Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmber Sutherland Modified over 11 years ago
1
Effect of Fuel Quality and Engine Technology on Particle Emissions
2
F. Giavazzi, G. Martini, R. Carbone
Contributors P. Dilara, R. Hummel, G. De Santi DG-JRC, Environment Institute, Ispra, Italy F. Giavazzi, G. Martini, R. Carbone Agip Petroli CREA, Milan, Italy A. Krasenbrink DLR-IVF, Berlin, Germany
3
Objectives To assess: the effect of fuel quality and engine technology on particulate emissions and in particular on the total mass of the emitted particles , on their mass/size distribution and number/size distribution the influence of the measurement method and the location of sample extraction on the test results the relation between number of particles and mass of particulates the relation between the legislative emission test results and the constant speed test results
4
Test Matrix 2 Modern 1.9L Diesel Passenger Cars 2 Fuel Qualities
Direct Injection Rotary Pump (SI) Common Rail (CR) Emission level: Euro II 2 Fuel Qualities Standard fuel, current quality (2000 specifications) (SF) “Clean” Fuel: Sulphur-free, low aromatics, low density (CF) Test conditions NEDC Constant Speed: Idle, 30, 50, 120 km/h
5
Instrumentation Standard Emission Racks Particulates NOx, CO, HC
Filters Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) Low Pressure Impactors (LPI-11 and LPI-8) The LPI-11 was used to measure the mass/size distribution of the diluted exhaust gas sampled from the conventional dilution tunnel The LPI-8 was used to measure the mass/size distribution of the raw exhaust gas sampled directly from the tailpipe
6
Instrumentation - Sampling Points
Particulate Filters To Vent CVS Unit Ambient Air SMPS LPI-11 LPI-8
7
NEDC Cycle- Regulated Emissions
8
NEDC Cycle - Total Particulate Mass Filter vs Impactor (g/km)
Rotary Pump Vehicle
9
NEDC Cycle - Total Particulate Mass Filter vs Impactor (g/km)
Common Rail Vehicle
10
NEDC Cycle - Mass/Size Distribution Fuel Quality Effect
Common Rail Vehicle
11
NEDC Cycle - Mass/Size Distribution Fuel Quality Effect
Rotary Pump Vehicle
12
NEDC Cycle - Mass/Size Distribution Engine Technology Effect
Standard Fuel “Clean” Fuel
13
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution Idle
14
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution 32 km/h
15
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution 50 km/h
16
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution 120 km/h
17
Total Particulate Mass Effect of test conditions and effect of fuel quality
Rotary Pump Vehicle Common Rail Vehicle
18
Mass/Size Distribution Mass Median Diameter (MMD)
19
Constant Speed - Total Mass (Impactors) LPI-8 (Raw Exhaust) vs LPI-11 (Diluted Exhaust)
20
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution LPI-8 (Raw Exhaust) vs LPI-11 (Diluted Exhaust) 32 km/h
Common Rail Vehicle
21
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution LPI-8 (Raw Exhaust) vs LPI-11 (Diluted Exhaust) 120 km/h
Common Rail Vehicle
22
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution LPI-8 (Raw Exhaust) vs LPI-11 (Diluted Exhaust) 32 km/h
Rotary Pump Vehicle
23
Constant Speed - Mass/Size Distribution LPI-8 (Raw Exhaust) vs LPI-11 (Diluted Exhaust) 120 km/h
Rotary Pump Vehicle
24
Constant Speed - Number/Size Distribution 32 km/h
25
Constant Speed - Number/Size Distribution 120 km/h
26
Constant Speed Tests Particle Number (SMPS) vs Mass (LPI-11)
27
CONCLUSIONS The effects of fuel quality and engine technology were more or less pronounced or not even detected; different conclusions can be drawn... …depending on the measuring method, sampling location and test condition Current vehicle exhaust emission standards are based on mass measurement of PM that has proved to be quite simple and reliable Much more work is needed before new measures such as particle number can be proposed as a reliable supplement to mass measurements
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.