Download presentation
Published byAlyssa Parker Modified over 11 years ago
1
Use of Pain Tools for Pain Assessment Sherry Nolan MSN, RN 2009
FACES, FLACC, and N-PASS-- The 3 Approved Tools for CHLA
2
Pain Assessment: Background
American Pain Society - “Quality Assurance Standards for Relief of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain.” Agency for Health Care Policy & Research guidelines,1990 TJC – The Joint Commission standards All these agencies mandate the need for objective assessment and treatment of pain in all patients
3
JCAHO Standards Pain Assessment
The following must be included: Intensity, Location, Quality Alleviating, Aggravating Factors Pain history, treatment regimen & effectiveness Impact of pain on daily life
4
TJC Standards (Cont.) Hospital commitment to pain management
Information about pain management provided to patient/families Discharge plan for pain management
5
Pain Assessment: Definition
McCaffery’s definition of pain: “whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever he or she says it does.” Patient self-report measures are the gold standard Healthcare providers and parents underrate children’s pain
6
Pain History Starts with hx of pain episode Includes onset & location
Radiation and duration Quality or description Severity/intensity /frequency Exacerbating/precipi-tating/alleviating factors Impact on adl
7
Pain Assessment: History
Admission Data Base Must include info on current and past pain Words used for pain Should be clarified and documented for clarity Note social, cultural & spiritual influences that may affect the patient’s pain experience. If pain is present on admission or at any time, implement the standardized MPC for acute pain.Don’t forget the teaching section! Separate MPC for SCD crisis/& teaching section
8
Pain Assessment : History (Cont.)
When pain is present, always ascertain its: Quality Intensity Location Aggravating Factors Alleviating Factors
9
Pain Assessment: Potential Causes of Pain
Preoperative/postoperative Pain crisis Acute, chronic, or episodic pain Procedural pain Other examples: Th??????ink of your own examples…….
10
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
Goals: to identify intensity of pain to establish a baseline assessment to evaluate pain status to evaluate effects of intervention meeting professional,ethical, and regulatory requirements
11
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
Before using a pediatric pain tool…. Assess developmental level Can child verbalize pain? Can child use pain rating scale? Use the water test Use the appropriate scale
12
Pain Tools approved for use at CHLA
FLACC FACES N-PASS Verbal Self-report limited to the visually impaired
13
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC scale has 5 categories: F = Face L = Legs A = Activity C = Cry C = Consolability For preverbal or nonverbal children from infancy to 7 years
14
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC Face Scoring 0 = no particular expression or smile 1 = occasional grimace or frown, withdrawn, disinterested 2 = frequent to constant quivering of chin, clenched jaw
15
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC Legs Scoring 0 = normal position or relaxed 1 = uneasy, restless, tense 2 = kicking, or legs drawn up
16
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC Activity Scoring 0 = lying quietly, normal position, moves easily 1 = squirming, shifting back and forth, tense 2 = arched, rigid, or jerking
17
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC Cry Scoring 0 = no cry (awake or asleep) 1 = moans or whimpers; occasional complaint 2 = crying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints
18
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
FLACC Consolability Scoring 0 = content, relaxed 1 = reassured by occasional touching, hugging or being talked to, distractible 2 = difficult to console or comfort
19
FLACC Scale
20
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
Wong/Baker FACES Scale For children aged 3 to young adults Cartoon faces from 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst) Use script to administer first few times Now on white boards in all rooms
21
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scales
Verbal Self-Report For patients who are visually impaired only Ask to rate pain on a scale of zero indicating “no pain” and ten indicating “worst possible pain”
22
Pain Assessment: Pain Rating Scores and Treatment
Interventions are based on scores Intervention for pain score of >3 Reassess within 1 hour of intervention
23
Pain Assessment: Policies and Procedures
Refer to Policy & Procedure: “Pain Management & Assessment of Pain in Neonates, Infants, Children, Adolescents and Young Adults”COP-8”
24
Additional Web Links Comparison of Pediatric Pain tool
Pediatric Pain Management U Mich
25
N-PASS
26
Golden Rule of Neonatal Pain Management
Pain should be presumed in all neonates in all situations that are usually identified as painful in adults or children Pain treatment should be instituted in all cases where pain is presumed
27
Actual or potential causes of pain
Peritonitis Fractures Renal stones Noxious environment Damaged skin integrity Surgical procedures Invasive/indwelling tubes Heelsticks Arterial punctures Suctioning
28
Neonatal Pain Tool No Neonatal pain tool is perfect
Multidimensional pain tools that look at more than one sign of pain [cry, behavior, vital sign changes, etc] are preferred over unidimensional tools The N-PASS [Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale] will be used for all neonates < 44 weeks post-conceptual age.. [Puchalski and Hummel, Loyola University Medical Hospital]
29
For Pain Assessment "0" = no pain behaviors
30
Sedation Score "0" = no signs of sedation
31
Pain Interventions Should be initiated for scores of > 3
Some older infants may have an increased baseline score, interventions should then be instituted for consistent elevations. Those weaning from opioids may have increased scores
32
N-PASS Idiosyncrasies
Premies are given up to 3 additional points based on their gestation Pain and sedation scores are scored separately
33
Goals of pain treatment
The score should be < 3 usually Show a decrease in the pain score
34
Sedation Score Scored to assess response to stimuli
Though sedation need not be scored with every VS, Sedation should be scored: With hands-on VS When patients are on analgesics or sedatives When stimulation of the baby is necessary, e.g heelsticks, suctioning, position changes Baby should not be stimulated unnecessarily to assess the sedation score
35
N-PASS Sedation Score- Utility
When sedation of the infant is a goal When sedation--or over-sedation-- is a side effect of analgesia or sedative administration
36
Levels of Sedation Noted on N-PASS as negative scores
Desired levels vary based on treatment goals Deep sedation [avoided unless patient is on mechanical ventilation] = -10 to - 5 Light sedation = -5 to –2
37
Negative sedation score interpretation
Sedation has been achieved or is a by product of medication administration May also indicate neurological depression, sepsis, or other pathology May indicate a pain response in a premie who is “shut down” in the face of prolonged or unrelieved pain or stress.
38
Continuous reassessment
Reassessment is key to successful pain management Should occur on a routine basis after an initial report of pain & after each intervention to document the effectiveness of the intervention. Guides the continued care plan Adjust p.m. regime to clinical reassessment findings & understanding of pharmacology, non-pharm rx, & the individual patient.
39
Customization, collaboration
Use a multimodal approach with regard to pharmacologic agents-peripheral & central relief Non-pharmacologic: heat/cold;relaxa-tion techniques;dis-traction
40
Policies & Procedures COP 8, Assessment & Management of Pain in Infants, Children & Young Adults
41
Pain management is a patient right
Nurses must make a conscious commitment to support this right “It’ s good thing!”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.