1. Brigadier General Md Amin Akbar Colonel Justus Majyambere
IMPORTANCE OF INTEGRATED PLANNING IN THE CONTEMPORARY SECURITY LANDSCAPE
Brigadier General Md Amin Akbar
Bangladesh
Colonel Justus Majyambere
Rwanda
Group B

2. TALKING POINTS Contemporary security landscape
Defining the concept of Integrated planning (IP).
Application of IP in contemporary and wider security context.

3. CONTEMPORARY SECURITY LANDSCAPE
Traditional conventional security threats have reinforced by non traditional threats to shape the contemporary security landscape
According to Dr. Shannon A. Brown ‘facets of the Global Security Landscape’ focused on four key threads:
Ongoing conventional wars
Humanitarian and disaster relief operations or environmental crisis
The fusion of terrorism with civil war, underpinned by revanchist or aspirational ideologies that seek to destroy borders and states
“Frontier threats” that include a portfolio of emerging technologies

4. NONTRADITIONAL SECURITY THREATS
Human Security
Disease
Hunger
Unemployment
Social conflicts
Crime
Political repression
Food security
Personal conflicts
Sub-group conflicts interpersonal conflicts
Social Security
Identity of the group
Change of demography
Radicalisation
Religious extremism
Urbanisation
Economical disparities
Education
Social Media
Migration
Refugees crisis
Problems IDPs
Environmental degradation
Environmental Health
Environmental issues with energy
Environmental issues with resources
Overpopulation
Genetically modified food
Pollution
Resource depletion
Climate Change
Water and Resource Conflicts
Water will become objectives of war and instruments of war in 21st century
Energy Crisis
Peak oil has become benchmark
Global climate change
Political instability of Middle East
Narcotics trafficking
Human trafficking 
Arms trafficking
Transnational Organised Crimes
Cyber Crimes
Cyber attacks
Cyber/Space Security

5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THREATS
Two distinct features characterize threats to security:
They transcend the boundaries of the nation-state
They are interconnected through processes of globalization
Non-military security challenges
J. Peter Burgess
International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO)
2007

6. DEFINING INTEGRATED PLANNING (IP)
Refers to joint planning activities involving all stakeholders.
Tactical
Operational
Strategic/National
Regional
Global
Regional Coop /
Integration
Global Approach
Whole-of-govt
approach
Joint Warfare
Combine arms
operations

7. DEFINING INTEGRATED PLANNING (IP)
Wider context of security is not only about military.
National Security
Defense
Prosperity
Influence ??
DIME++
Diplomatic.
Information, Military.
Economic.
Legal.
Whole of society.
???? IP

8. INTEGRATED PLANNING
Due to the complexity, nature and the threat level, countering efforts needed to be coordinated:
International level
Regional level
National level
Government actors
Private sector
INGOs
NGOs
Civil society

9. WHY INTEGRATED PLANNING IS IMPORTANT ?
It ensures government address all threats in a timely and coordinated manner
It will increase the effectiveness of security sector with the support of other partners
It will prevent duplications in execution
It will build domestic harmony and reconciliation
It will enhance regional and international confidence and cooperation
A centralized process of policy formulation that includes inputs from a variety of sources can help build a common understanding of security

10. WHY INTEGRATED PLANNING IS IMPORTANT ?
It allows economical, efficient and concentrated utilization of resources.
Integrated planning are confidence-building instruments at the regional and international levels
Intelligence sharing
Create close cooperation among stake holders
It can complement each other’s capabilities
Can guard the weaknesses and reduce vulnerabilities
Have common vision for an unified plan
Responsibility and accountability for the final plan
Provide legitimacy
It allows centralised coordination and execution

11. CHALLENGES TO INTEGRATED PLANNING (INTERNATIONAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL )
Divergent national geo political interests and objectives
Sovereignty of Nations
Foreign policy of States
Hidden agendas of stake holders
Sharing information
Cultural differences
Unstable political situations
Civil- Military protocols
Sharing resources
The role of alliances and their policies, and security and defence strategies
Technological trends

12. THE WAY FORWARD International
Element of National Power
Whole of government approach to address element of national power
International
Diplomatic
Informational
INTEGRATED PLANNING
Military
Integrate all Elements with all stakeholders
Democracy Tolerance Diversity
Economic
Security
Financial
Intelligence
Legal
Private
NGO
INGO
IGO
To be included
Political
Social

13. THANK YOU