1. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid 0 1 Supervisors’ Seminar Voksenåsen, 19 March 2013 Critical Reflection – understanding and tools Ivar Frounberg, the Norwegian Academy of Music Nina Malterud, the Steering Committee

2. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – status (1) Revised regulations 2008 introducing the four criteria, open form/format: Personal artistic position/work in relation to chosen subject area nationally and internationally; How the project contributes to professional development of the subject area; Critical reflection on the process (artistic choices and turning points, theory applied, dialogue with various networks and the professional environment etc.); Critical reflection on results (self-evaluation in perspective of the revised project description)

3. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – status (2) 21 reflections delivered since revision 2008 18 passed 30-200 pages text and attachments (scores, etc) 2 web, 1 radio programme style, 2 video essays

4. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – status (3) Steering Committee looking at the framework for the critical reflection (revisions end of 2014?) Format, forms What sort of reflective practices? (mapping) Content Target group Conveying insight based on artistic practice? Assessment committee’s reports Part of the whole

5. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – future intentions Keeping the open format – or? Text conventions – useful tools? Develop the relation between the reflection and the art work Develop the position of the reflective artist

6. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – fellows’ seminars Revised obligatory parts from 2011, according to the National Qualification Framework Seminar 1: Artistic Research, history, status etc Seminar 2: Project Development and Critical Reflection • 3 days relating to fellows’ individual projects, led by former fellow, examples from previous reflections Seminar 3: Ethical challenges, Copyright etc Seminar 4: Artistic/reflective development in the project

7. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Reflections – for whom? Paid by the society: a public document! publicly accessable! For the eternity? – Anyone? – Someone? Appraisal committee Peer community The target group points towards formal and genre issues (this afternoon)

8. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Peer community? Artistic research versus research on the arts Art community: visual arts, performing arts Music peers: a unity? Creation versus performance Composers: classical versus experimental? Performers: interpretation versus co-creative? Individuals versus the institutions Scope and detailing

9. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples (1) Take position, address the target group (Slotte)

10. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – Caroline Slotte

11. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples (2) Take position, address the target group (Slotte) For specialist peers? (Thelin): bass-players and/or composers?

12. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – Håkon Thelin

13. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples (3) Take position, address the target group (Slotte) For specialist peers? (Thelin) bass-players and/or composers? For the interested public? (Slåttebrekk)

14. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – Sigurd Slåttebrekk

15. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples (4) Take position, address the target group (Slotte) For specialist peers? (Thelin) bass-players and/or composers? For the interested public? (Slåttebrekk) Pedagogical approach (A. Aase)

16. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – Andreas Aase

17. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – Trygve Diesen Video essay: http://vimeo.com/channels/swimmingwithsharks http://vimeo.com/channels/swimmingwithsharks

18. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples (5) Take position, address the target group (Slotte) For specialist peers? (Thelin) bass-players and/or composers? For the interested public? (Slåttebrekk) Pedagogical approach (A. Aase) Forgetting the fundamental question(s)?

19. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ”Best Practice” – examples where? Håkon Thelin www.haakonthelin.com Sigurd Slåttebrekk www.chasingthebutterfly.no CarolineSlotte http://www.khib.no/norsk/om-khib/biblioteket/khib- stipendiatenes-kritiske-refleksjoner-e-format/ Trygve Diesen http://vimeo.com/channels/swimmingwithsharks Alle (kommer etter hvert på www.artistic-research.no) http://ge.tt/5AX0MmT

20. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ? Questions for the groups (1) How to relate the reflective work and the creative work during the whole project? What difference could it make for the reflection to start by defining the target group?

21. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid 0 2 Supervisors’ Seminar Voksenåsen, 19 March 2013 Critical Reflection – understanding and tools Ivar Frounberg, the Norwegian Academy of Music Nina Malterud, the Steering Committee

22. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection Format – medium and characteristics of media Form – structure Genre – text mode

23. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – formats Text understood in its broadest sense: Tekstbased publication (printed) Examples Inserted medium: CD/DVD/??? Intermedial presentation (web?) Oral and visual dialogue (film?) References? Other potential formats not yet explored?

24. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – form Structure – use of genres Disposition: Parts and wholes Content Abstract Relate to Artistic Result Corpus: reporting, reflecting References versus Bibliography Unified or a compilation

25. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – genres (1) Journal/log Report Manual Article ’Scientific paper’ Publication article Essay ManualManual ArticleArticle

26. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – genres (2) Storytelling Travelogue («reiseskildring») Manifesto Letter App Research Catalogue (Overlap/fusions)

27. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – does and dont’s The volume: not more than --- pages? The ”I”. Subjective, personal, private Personal positioning How much about the ”fight against the others” The outer pressure from the institution/system Inner enemies, resistance of writing «Science» as enemy

28. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid Critical reflection – does and dont’s Postulates Singular determined form: ”the science” Referencing – consequences in the text Referencing conventions Depth in referencing: the Adorno – syndrome

29. 0 Program for kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ? Questions for the groups (2) What format, form and genre(s) could be suitable for your fellow’s project How to solve practical problems with language (being non-native supervisor for a project in native language) Could your fellow benefit from supervision from more angles (theoretical vs. artistic competence). Collaborative supervision?