Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
HDR Supervisor Induction
HDR Supervisor Induction Research Integrity, Ethics and Hazardous Materials Gail Dixon Manager Research Integrity 18/JUL/2019 Welcome and thank you for taking on this very important role
2
RESPONSIBILITIES OF RESEARCHERS
Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 R14 Support a culture of responsible research conduct at their institution and in their field of practice. R21 Adopt methods appropriate to the aims of the research and ensure that conclusions are justified by the results. Retain clear, accurate, secure and complete records of all research including research data and primary materials. Where possible and appropriate, allow access and reference to these by interested parties.. Provide guidance and mentorship on responsible research conduct to other researchers or research trainees under their supervision and, where appropriate, monitor their conduct. R22 R15 Disseminate research findings responsibly, accurately and broadly. Where necessary, take action to correct the record in a timely manner. R16 Undertake and promote education and training in responsible research conduct. R23 Comply with the relevant laws, regulations, disciplinary standards, ethics guidelines and institutional policies related to responsible research conduct. Ensure that appropriate approvals are obtained prior to the commencement of research, and that conditions of any approvals are adhered to during the course of research. R24 Disclose and manage actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest. R17 Ensure that authors of research outputs are all those, and only those, who have made a significant intellectual or scholarly contribution to the research and its output, and that they agree to be listed as an author. R25 Ensure that the ethics principles of research merit and integrity, justice, beneficence and respect are applied to human research. R18 R26 Acknowledge those who have contributed to the research. From the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 Your responsibility as a supervisor is to ensure that you are educating and mentoring your students in adhering to the responsibilities for researchers Our students need to be well grounded in the responsible conduct of research to ensure their success over time Engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and respect their legal rights and local laws, customs and protocols. R27 Cite and acknowledge other relevant work appropriately and accurately. R19 Participate in peer review in a way that is fair, rigorous and timely and maintains the confidentiality of the content. R28 Ensure that the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) are considered at all stages of research involving animals and minimise the impacts on animals used in research and in so doing support the welfare and wellbeing of these animals. R20 R29 Report suspected breaches of the Code to the relevant institution and/or authority. research.curtin.edu.au Research Integrity Fact Sheet Version 1, 12/07/2018
3
Research Integrity Office Staff
Research Integrity Office Staff Responsible Conduct of Research Manager Research Integrity: Dr Catherine Gangell (Parental leave) / Gail Dixon Human Research Ethics Team Leader Ethics: Amy Bowater Clinical Trials Advisor: Anneli Robbshaw Senior Research Services Officer: Alina Dmitrieva Research Services Officers: Diana Della Costa, Heather Johnson, Pam Lee, Stephanie Holmquest Animal Research Ethics Animal Welfare Animal Welfare Officers: Dr Tara Pike, Dr Emily Barrick Animal Facility Manager Animal Facility: Dr Beng Chua Animal Technicians: Kodee King, Carolyn Doyle Hazardous Materials Biosafety and Defence Trade Control : Dr Bernadette Bradley Radiation Safety and Poisons : Ketesse Hansen This presentation will be made available to you so no need to write these contact details down The Research Integrity Team is here to provide assistance to help facilitate high quality research that is conducted with integrity and within the legislative framework. As an office we: provide training & specialised advice; promote and monitor compliance; and process applications for permits and approvals. Here are the staff who are available to assist you and your students You or your students can get help over the phone, by or in person with the office staff
4
Legislation Poisons Act Radiation Safety Act Gene Technology Act
Legislation Poisons Act Radiation Safety Act Gene Technology Act Biosecurity Act Defence Trade Controls Act National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research Animal Welfare Act Australian Code for the Care and use of Animals for Scientific Purposes Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research There are a number of legislative bodies that govern aspects of research and my office can help you and your students to understand and comply with the requirements
5
Policies and procedures
Policies and procedures There are a number of policies and procedures that outline how to do ethical research at Curtin There are a number of policies and procedures that outline how to do ethical research at Curtin These are found at Curtin University’s Research Management Policy Curtin University’s Responsible Conduct of Research Policy and procedures Authorship, Peer Review and Publication of Research Findings Policy and procedures Conflict of Interest Procedures Research Data and Primary Materials Policy These policies are currently being updated in line with the new guides to the Code and communication will come through Curtin Weekly advising once they have been updated
6
Research Integrity Training
Research Integrity Training All researchers at Curtin University must conduct research in accordance with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Training is provided on-line: iPerform for Staff Blackboard for Students Research Integrity Manual Research Integrity Advisers Research Integrity on-line training Is compulsory for all research staff as well as all HDR students For Milestone 1 Students should have completed Research Integrity training A Curtin Research Integrity Manual is available at the following link It includes a list of Faculty based Research Integrity Advisers who can provide advice to researchers with queries related to the Code
7
Hazard Identification Tool
Hazard Identification Tool For Milestone 1 Students should have done a HIT the purpose of which is to: Identify some of the hazards (biological, radiological, chemical, poisonous). As well as permissions (human or animal ethics approvals, defence trade controls, field work) Receive feedback telling you about the major State and Federal legislation that regulate the use of the hazards that you identify. Help you to seek the necessary approvals and prepare the risk assessment. When should it be used? At the very start of a HDR programme, before work commences. The student completes this but the result gets sent to you as well as the students so that you are able to confirm that all the necessary permissions and risk assessments are in place. As you go through the feedback with the student the HIT result will outline what needs to be done Section B covers ethics and approvals, animals, humans, Defense Trade Controls, Section C chemical safety, poisons, nanomaterials Section D Radiation safety Section E Biological safety Section F Other hazardous materials Students should also be encouraged to do a data management plan and an authorship agreement for any publications Online at
8
Human Research Ethics ROC-ethics@curtin.edu.au
Human Research Ethics Human research is conducted with or about people, or their data or tissue. - Taking part in surveys, interviews or focus groups - Undergoing psychological, physiological or medical testing or treatment - Being observed by researchers - The collection and use of participants’ body organs, tissues, fluids or exhaled breath - Researchers having access to the participants’ personal documents or other materials Access to participants’ information as part of an existing published or unpublished source or database All human research ethics enquiries If you are unsure about whether human ethics approval is required please contact one of the ethics officers who will be able to help you. – human research ethics enquiries If the appropriate approvals are not in place before the students commence data collection they will be unable to publish. If this is not the case the students theses and publications may have had to be redacted which could lead to allegations of research misconduct for the supervisor
9
Key Principles of Human Research
Key Principles of Human Research Respect for human beings Research merit and integrity Justice Beneficence Chapter 1.1 of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research The ethical relationship between researchers and research participants is founded on four key values: Respect for human beings: due regard for the welfare, beliefs, perceptions, customs and cultural heritage, both individual and collective, of those involved in research. Research merit and integrity: scientific validity of the project, and the potential benefit of the research carried out with a commitment to searching for knowledge and understanding. Justice: no unfair burden on groups, no exploitation, fair distribution of benefits, and the selection, exclusion and inclusion of participants is fair. Beneficence: benefit of the research conducted must justify any risks to participants.
10
Human Research Ethics Application Workflow
Human Research Ethics Application Workflow Application submitted 1-2 days Negligible risk Low risk Non-Low risk 2 weeks Review within the School/Faculty Advisory Committee (unless Candidacy has been approved) 1 week Review by Research Services Officers (Ethics) Review by Team Lead (Ethics) Note that the times are additive on the left hand side of the diagram so ethics approval needs to be applied for early as it must be in place before the research data collection commences The HREC meet 11 times per year approximately monthly and the advisory committee meet between meetings 4 weeks Human Research Ethics Committee
11
Animal Ethics Australian Code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes An animal is defined as “any live non-human vertebrate (that is, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, encompassing domestic animals, purpose-bred animals, livestock, wildlife) and cephalopods” Observational studies also require ethics approval The Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes 8th Edition (2013) (The Code) defines an animal as “any live non-human vertebrate (that is, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, encompassing domestic animals, purpose-bred animals, livestock, wildlife) and cephalopods (eg octopus)”. Any research involving animals will be subject to review by the Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) For observational studies you are required to obtain ethics clearance. You will need to complete an observational ethics application form. Studies are considered observational where animals are studied in their natural habitat. Studies are not considered observational if: Animals are taken out of their natural habitat even for a short period of time Animals are to be trapped Animals are baited to observe behaviour The animals natural habitat is disturbed Or if the animals are approached in a manner that may induce stress to the animal If using tissues for example from a butcher or abattoir no ethics approval is required with the important proviso that the animals were not killed for the purposes of research The use of tissue may represent a biohazard and it is worth contacting the hazardous materials team for advice on this
12
Animal Ethics Application Workflow
Animal Ethics Application Workflow Application submitted 3 R’s The replacement of animals with other methods The reduction in the number of animals used by good experimental design and use of statistics. The refinement of techniques used to reduce adverse impact. Up to 6 weeks Animal Ethics Committee 1 week For animal ethics approval the times are additive again so early application is needed in the case of animal research It is also advisable to talk to the animal facility staff to ensure that they have the appropriate cages, facilities and feed for the animals to be used Approval
13
Hazardous Materials & Equipment
Hazardous Materials & Equipment Chemical, Radiological and Biological Hazards Compliance requirements Permits, approvals, licences etc. Infrastructure requirements PC2, radioisotope lab etc. Depending on the type of work being done different approvals and licenses will be required again these can be time consuming and you are advised to seek advice from the hazardous materials team about how long things are likely to take For hazards the student will need to complete a risk assessment and their induction should include standard operating procedures, Personal Protective Equipment and any other special requirements If your student needs to work with something hazardous outside of your expertise you will need to arrange training for them in the relevant area
14
Radiation and Biosafety Application Workflow
Radiation and Biosafety Application Workflow Radiation Application submitted Biosafety Application submitted 1 week Assessment of compliance requirements Assessment of compliance requirements Up to 1 year Regulator Approval Regulator Approval 4 weeks Additive times again but some OGTR applications for example Dealings not intended for release DNIRs or dealings intended for release DIRs and field trials for genetically modified organisms can take 6 months or longer Radiation Safety Officer/Committee Institutional Biosafety Committee
15
Research Integrity website & resources This webpage has links to information for ethics as well as safety Students eed to be directed to go through the links and familiarise themselves with the relevant sections.
16
Applying for project approval - InfoEd
Applying for project approval - InfoEd Apply for and manage your approvals from Curtin’s : Animal Ethics Committee, Human Research Ethics Committee, Institutional Biosafety Committee, Radiation Safety Committee Students can submit the application but cannot be Chief Investigators - When a Student creates an application, they must assign a Staff member as the Chief Investigator. - They must add themselves as an investigator on the form to see the application. - They can find the application by searching for the record number in ‘quick find’. InfoEd: InfoEd help guides As the supervisor you will be the CI on any approvals that are applied for through InfoEd. It is advisable to read a word draft of the application and ensure that the student has all of the relevant documents before they submit to InfoEd. The research integrity team can help with applications as required
17
Links Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
Links Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC) Curtin University’s Research Management Policy Curtin University’s Responsible Conduct of Research Policy Animal Welfare Act (WA) 2002 Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes 8th ed
18
Thank you gail.dixon@curtin.edu.au
Thank you Thank you for your attention and please ask any questions or me
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.