3. Project Name: This is the final name, and will be used in all future publications. (limit 60 characters)
Submitting Firm:
Client/ Owner:
(not necessarily a person, rather the agency or company that commissioned the project)

4. Project Location:
City:
State:

5. What was the entrant’s role in the project:
Click to add text

6. Construction Costs, Total Project Budget: Construction Costs, Total Project Actual:   Entrant’s Portion of Total Project Budget: (If a sub, this may be different than the total project cost)   Entrant’s Portion of Total Project Actual: (If a sub, this may be different than the total project cost)   Scheduled date of substantial completion: Actual date of substantial completion/use:

7. What was the entrant’s role in the project:
Click to add text

9. Role of the submitting firm’s Indiana personnel in the project:
Click to add text

10. Role of other consultants (if any/ optional) participating in the project:
Click to add text

11. Brief 100-120 word description of project:
Click to add text

13. 1. Original or innovative application of new or existing techniques Does the entry demonstrate the use of a new science or break-through in the general knowledge of engineering? Does the entry represent a unique application of different technology, techniques, materials or equipment? Did the entrant use any original or innovative approaches to meet the client’s time schedule?
Click to add text

14. 2. Future value to the engineering profession and perception by the public Will the entry redefine current engineering thinking? Does the entry advance a positive public image of engineering excellence?
Click to add text

15. 3. Social, economic and sustainable design considerations Do the solutions identified produce secondary benefits of value to the community environment? Does the entrant’s approach provide society with social, economic, or sustainable development benefits? Is public health, safety, or welfare significantly improved as a result of the entrant’s, and/or affected environment’s contribution to the project? Is it an economical and cost-effective solution that met or fell below the original budget estimate?
Click to add text

16. 4. Complexity Did the entry successfully address very complex criteria or unique problems? Were extraordinary problems of site, location, hazardous conditions, project requirements, or similar elements present? Did the entry require the use of out-of-the-ordinary technology or ingenuity for achievement of the project’s goals?
Click to add text

19. Insert image to use in awards presentation and promotional material
Image 1: Photo Caption
Insert image to use in awards presentation and promotional material

20. Image 2: Photo Caption

21. Image 3: Photo Caption

22. Image 4: Photo Caption

23. Image 5: Photo Caption

24. Image 6: Photo Caption