1. BRIEFING ON THE ADJUSTMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL BASIC EDUCATION
STANDING COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
23 November 2018

2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Readiness to effectively and efficiently spend any additional allocations as per the 2018 adjustments process
Virements – There were no virements needing Parliament approval
Summary of non-financial performance at the end of the 2nd quarter as well as reasons and remedial measures for under/over spending and under performance
Budget vs Expenditure to date, and explanations of material variances

3. Mawushe JSS- Picture 1-
Ngonyama JPS - Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 2 3

4. READINESS TO SPEND ADDITIONAL ALLOCATIONS AS PER THE 2018 ADJUSTMENT PROCESS [up to 20 November 2018]
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED = R800m
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE,
INITITIAL BUDGET: R1,471,826,000
ADD: ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION: R800,000,000
= POST-ADJUSTMENT BUDGET: = R2,271,826,000
LESS: EXPENDITURE TO 20 NOVEMBER 2018: R1,134,264,000
LESS: PROJECTED EXPENDITURE TO YEAR END: R1,232,175,000
PROJECTED SHORTFALL AT YEAR-END: = R94,613,000
THE ABOVE CALCULATIONS ARE AN INDICATION THAT THE ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION WILL BE SPENT ON PROJECTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

5. Inxu JSS - Picture 1-
Xuba JSS - Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 2 5

6. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: EXPENDITURE AND PERFORMANCE
ASIDI
CUMMULATIVE PREVIOUS Q2 PERFORMANCES (EXPENDITURE)
Expenditure on BAS
2016/2017
Percentage
2017/2018
2018/2019
Yearly Budget
R ,232,375,000.00
R ,757,984,000.00
R ,471,826,000.00 Q1
R ,624,669.51 5%
R ,272,762.94 7%
R ,313,264.81
14% Q2
R ,657,906.57 8%
R ,045,773.36
19%
R ,934,201.40
40%
Cummulative (Q1 + Q2)
R ,282,576.08
13%
R ,318,536.30
26%
R ,247,466.21
54%
ASIDI
CUMMULATIVE PREVIOUS Q2 PERFORMANCES (DELIVERY)
Sub-Programme
Completed since Inception
Financial Year 2016/17
Financial Year 2017/18
Current Financial Year 2018/19
Q1 + Q2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Inapp Structures
210 9 4 5 1 6 7 3 16 8
Sanitation
590 2 15 17 14
111 34 77
Water
796 27 11 18 12
Electricity
372 32
Electricity Scope Completed

7. Summary of non-financial performance at the end of the 2nd quarter as well as reasons and remedial measures for under/over spending and under performance

8. SIYAVUYA JSS

9. 2018/19 PRELIMINARY Q2 SCORE-CARD/STATUS BAR FOR INDICATORS
Programme
No. of indicators per programme
Annual Targets
Quarterly Targets
Bi-annual Targets
Q2 status 2018/19
Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
One 3 2 1 -
Two 19 11 6* 5
Three 10 8
Four
Five 4
Total distribution 47 33 12
2/14
1/14
11/14
Percentage distribution
100%
70%
26% 4%
14% 7%
79%
*indicator is recorded as a bi-annual reporting cycle in the APP however measured on a quarterly reporting cycle due to its targets being in Q1 and Q2
All Annual Targets are WHITE unless fully achieved.
Where 50% of the target has not been achieved, the status is reflected as RED.
Where 50% or more of the target has been realised, the status is reflected as AMBER.
Where the target has been fully achieved, the status is reflected as GREEN. 9

10. PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
ANNUAL TARGET
QUARTER 1 TARGET
QUARTER 1 VALIDATED
OUTPUT
QUARTER 2 TARGET
QUARTER 2 REPORTED OUTPUT
REASON FOR DEVIATION
REMEDIAL ACTION/ MEASURES
1.1.1
Percentage of Service providers within the procurement unit paid within 30 days.
100%
(Quarterly)
96%
(215/224)
98.8%
(422/427)
Inv. BMS05164: Actual Inv. Receipt date was captured incorrectly, 10/07/2018 instead of 10/08/2018
Inv : Payment was authorised on the 30th day.
Inv. 34: Payment delayed by incomplete delivery.
Department has developed Invoice days tracker tool to trace number of days from the time invoice is received by the Department until it is authorized on the system.

11. PROGRAMME 2: CURRICULUM POLICY, SUPPORT AND MONITORING
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
ANNUAL TARGET
QUARTER 1 TARGET
QUARTER 1 VALIDATED
OUTPUT
QUARTER 2 TARGET
QUARTER 2 REPORTED OUTPUT
REASON FOR DEVIATION
REMEDIAL ACTION/ MEASURES
2.4.4
Number of training sessions of CAPS for Technical subjects monitored
14 (Bi-annually) 7 2
This is a specialised training and is done by skills training centres through Service Level Agreements (SLAs). In 2018 provinces delayed to sign these SLAs.
DBE has put systems in place to monitor the signing of these SLAs. One of them is the Recovery Plan.
2.5.2
Number of advocacy campaigns conducted on the Rural Education Policy in the provinces 9
(Quarterly) 3
The policy has not yet been finalised. The policy was presented at CEM and concerns were raised regarding the potential legal implications of the policy in view of the already constrained resources of the sector.
CEM recommended that the principles contained in the policy be considered at HEDCOM for inclusion in the guidelines on the improvement of Rural Education

12. Langeni PS- Picture 1-
Mbekweni HS - Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 2

13. ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONS Expenditure as % of Appropriation
ALLOCATION AGAINST ACTUAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE 2018/19 FINANCIAL YEAR [up to 20 November 2018]
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONS
2018/19
Expenditure as % of Appropriation
POST-ADJUSTMENT
APPROPRIATION
ACTUAL EXPENDITURE
VARIANCE
R’000
Compensation of Employees
68.12%
Examiners and Moderators
26 692
15 989
10 703
59.90%
Transfers to Public Entities
36 135
75.07%
Other Transfers
19 217
98.51%
Conditional Grants
79.10%
Schools Infrastructure Backlogs Indirect Grant
49.93%
Earmarked Funds
67.36%
Departmental Operations
82 965
59.52%
Office Accommodation
83 140
57.90%
Projects
88 547
39.31%
Total
75.79% 13

14. REASONS FOR MATERIAL DEVIATIONS
DEVIATION ITEM
EXPLANATIONS FOR DEVIATIONS
Transfers to Public Entities, Transfers and
Other transfers:
Conditional Grants
Schools Infrastructure Backlogs Indirect Grant
Projects
The high spending to Public entities is due to 3 of the 4 annual transfers already done.
100% transfers done for Funza Lushaka bursaries.
Transfers already done for the 3 Quarters
Projected spending for remainder of the year shows R1,232,175,000, which exceeds the current balance by R94m
Underspending is due to slow spending of National Assessments. The Department has for the first time administered a pilot study on the implementation of re-design Systemic Evaluation model from 15 to 19 October Tests were developed according to an Internationally recognised matrix design. 40 learners in Grades 3, 6 and 9 per school will be selected across 9 provinces to participate in the testing. The spending on this item will increase in the third and fourth quarter when invoices are received and processed. 14

15. RWANTSANA JSS
Picture 1
NDOTSHANGA Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 2 15