Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMeadow Capes Modified over 10 years ago
1
In Vivo Architectural Properties of the Gastrocnemius Muscle in Cerebral Palsy Amir A Mohagheghi, PhD Institute for Biophysical & Clinical Research into Human Movement, MMU Cheshire, Alsager
2
Conventional Treatment Methods Medical: Toxin injection Serial casting Surgery Rehabilitation: Positioning Stretching FES
3
Why examine MTU adaptation to the physiological stimuli? Muscles are adaptive tissues: Response to the volume of exercise Response to stretch/tenotomy Muscle-Tendon Unit is the mean by which treatment is applied Muscle-Tendon Unit is affected by the applied Treatment
4
What to examine and at what level? Structure and Mechanical Behaviour in vitro Muscle Fibre (length, size, type, stiffness) Architectural Parameters in vivo Muscle (muscle, tendon, and MTU length) Muscle Fascicles (fascicle length, pennation angle)
5
Muscle Architectural Parameters
6
CP Muscle Fibre Structural & Behavioural Properties Short Small (greater variability in size) Stiff Predominantly Type I
7
In Vivo CP Muscle Architectural Properties Normal Fascicle Length (scaled to the leg length) Shorter MTU Length (SIMM modelling) Smaller Pennation Angle
8
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Aim: determination of the medial gastrocnemius muscle (GM) architectural properties in vivo determination of the medial gastrocnemius muscle (GM) architectural properties in vivo Hypotheses: MTU length will be shorter in the CP MTU length will be shorter in the CP Normal fascicle length Normal fascicle length Smaller pennation angle Smaller pennation angle
9
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Apparatus: A linear array ALOKA ultrasound system (10.5 MHz; B-mode real-time) A linear array ALOKA ultrasound system (10.5 MHz; B-mode real-time) Participants (6 M:1 F): CP group: 7 ambulatory Hemiplegic participants (10.7 ± 5.1 years) CP group: 7 ambulatory Hemiplegic participants (10.7 ± 5.1 years) Healthy group: 7 participant (11.0 ± 3.7 years) Healthy group: 7 participant (11.0 ± 3.7 years)
10
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Procedure: Prone position Prone position No correction of the posture No correction of the posture Hand goniometry of the ankle joint Hand goniometry of the ankle joint Leg length Leg length Determination of the knee joint line, MTJ, Achilles tendon insertion point: Determination of the knee joint line, MTJ, Achilles tendon insertion point: Muscle length Muscle length Tendon length Tendon length
11
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Procedure: Sagittal scanning of the GM ImageJ software ImageJ software Statistical Analysis: Paired t-test for within-groups comparisons Paired t-test for within-groups comparisons Un-paired t-test for between-groups comparisons Un-paired t-test for between-groups comparisons α =.05 α =.05
12
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Results (between-groups comparisons): Similar resting ankle joint angle (32) Similar resting ankle joint angle (32) Muscles were 11% shorter in CP Muscles were 11% shorter in CP Tendons were 8% longer in CP Tendons were 8% longer in CP muscle and tendon length differences disappeared when muscle and tendon lengths were scaled to the leg length muscle and tendon length differences disappeared when muscle and tendon lengths were scaled to the leg length
13
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Results (between-groups comparisons): Fascicles were 25% shorter in CP Fascicles were 25% shorter in CP Fascicle length difference disappeared when scaled to the leg length Fascicle length difference disappeared when scaled to the leg length Similar Pennation angles: Similar Pennation angles: SPA: 14.5 ± 1.9 vs 14.5 ± 4.4 (CP) DPA: 17.8 ± 1.6 vs 18.3 ± 4.6 (CP)
14
MMU Cheshire CP Project - CEREBRA Discussion: Similarity of the architectural parameters at rest should not be generalised to the dynamic conditions: Tonic Stretch Reflex Mechanical behaviour of the spastic fibres Mechanisms (neural and/or muscular) that control muscle length at rest are not altered in CP.
15
THANK YOU
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.