry. Glen Langston: KFPA CDR: Jan 2009


Download ppt "Molecular Imager: Focal Plane Array"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google