Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NCRLab Free-Space Optical (FSO) Communications Employing Binary Polarization Shift Keying (2PolSK) Coherent Modulation in Atmospheric Turbulence Channel.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NCRLab Free-Space Optical (FSO) Communications Employing Binary Polarization Shift Keying (2PolSK) Coherent Modulation in Atmospheric Turbulence Channel."— Presentation transcript:

1 NCRLab Free-Space Optical (FSO) Communications Employing Binary Polarization Shift Keying (2PolSK) Coherent Modulation in Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Xuan Tang1, Prof. Z. Ghassemlooy1 and Dr. C. G. Lee2 1: Optical Communications Research Group, NCRLab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 2: Department of Electronic Engineering, Chosun University, S. Korea

2 NCRLab FSO Challenging The laser beam propagating through the FSO channel suffers from the atmospheric turbulence induced fading [1]; Turbulence leads to random fluctuations in the direction, intensity and phase of the laser beam carrying the information [2]; It has been experimentally verified that polarization is less sensitive to the turbulence fluctuation experienced by the laser beam propagating through the channel [3]. 6.5 dB/km 150 dB/km 225 dB/km Iniguez, R.R., Idrus, S.M., and Sun, Z.: 'Atmospheric transmission limitations, in Optical Wireless Communications - IR for Wireless Connectivity', 2008, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, London, pp. 25 – 42 Pratt, W.K.: 'Atmospheric propagation', in Ballard, S.S. (Ed.): 'Laser communication systems' (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,1969,), pp Saleh, A.A.M.: 'An investigation of laser wave depolarization due to atmospheric transmission', IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, June , (6), pp. 256

3 Why choose PolSK? NCRLab AM Disadvantages
Requires adaptive thresholding scheme to perform optimally in the presence of turbulence [1]; PM Disadvantages Highly sensitive to the phase noise; Requires a complex synchronization [2]; FM Disadvantages Bandwidth inefficient; Inferior BER performance compared to PM in the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel [3]; Alternative solution ─ PolSK High immunity to the laser phase noise [3]; Maintains SOPs over a long propagation link [4]; Doesn’t suffer from excess frequency chirp generated by the all-optical processing devices [3]; Attractive for the peak power limited systems because it’s a constant envelope modulation [4]. Popoola, W.O. and Ghassemlooy Z.: 'BPSK subcarrier intensity modulated free-space optical communications in atmospheric turbulence', Journal of Lightwave Technology, 15 April 2009, 27, (8), pp. 967 – 973 Betti, S., Marchis G.D., and Iannone E.: 'Coherent systems: structure and ideal performance', in Chang K. (Ed.): 'Coherent optical communications systems' (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995), pp. 242 – 313 Chi, N., et al.: 'Generation and transmission performance of 40 Gbit/s polarisation shift keying signal', Electronics Letters, 28 April 2005, 41, (9), pp Zhao, X.: 'Circle polarization shift keying with direct detection for free-space optical communication', Optical Communications and Networking September 2009, 1, (4), pp

4 (No Spatial Diversity)
NCRLab 2PolSK System (No Spatial Diversity) Data Symbol ‘1’ Symbol ‘0’ LD PC PS PM Atmospheric Channel x y Vb Va Vmatch (DC ONLY) LO LPF Elo(t) Er(t) PD BPF Sampler V(t) Pr,lo : signal power ωr.lo: angular frequencies Фr,lo : phase noises m(t): the binary information LD, laser diode; PC, polarization controller; PS, polarizing beam splitter; LO, local oscillator; PD, photo detector; BPF, bandpass filter; LPF, lowpass filter.

5 2PolSK with Spatial Diversity
NCRLab 2PolSK with Spatial Diversity a1 Elo(t) Er1(t) Ex1(t) Ey1(t) Sampler a2 Er2(t) Ex2(t) Ey2(t) an Ern(t) Exn(t) Eyn(t) Combiner Equal Gain Combining Maximum Ratio Combining

6 Results and Discussion
NCRLab Results and Discussion 3.9 dB 0.92 dB 8.94 dB 5.94 dB Worst achievement Best achievement 3 dB No Spatial Diversity ̶̶̶ ̶̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶̶̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ Weak Regime EGC ̶ ̶̶̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ Moderate Regime MRC ̶ ̶ ̶̶̶ ̶ ̶ Strong Regime BER performances against the SNR for 2PolSK with single detector and spatial diversity N = 2 for weak, moderate and strong turbulence regimes.

7 Results and Discussion ─ contd.
NCRLab Results and Discussion ─ contd. 10.77 dB 2.37 dB 11.55 dB 2.64 dB 2.11 dB 0.74 dB The SNR requirement to achieve a BER of 10-6 against the number of photodetectors N with MRC for weak, moderate and strong turbulence regimes at a BER of 10-6.

8 NCRLab Conclusion A novel 2PolSK system employing a spatial diversity with N -photodetector is proposed to circumvent the scintillation effect on a FSO link. My contributions in this work include: No need for synchronization at the receiver since the optical reference signal is transmitted at a different state of polarization; No error floor and no power penalty in the BER performance due to the intermediate angular frequency (IF) and the IF phase noise are eliminated by employing polarization modulation; Higher transmission data rates can be achieved by employing the external modulation.


Download ppt "NCRLab Free-Space Optical (FSO) Communications Employing Binary Polarization Shift Keying (2PolSK) Coherent Modulation in Atmospheric Turbulence Channel."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google