1. NIPEC Development Framework Project (2003 to 2006) Evaluation Report

2. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Contents of Presentation: 1. Project Management Structures 2. Project Management Progress 3. Delivery of Milestones from the Project Plan 4. Evidence of Rigor within the Project 5. Partnership Development 6. Risk Management

3. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Project Management Structures Sub Group Sub Group Sub Group Sub Group Sub Group Project Team Project Group Project Board NIPEC Council

4. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Project Management Progress Attendance of Project Group & Project Board Observation of meetings Monitoring of Project managers reports against GNATT chart Monitoring of all Project Board and Project Group minutes and agreed actions

5. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Project Group Attendance

6. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Project Board Attendance

7. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Delivery of Milestones from the Project Plan A GNATT chart used & updated on a regular basis Main milestone targets identified were met One Exception Overall reflection on the Project Delivery: A Major Achievement for a Project of this size and complexity to be carried out within the timescale identified.

8. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Evidence of Rigor within the Project Project established within a strong project management structure Project ideas, papers & outputs shared, discussed and analysed by stakeholders

9. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Partnership Development Wide membership of the Groups and Subgroups Use of NIPEC’s ‘Nurse Links Network’ database Membership of the Project Board drawn from a wide background both within the HPSS Trusts & Boards but also the Voluntary and Independent sector organisations.

10. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report Risk Management Risk Register maintained for the Project Adequate project controls were in place Appropriate files and records were maintained for the Project Overall direction and integrity of the project was always maintained Appropriate revenue funding was secured and in place when required for each stage of the project

11. Presentation to ‘df’ Project Board 22nd March, 2006. Evaluation Report