1. Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms and International Portfolio Choice
Daniel Andrei
Gerzensee, June

2. 3. Benchmark Model & Solution method
1. Motivation
2. Literature
3. Benchmark Model & Solution method
4. Heterogeneous Firms
5. Conclusion & Discussion
1/15

3. World Market Capitalization
2/15

4. World Market Capitalization
U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005)
2/15

5. World Market Capitalization
U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005)
2/15

6. World Market Capitalization
U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005)
All investors should hold the market portfolio => U.S. investors should hold 40% of domestic equities
2/15

7. World Market Capitalization
True proportion of domestic equities in U.S. portfolios was 82% in 2005
U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005)
All investors should hold the market portfolio => U.S. investors should hold 40% of domestic equities
2/15

8. ? World Market Capitalization 2/15
HOME
EQUITY
BIAS
True proportion of domestic equities in U.S. portfolios was 82% in 2005 ?
U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005)
All investors should hold the market portfolio => U.S. investors should hold 40% of domestic equities
2/15

12. Potential Explanations
Hedging domestic risks
Costs and barriers for foreign investments
Information asymmetries
Corporate governance and transparency
Behavioral-based explanations
4/15

13. Potential Explanations
Hedging domestic risks
Costs and barriers for foreign investments
Information asymmetries
Corporate governance and transparency
Behavioral-based explanations
Recently, new methods have been developped to solve for optimal portfolios in DSGE models:
Devereux and Sutherland (2006), Tille and Van Wincoop (2007), Evans and Hnatkovska (2005)
4/15

14. Potential Explanations
Hedging domestic risks
Costs and barriers for foreign investments
Information asymmetries
Corporate governance and transparency
Behavioral-based explanations
Recently, new methods have been developped to solve for optimal portfolios in DSGE models:
Devereux and Sutherland (2006), Tille and Van Wincoop (2007), Evans and Hnatkovska (2005)
THIS PAPER: (1) Solve for optimal portfolios in a two-country DSGE model.
(2) Show how in a setup with heterogeneous firms and fixed export costs we can obtain home equity preference.
4/15

15. Some related literature:
Lucas (1982)
Uppal (1993)
Cole and Obstfeld (1991)
Baxter and Jermann (1997)
Obstfeld and Rogoff(2006)
Kollmann (2006)
Coeurdacier et. al. (2007)
Coeurdacier (2006)
Van Wincoop and Warnock (2007)
Hnatkovska (2005)
5/15

16. Some related literature:
Lucas (1982)
Uppal (1993)
Cole and Obstfeld (1991)
Baxter and Jermann (1997)
Obstfeld and Rogoff(2006)
Kollmann (2006)
Coeurdacier et. al. (2007)
Coeurdacier (2006)
Van Wincoop and Warnock (2007)
Hnatkovska (2005)
Extensions:
Heterogeneous firms
Non-tradable sector
Fixed costs to go to export
market
BENCHMARK
MODEL
Show the difficulties to explain the home equity bias
Show why we can obtain home equity bias
5/15

19. If goods are shipped to the another country, then a fraction τ is lost in transit (melting-iceberg trade costs)
Export
Export

20. Take difference:
7/15

21. Take difference:
Treat this temporarily as an exogenous i.i.d. variable
7/15

22. Treat this temporarily as an exogenous i.i.d. variable
7/15

23. Treat this temporarily as an exogenous i.i.d. variable
7/15

24. Treat this temporarily as an exogenous i.i.d. variable
7/15

25. => Closed form solution:
7/15

26. => Closed form solution:
7/15

27. DOMESTIC EQUITY HELD BY DOMESTIC RESIDENTS:
7/15

28. 8/15

29. 8/15

30. 8/15

31. 8/15

32. 8/15

33. 8/15

34. 8/15

35. 8/15

36. 8/15

37. 8/15

38. 9/15

39. 9/15

40. Heterogeneous Firms : Setup
Pareto Distribution with parameters zmin and k
Productivity
10/15

41. Heterogeneous Firms : Setup
Pareto Distribution with parameters zmin and k
Non-exporting firms
Exporting firms
Productivity
This firm will earn exactly zero export profits
10/15

42. 11/15

43. 11/15

44. 11/15

45. 11/15

46. 11/15

47. 12/15

48. Fixed export costs can vary => Incomplete Markets
13/15

49. Fixed export costs can vary Number of exporting firms can vary
=> Incomplete Markets
14/15

50. CONCLUSIONS
Re-confirm that proportional trade costs cannot lead to home bias.
Fixed export costs can help. The mechanism: decrease correlation between labor income and capital income.
Incomplete markets can help: more robust results and better outcomes in terms of VWW statistic and consumption – RER anomaly.
Show how a productivity shock can transform into a redistributive shock.
Introduce demand shocks into a more intuitive way.
15/15

51. Benchmark Model
Heterogeneous Firms Model