Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised.

Published byClementine Wilson Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on Healthy Eating Index (HEI) total and component scores during pregnancy (n = 1,279), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). The coefficient for total fruit intake remained statistically significant at P < 0.05 when using Dubey/Armitage-Parmar adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing. CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 2. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on nutrient density during pregnancy (n = 1,279), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 3. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on Healthy Eating Index (HEI) total score and components at 1 month postpartum (n = 1,177), in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 4. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 4. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on nutrient density at 1 month postpartum, in a sample drawn from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study, a cohort of women recruited during pregnancy, Tennessee, 2006–2011. Difference-in-differences analysis was conducted by carrying out multivariable linear regressions adjusting for covariates listed in Table 1. The values above represent the coefficient on the term for interaction between WIC receipt during pregnancy and whether the pregnancy occurred after the revisions to the food package were implemented in October 2009; these coefficients capture the effect of the revised WIC food package on each of the outcomes of interest. Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (see Web Appendix 1). CI, confidence interval. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 16 May 2019, Pages 1493–1502, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 1. Effect of the revised food package from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ... Figure 1. Effect of the revised."

Similar presentations

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Flowchart of our CIS cohort considering patients (A) and eyes (B) as statistical unit. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1 Flowchart of our CIS cohort considering patients (A) and eyes (B) as statistical unit. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted predictors of PAC

Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted predictors of PAC
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 3 Multivariate regression analysis to display the impact of recanalization on the formation of ischaemic brain ... Figure 3 Multivariate regression.

Figure 3 Multivariate regression analysis to display the impact of recanalization on the formation of ischaemic brain ... Figure 3 Multivariate regression.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability

Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability
Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.

Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.

Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...
bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google