Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKailyn Reaver Modified over 10 years ago
1
Extrapolating the Dutch Experience Kees Schotten Wideke Boersma Camiel Heunks
2
Demand for information 5th Memorandum on physical planning Possible spatial developments given social and economic drivers and ongoing spatial policy “Distance to target” to policy targets or societal aims related to economy, ecology and social structure The pro’s and con’s of various spatial principles
3
Spatial allocation Autonomous spatial developments Spatial policy for collective forms of land use INPUT (Starting point) AUTONOMOUS ECONOMIC SCENARIOS Economic Growth (Industry and Agriculture) Demographic developments Land Use claims fit in the available area ? ANALYSIS Capacity of the area (The Netherlands) Effects ecology, social/ cultural, economy
5
Starting point 3 AUTONOMOUS SCENARIOS
6
Capacity : “ The claimed area is 46 000 ha more then available!”
7
Spatial allocation of land use Spatial alternatives Driving forces Economic strong land use forms replace weaker land use forms Corrective forces Policy for Nature, Landscape, Recreation and Environment Effects
8
Policy assumptions behind land use change 1995 - 2020 1995 -2010 Residential areas : 4th memorandum practice; not inside natural areas Industry : None Infra : Realisation of the Long Term Infrastructure policy (MIT99) Natuur : Realisation Ecological Network (EHS) Agriculture: None 2010 - 2020 Residential areas : Autonomous developments; not inside natural areas Industry : None Infra : Realisation 1a, 2, and 3 projects of MIT99 Natuur : Total realisation Ecological Network (EHS) Agriculture: None
9
Foreseen Ecological Network in 2020 Existing natural areas New natural areas
10
Chances for the development of residential areas for Randstad Holland based on historical trends (1980 - 1995) Autonomous developments
11
The model
13
ThemeIndicator Natural area Coherency nature Fauna Flora Use of energy (CO2) N surplus in groundwater Deposition ammonia Water depleted natural area Proximity recreation Quality of recreation Quieting in Landscape Openness Landscape Historical value Landscape Flooding risk Water surplus Commuting by car Commuting by train Nature Environment Recreation Landscape Safety Mobility -40-200204060 Present-2020
14
The Dutch experience: Conclusion The effects are for a large part determined by the spatial principles This urges to evaluate spatial alternatives Many methodological and practical problems to solve: Data, etc Main problem will be the growing complexity of this type of integrated assessments
15
Expanding the Dutch experience
16
Scale levels National / Regional: learning of each other experiences Regional / Cross border: inclusion of european driving forces in national simulations Europe: simulation on a European scale
17
The impact of cross bordereffects on the Netherlands
20
Simulation result:
21
Effectindicator on biodiversity
22
Final Conclusions Main advantage is the quantification of the effects of different spatial alternatives, supporting open and clear evaluation Main methodogical problem will be the growing complexity of this type of integrated assessments Land use simulation on an European scale level: Keep it simple select only a few effect indicators Focus analyses on the main driving forces Select a few test sites throughout Europe : to gain fundamental understanding of driving forces to stratify Europe on basis of demand of land and driving forces
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.