Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJackeline Tarrant Modified over 10 years ago
1
key ideas and lessons learned Peter Bardsley auctions: theory, evidence, policy
2
our objective our objective was to illustrate some basic effects that are basic to all auction design problems bidder behaviour is influenced by auction design and the auction environment auction performance (revenue) is influenced by auction design and the auction environment the link between the two is more subtle than you might expect
3
behaviour auction design, and the auction environment, affect bidder behaviour bidders bid more aggressively –if there are more bidders –in a second price auction than in a first price auction the second price auction is strategically equivalent to the English auction the effect of second order effects like risk aversion is more subtle we expect risk aversion to push up bids in an English auction but not in a closed bid auction there are other effects, that we have not discussed, that can affect the English auction that’s theory. It’s prudent to check how it actually works out in the lab.
4
value bid 1 st price, Dutch bid curves – different formats n bidders 2 nd price, English
5
value bid bid curves – more bidders N bidders 2 nd price, English 1 st price, Dutch
6
revenue - 1 changing the auction format from 1 st to 2 nd price (or Dutch to English) leads to more aggressive bidding but to a first approximation, revenue does not change
7
value bid 1 st price
8
value bid 1 st price 2 nd price
9
value bid 1 st price 2 nd price
10
value bid 1 st price 2 nd price revenue equivalence
11
revenue - 2 increasing the number of bidders always increases revenue we illustrate with a 1 st price auction –2 nd price is similar
12
value bid 1 st price bid curve n bidders
13
value bid 1 st price more bidders – expected highest value goes up N bidders
14
value bid 1 st price more bidders – bidders bid more aggressively N bidders
15
what we have not covered auction theory is complicated. Here are some of the things we have not covered: –common value environments and the winner’s curse –selling or buying multiple objects either identical or combinatorial –reserve prices, entry fees,... –asymmetric bidders –collusion –the interplay between auction theory, contract theory, and negotiation it is not because we have nothing to say on these subjects –in fact we know a great deal about all of them the basic principles that we have introduced apply in these more complex environments –but there are new subtleties, new complexities
16
the bottom line intuition can be misleading theory can be misleading experiments without theory are blind improvisation without either is, well, courageous there are enormous gains to be had from good institutional design –let’s do it properly
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.