Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Searches for atomic electric dipole moments
Matthew R. Dietrich Assistant Physicist Argonne National Laboratory
2
Electric Dipole Moments and Discrete Symmetries
Electric dipole moment (EDM): displacement vector from a particle’s center of mass to its center of charge. violates both P-parity (spatial inversion) and T-time reversal symmetries: Assuming the combination of C-charge conjugation (particle <-> antiparticle), P, and T is conserved: T-violation implies CP-violation EDMs are a very sensitive probe of CP-violation
3
EDM Sectors de CS CT gπ(0) gπ(1) đn Paramagnetic Diamagnetic Neutrons
ThO, YbF, Cs, Tl, Fr… Hg, Ra, Xe, TlF Sector Exp Limit (e-cm) Location Method Standard Model Electron 9 x 10-29 Harvard-Yale ThO molecules in a beam 10-38 Neutron 3 x 10-26 ILL UCN in a bottle 10-31 Nuclear 7 x 10-30 U. Washington 199Hg atoms in a cell 10-33 Remember to emphasize that the Standard Model limits are so small they are essentially zero.
4
Atomic edms The EDM of an atom would arise from one of its constituent parts, for example: The EDM of the electron Only in paramagnetic atoms The Schiff moment of the nucleus Paramagnetic or diamagnetic The Magnetic Quadrupole Moment of the nucleus Paramagnetic only Generally, the EDM of a paramagnetic atom is sensitive to all of the above mechanisms. Physical arguments are usually employed to establish one effect that dominates. In paramagnetic atoms and molecules, the electron is usually thought to dominate. Molecules are special because the E-field is fixed by the internal structure of the molecule. So their “EDM” isn’t linear in the applied field, like a proper EDM is. But the same principles hold for this “CP-violating frequency shift”.
5
Schiff Moments and EDMs
Leonard Schiff’s Theorem (1963): Any permanent dipole moment of the nucleus is perfectly shielded by its electron cloud True for point-like nuclei, non-relativistic electrons However, the “Schiff moment” is not shielded by this effect Zero for point-like, spherical nuclei Arises from deformations in the nucleus or its constituent nucleons Very large in nuclei with both a quadrupole and octupole deformation Now its interesting to note that you never actually can search for a nuclear EDM, per se. This is because the application of an electric field to a neutral atom causes the electron cloud to deform in a way that perfectly cancels the nuclear EDM. What Schiff realized in 1963 was that this is really only true for point-like nuclei; if the nucleus has a finite size, the cancelation will not be perfect across its entire volume. Thus, he contrived the “Schiff moment”, which is Schiff Moment Look for heavy nuclei with large quadrupole and octupole deformations! Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"
6
Techniques Standard disclaimer: Roughly speaking, and incomplete lists… Technique Pros Cons Examples Atomic Beam Large N Almost any species Short lifetime Large systematics “Small” applied E field Tl, ThO, YbF, TlF, YbOH Vapor cell Huge N Large lifetime Limited species Small applied E field Hg, Xe, Rn Cold Atom Long lifetime Large applied E field Small N Ra, Cs, Fr, Yb Trapped Ions Intermediate length lifetime(?) and N Limited species? Systematics??? HfF+ Condensed Matter Large N, Large Field, Large storage time Leakage current, systematics limited GGG, LiXe, Noble gas ice How to prepare and detect state of sample? How to create uniform and constant electric and magnetic fields?
7
What is common All EDM experiments must solve a few problems in common
How to collect a sample of identical particles Beam, vapor cell, cold atom trap, etc. How to prepare the spin Optical pumping, SEOP, magnetic filter, etc. How to isolate the spin while it precesses, to create the longest coherence time Magnetic shielding, low gradients, etc. How to detect the spin Optical, SQUID magnetometer, radioactive decay, etc.
8
What is common All EDM experiments must solve a few problems in common
How to collect a sample of identical particles How to prepare the spin How to isolate the spin while it precesses, to create the longest coherence time How to detect the spin The DiVincenzo criteria for quantum computation are A scalable physical system with well-characterized qubits The ability to initialize the state of the qubit Long relevant decoherence times A qubit-specific measurement capability Also: A universal set of quantum gates Quantum computation and precision measurement share technical challenges with some frequency, motivating the field of quantum sensors. Technics or devices can be shared for the betterment of both.
9
Beam experiments A cold, collimated beam of molecules is produced by buffer gas cooling The beam is then optically prepared and detected (usually) Because of Exv and the large gap size, maximum E field is generally limited Lifetimes measured in milliseconds
10
Molecules and edms 290 MV/cm 224 pm
F- 224 pm Nuclei experience fields of 100’s MV/cm, while the electron experiences 100’s GV/cm Ra+ Compare with 250 kV/cm in the new generation of electrodes This effect allows beam experiments to use low applied fields, yet still achieve good limits on the EDM (Courtesy ACME)
11
Molecules and edms 290 MV/cm 224 pm
F- 224 pm Nuclei experience fields of 100’s MV/cm, while the electron experiences 100’s GV/cm Ra+ Compare with 250 kV/cm in the new generation of electrodes ThO Harvard-Yale Electron YbF Imperial College YbOH Harvard, CalTech MQM RaF ANL Schiff TlF Yale, Columbia HfF+ Boulder
12
The Seattle mercury EDM Experiment
Properties of Hg-199 and experiment Stable Spin I=½ nucleus (no quadrupole moment) Nuclear T2 ~ seconds High Vapor Pressure at room temperature, 4*10^13 cm-3 High Z=80 Nearly spherical nucleus Glass cell limits E field to 10 kV/cm Leakage current through cell is leading systematic +e -e cm Unit EDM EDM(Hg-199) < 7 x e cm If Hg nucleus is size of earth, then this is two charges separated by 50 pm Griffith et al., Phys Rev Lett (2009) Graner et al., Phys Rev Lett (2016)
13
HeXe EDM experiment at BMSR-2 (Berlin)
129Xe EDM measurement using 3He comagnetometer Goal: 100x improvement on previous value, 𝑑(129Xe)=0.7±3× 10 −27 𝑒∙cm† Current status: Results from an initial 2017 measurement expected Fall 2018 Limited by statistics, not systematics Blinded 2017 EDM sensitivity comparable to Rosenberry and Chupp (2001) result Completed 2018 data collection, potentially 10x improvement in sensitivity Future: Improved SNR (better gas purity, increased polarization, lower SQUID noise with upgraded dewar) Improved systematic control (cell shape optimization, better leakage current monitoring, cell motion measurement) Increased electric field (higher gas pressure, bipolar HV) 10-100x improvement in EDM sensitivity † M. A. Rosenberry and T. E. Chupp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 22 (2001) Slide courtesy Natasha Sachdeva
14
|a |b Radium EDM (225Ra/199Hg ~ 3) - = (|a - |b)/2
A closely spaced parity doublet enhances the appearance of parity violating terms in the underlying Hamiltonian – Haxton & Henley (1983) - = (|a - |b)/2 + = (|a + |b)/2 55 keV A large quadrupole and octupole deformation results In an enhanced Schiff moment – Auerbach, Flambaum & Spevak (1996) |a |b Relativistic atomic structure weakens the Schiff theorem, resulting in a strong enhancement with increasing Z (225Ra/199Hg ~ 3) – Dzuba, Flambaum, Ginges, Kozlov (2002) C_T g(0) g(1) Ra/Hg 2 430 833 Ra/Xe 38 4200 23000 Ra/n ∞ .1 20 J. Engel et al., Progress in Particle and Nuclear Phys. (2013)
15
Radium Setup Ra(NO3)2+Ba Oven Transverse Cooling HV Electrodes Zeeman
Slower Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils h ~ 1.6*10^-6 (Low vapor pressure) For EDM: Ra-225 I = 1/2, J = 0 t1/2 = 15 days For Testing: Ra-226 I = 0, J = 0 t1/2 = 1600 yrs 226Ra MOT 200,000 atoms 40 mK 0.6 mm J. R. Guest et al., PRL (2007)
16
Transfer Atoms from MOT to “Bus” ODT
50 W 1550 nm Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils Translation Stage Lens 0.03 mm The first step towards a measurement for our case is to collect the Ra atoms. We do this using laser cooling and trapping techniques. Ra atoms come out of an oven at 450 deg C. The diverging beam of atoms is converted to a collimating beam using transverse laser cooling in what we call as transverse cooling chamber. The collimated beam of atoms is slowed Using a zeeman slower and the slow atoms are collected in a Magneto optical trap or MOT. The temperature of the atoms is about 40 uK. The first ever Ra MOT was realized by our group. This is a picture of our as seen on a CCD camera. MOT lifetime 25 seconds. MOT + ODT 80% Efficiency 0.6 mm
17
Transfer Atoms from “Bus” to “Holding” ODT
“Bus” ODT 50 W 1550 nm Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils Lens HV Electrodes 30 mG Now we can collect the atoms in a MOT but we can not do an EDM measurement in the MOT because of quadrupole magnetic fields of the MOT itself. So we need to move the atoms far away from these magnetic fields to a region we call science chamber region which is shielded from magnetic fields. We do this by using a single focused nm , 50 W laser beam which forms an Optical dipole trap. The laser comes along ( the red arrow) and focused on the MOT. The atoms are held at the focus of the beam. Just before I joined the group about a year and a half ago transfer of atoms from the MOT to the ODT was demonstrated. Once the atoms are in the ODT we can move it to the science chamber by moving the focus of the beam.(show animation) Glass Tube Vacuum chamber 10-11 Torr 70 kV/cm
18
Transfer Atoms from “Bus” to “Holding” ODT
“Bus” ODT 50 W 1550 nm Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils Standing Wave “Holding” ODT 10 W 1550 nm Lens Now we can collect the atoms in a MOT but we can not do an EDM measurement in the MOT because of quadrupole magnetic fields of the MOT itself. So we need to move the atoms far away from these magnetic fields to a region we call science chamber region which is shielded from magnetic fields. We do this by using a single focused nm , 50 W laser beam which forms an Optical dipole trap. The laser comes along ( the red arrow) and focused on the MOT. The atoms are held at the focus of the beam. Just before I joined the group about a year and a half ago transfer of atoms from the MOT to the ODT was demonstrated. Once the atoms are in the ODT we can move it to the science chamber by moving the focus of the beam.(show animation) Traveling Wave “Bus” ODT
19
Transfer Atoms from “Bus” to “Holding” ODT
“Bus” ODT 50 W 1550 nm Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils Standing Wave “Holding” ODT 10 W 1550 nm Lens Now we can collect the atoms in a MOT but we can not do an EDM measurement in the MOT because of quadrupole magnetic fields of the MOT itself. So we need to move the atoms far away from these magnetic fields to a region we call science chamber region which is shielded from magnetic fields. We do this by using a single focused nm , 50 W laser beam which forms an Optical dipole trap. The laser comes along ( the red arrow) and focused on the MOT. The atoms are held at the focus of the beam. Just before I joined the group about a year and a half ago transfer of atoms from the MOT to the ODT was demonstrated. Once the atoms are in the ODT we can move it to the science chamber by moving the focus of the beam.(show animation) Laser Cooling 100 mW 714 nm Laser Cooling and B Field Traveling Wave “Bus” ODT
20
Transfer Atoms from “Bus” to “Holding” ODT
Magnetic Shielding & Magnet Coils Standing Wave “Holding” ODT 10 W 1550 nm .5 mm Now we can collect the atoms in a MOT but we can not do an EDM measurement in the MOT because of quadrupole magnetic fields of the MOT itself. So we need to move the atoms far away from these magnetic fields to a region we call science chamber region which is shielded from magnetic fields. We do this by using a single focused nm , 50 W laser beam which forms an Optical dipole trap. The laser comes along ( the red arrow) and focused on the MOT. The atoms are held at the focus of the beam. Just before I joined the group about a year and a half ago transfer of atoms from the MOT to the ODT was demonstrated. Once the atoms are in the ODT we can move it to the science chamber by moving the focus of the beam.(show animation) ODTODT Transfer: 70% Efficiency 700 atoms Ra-225 .5 mm R. H. Parker et al., PRC 86, (2012) Absorption Imaging
22
EDM result M. Bishof et al. PRC 94, (2016)
23
dRa-225 = (4± 6stat ± 0.2syst) × 10-24 e-cm
EDM result dRa-225 = (4± 6stat ± 0.2syst) × e-cm dRa-225 < 1.4 × e-cm 95% C.L. M. Bishof et al. PRC 94, (2016)
24
Systematics Effect (e-cm) 2016 Measurement Improved Statstics
Co-magnetometer E-squared Effects 1×10-25 7×10-29 7×10-31 B-field Correlations 5×10-27 3×10-29 ODT Power Corr. 6×10-26 9×10-30 9×10-32 Stark Interference 2×10-27 Blue Power Corr. 7×10-28 1×10-31 Blue Freq. Corr. 4×10-28 8×10-30 E x v Effects 7×10-30 - Leakage Current 3×10-28 9×10-29 E-field Ramping 9×10-28 2×10-29 Geometric Phase 3×10-31 5×10-33 Total 2×10-25 4×10-29 M. Bishof et al. PRC 94, (2016)
25
Improvement 1: Increased Field
Previously: Copper Electrodes, E = 70 kV/cm Niobium electrodes newly installed: >200 kV/cm demonstrated (J. Singh/MSU, M. Kelly, T. Reid/ANL, M. Poelker/Jlab) Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. – Acc. and Beams, 15, (2012) Factor of ~4 increase in EDM Sensitivity Combined with improvement in detection efficiency (STIRAP) and increased source, we expect about 100 fold improvement in next measurement
26
Effect on Standard Model Extensions
BSM parameter CT gp(0) gp(1) đn (e cm) Current limits (95% CL) 2×10-6 8×10-9 1.2×10-9 1.2×10-22 Improvement Factor (over current limit) Current + 225Ra [10-25 e cm] 40 2 1.2 20 Current + 225Ra [10-26 e cm] 200 8 4 60 T. Chupp and M. Ramsey-Musolf, PRC 91, (2015) At the level available with those upgrades, radium will improve significantly on the global sensitivity for all parameters
27
Phase space in electron edm
T. Fleig, M. Jung, JHEP 2018: 12
28
Phase space in electron edm
T. Fleig, M. Jung, JHEP 2018: 12
29
sensitivities Global Limit Preliminary Ra-225 EDM (1-sigma e-cm)
Blue without new Xenon result Green with 3e-29 e cm Global Limit Preliminary Ra-225 EDM (1-sigma e-cm) Improved Xe result strengthens new Ra result, and vice versa
30
Two-Higgs Doublet 2HDM is a simple extension to the SM allowing for CP-violation and natural mechanisms for baryogenesis Radium has strong sensitivity to 2HDM, in spite of electroweak nature of theory Complementary to electron EDM, which exhibits interference LANL neutron EDM (Green) Future electron EDM (blue) Radium Blue Slower (yellow) 10^-27 e-cm S. Inoue, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Y. Zhang Phys. Rev. D 89, (2014) C.-Y Chen, H.-L Li, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 97, (2018)
31
Right-handed charged currents
Apparent tension in CP-violating parameters from Kaon decays could be explained by a right-handed charged weak current, which would be detectible with Hadronic EDM experiments Due to large theoretical uncertainties in Hg, present constraints on such a model are very weak The upcoming radium measurement will be sensitive to this possibility STIRAP + HV Blue Slower V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, and E. Mereghetti, Phys. Lett. B 767, 1 (2017) arXiv: v2
32
How to trap a molecule: photoassociation
If you can trap two different atoms in a MOT, why not just wait until they collide? The reaction is hugely exothermic! The newly formed molecule would be ejected from the trap Use light to form a more gentle reaction Excite diatom to electronically excited bound state The radiative decay carries away the excess energy Pro: molecule is already cold when created Con: both atoms in molecule have to be laser coolable See Timo Fleig’s talk next week
33
How to trap a molecule: Direct laser cooling
191 pm 220 pm Sr Sr Sr Valence electrons bind the molecule… Causing a change in bond length when excited… And vibrational excitations after relaxation. There are many possible final states, which makes laser cooling intractable
34
How to trap a molecule: Direct laser cooling
F- F- F- 220 pm 221 pm 220 pm Sr+ Sr+ Sr+ Fluorine is so polarizing, it steals one electron from strontium, leaving the second attached to the Sr… This second electron is the least tightly bound, and serves as the valence electron… So the bond length is unchanged during electronic excitation! Vibrations are rarely excited in this kind of molecule!
35
How to trap a molecule: Direct laser cooling
F- F- F- 220 pm 221 pm 220 pm Sr+ Sr+ Sr+ Nature 467, 820–823 (2010) Nature 512, (2014)
36
How to trap a molecule: Direct laser cooling
F O Sr Sr Nothing special about the fluorine, besides being very polar… So is OH! PRL 118, (2017) You can (usually) replace atoms with isoelectric atoms or groups and still get laser coolable molecules
37
Radium Molecules SrF is already known to be laser-coolable
Guess who is similar to strontium… Ra F Sr RaF is also thought to be laser coolable Phys. Rev. A 82, arXiv: atom-ph/ N F Ra Tl Or better yet a diamagnetic version
38
Radium Molecules SrF is already known to be laser-coolable
Guess who is similar to strontium… Ra F Sr ThO Harvard-Yale Electron YbF Imperial College YbOH Harvard, CalTech MQM RaF ANL Schiff TlF Yale, Columbia HfF+ Boulder RaF is also thought to be laser coolable Phys. Rev. A 82, arXiv: atom-ph/ N F Ra Tl Or better yet a diamagnetic version
39
Octupole deformation + molecule
The combination of huge internal molecular fields plus enhanced octupole deformation promise future experiments of tremendous sensitivity to new physics But the path is long Step 1: Spectroscopy. Start with stable barium as a proxy for radium.
40
Ion trap edm H. Loh et al., Science 342, 1220 (2013) An ion trap is formed with a hexapole, rotating electric field, and a DC magnetic quadrupole field, outwardly facing The ion and its polarization rotates around in a circle, always phase-locked to the direction of the magnetic field This requires that the molecule is very easily polarized (about 10 V/cm), placing somewhat demanding constraints on the electronic structure
41
Atom Trappers @ Argonne
+ Donald Booth, Josh Abney I hope I’ve given you a good overview of the kind of exciting physics possible with rare isotope atom traps, and how important it is for these projects to have access to facilities such as FRIB in order to achieve the very best limits. DOE Office of Nuclear Physics
42
sensitivities Global Limit Preliminary Ra-225 EDM (1-sigma e-cm)
Assuming new Xe result Global Limit Preliminary Ra-225 EDM (1-sigma e-cm)
43
EDM Measurements B
44
EDM Measurements B E
45
EDM Measurements B E
46
EDM Measurements B E
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.