Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°.
Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Conventional design: Real part of the scattered electric field (A) and total power density distribution (D). Lossy design: Real part of the scattered electric field (B) and total power density distribution (E). Active design: Real part of the scattered electric field (C) and total power density distribution (F). Ana Díaz-Rubio et al. Sci Adv 2017;3:e Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).


Download ppt "Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google