1. Joel Smith v. Emerald Drilling Company
WHY ARE WE HERE?
Joel Smith v. Emerald Drilling Company

2. Big and important case Simple case Serious injury on an offshore rig
WHY ARE WE HERE?
Big and important case
Simple case
Serious injury on an offshore rig

3. Joel Smith v. Emerald PURPOSE OF VOIR DIRE
Identify the issues and law governing this case
Have the jurors disclose their views, opinions, and attitudes regarding the issues and the law
Identify jurors with strongly held views and opinions
There are NO RIGHT OR WRONG ANSWERS

4. Bad Experience with Justice
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Bad Experience with Justice
Because of a bad experience with the civil justice system or otherwise, will you more than likely end up viewing the evidence through trial and during deliberations from the defendant’s point of view? 4

5. Offshore Oil Rig in Foreign Water
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Offshore Oil Rig in Foreign Water
How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
A rig operated off the coast of a foreign country should be as safe as possible.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

6. Joel Smith v. Emerald Offshore Oil Rig
How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
An offshore rig should be operated as safely as possible.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree 6

7. Joel Smith v. Emerald Language Barrier
How strongly do you agree with this statement:
If rig workers do not speak the same language, it is more likely to result in someone getting seriously hurt or injured.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

8. Joel Smith v. Emerald Boss Responsibility
How strongly do you agree with this statement:
If a rig boss participates in the meeting where decisions were made that result in an injury, the boss is responsible.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

9. Joel Smith v. Emerald Boss Responsibility
How strongly do you agree with this statement:
“The buck stops here” for the boss.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree 9

10. Doing Job as He Was Trained
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Doing Job as He Was Trained
How strongly do you agree with this statement:
If a person is doing his job as he was trained and gets hurt, it is not his fault.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree 10

11. Damages for Mental Anguish and Pain & Suffering
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Damages for Mental Anguish and Pain & Suffering
Even if the judge instructs you that the law allows you to award money for mental anguish and pain and suffering, and the evidence support it, you could not award money for those damages. 11

12. Higher Standard for Certain Damages
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Higher Standard for Certain Damages
Even if the Court instructs you that the burden of proof is preponderance of evidence in civil cases, you personally would require a higher burden of proof before awarding money for mental anguish or pain and suffering. 12

13. Joel Smith v. Emerald DAMAGES
If the facts justify a large damages award, how uncomfortable or comfortable would you feel awarding millions of dollars in damages?
Very Uncomfortable Very Comfortable

14. Higher Standard for Large Award
Joel Smith v. Emerald
Higher Standard for Large Award
Even if the Court instructs you that the burden of proof is preponderance of evidence in civil cases, you personally would require a higher burden of proof before awarding millions of dollars in damages, even if the evidence supports the award. 14

15. CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY
Joel Smith v. Emerald
CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY
How strongly do you agree with this statement:
It is very important that a company be held accountable for their conduct.
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree