2. COMPARABILITY FACTORS COUNTRIES
DATABASES
HOURS
Our databases cover royalty rates,  loan interest rates  and service fees.
We spend 1-3 hours
analyzing each agreement
so that the client doesn’t have to.
COMPARABILITY FACTORS
COUNTRIES
Each agreement is analyzed
for up to 50
comparability factors.
Our databases are used  by organizations globally.

3. DEMPE analytics tool
Our DEMPE analytics tool carries out real-time calculations to help with your DEMPE functional analysis. It shows you (as a percentage) how much each group entity within your organization contributes to the profit-generating value of the intangible in question. This enables you to determine what proportion of the resulting income each group entity is entitled to.

4. Credit rating estimation tool
Our credit rating estimation tool allows you to calculate the credit rating of the borrower in the tested transaction based on company financials (e.g. current assets or retained earnings).

5. Our data saves you time
One of the main advantages of RoyaltyRange is that our data does not require much additional work from your side. Our high-quality and consistent data saves you time and increases the productivity of your research and deliverables.
What are the benefits?
Our data is fully compliant with the OECD BEPS requirements and US regulations.
Each agreement is manually analyzed for up to 50 comparability factors.
The database includes detailed functional, risk, cost and asset analyses.
Our data is fully analyzed, clean, structured and manually prepared for each agreement.
We do not include duplicates, redacted agreements, undisclosed remuneration terms or remuneration types other than percentages.
Parties to the agreements are checked for independence.
All information is provided in Excel or Word, together with links to original sources and PDF documents.
The data is continually improving through constant usage, double-checking and new information.
An easy-to-perform analysis can be completed in a matter of hours by accepting or rejecting agreements that have already been analyzed, and double-checking them for quality.
The data we provide is used for a number of purposes, including:
Transfer pricing analyses
Valuation of intangibles
Benchmarking studies
Patent Box analyses
Introducing royalty payments
Setting royalty rates
Drafting license agreements
Determining common agreement terms
Expert testimony and litigation
Consulting 3

6. Our clients
We provide premier-quality data to industry- leading multinational enterprises, global consulting companies, international law firms, government authorities and universities. 6

7. I. Database search
I. Royalty RATES 7
© 2018 RoyaltyRange

8. Royalty rates database – search filters
Keywords
NACE industrial classification
SIC industrial classification
Intellectual property type
Term of the license
Search by the parties
Exclusivity
Industry
Geographical scope
Royalty base
Royalty rate
Full-text search
Boolean search
Royalty rates database – search filters

9. Royalty rates database – comparability factors
Type of intellectual property
Quality control
Industry description
Unsuccessful R&D risks
Licensor
Unsuccessful marketing risks
Licensor’s activities
Product obsolescence risks
Licensee
Infringement risks
Licensee’s activities
Product liability risks
Object description
Functions costs
Geographical scope
Risks costs
Agreement date
Other party costs
Effective date
R&D costs
Cessation date
Marketing costs
Duration terms
Employee knowledge
Product limitation
Transfer type – rights
Exclusivity
Transfer type – intangibles
Usage restrictions
Transfer type – with goods
Legal protection
Royalty rates
Useful life
Base
Development stage
Other payments
Enhancements
Compensation details
Future benefits
Document title
R&D functions
Links to original sources
Marketing functions
Patent/trademark number
R&D control
Patent/trademark synopsis
Protection of intangibles
Patent/trademark image
Royalty rates database – comparability factors

10. II. Quantitative screening. Qualitative Screening.
II (I) The main reasons for rejecting Primary reports are the following:
Agreements involving non-comparable types of products;
Non-comparable characterisation of the transaction involving intangibles;
Non-comparable royalty calculation base;
Agreements were concluded with individual, non-profit entity or between related parties.
II (II) The main reasons for rejection of potentially comparable Final reports are the following:
Agreements involved complex future arrangements;
Agreements involved significant value equity compensation or ownership transfer.
I. Royalty RATES 10
© 2018 RoyaltyRange

11. II (I) Quantitative screening.

12. II (II) Qualitative screening.

13. III. Financial Analysis

14. Thank you! +12124613673 +442037347558 +32479719025 RoyaltyRange
387 Park Avenue South,
138 South Street,
Brussels EU Commission, 6th floor,
5th floor,
Romford,
New York, 10016,
RM1 1TE,
Rond Point Schuman 6,
United States
United Kingdom
Brussels, 1040,
Belgium