Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJesus Mayne Modified over 10 years ago
1
1 Total power is 50 kW of which 50% are dissipated in cables ATLAS SCT powering issues SLHC tracker will require even more channels and thus more cables, more cooling and more material Material in radiation length is dominated by power supply and cooling services Innovative powering system design is needed Nearly 2000 more cables needed in the final assembly ATLAS SCT Barrel 3 at CERN (192 cables visible)Material in radiation length
2
2 Conventional scheme: Independent Powering P c = nI m 2 R c * P M = n I m V m N modules are powered by N modules are powered independently by N constant voltage power supplies N constant voltage power supplies ImIm ImIm ImIm For SCT: R = 3.5 Ω, V = 4 V, I = 1.3 A => x ≈ 1.14 For ATLAS SCT: R = 3.5 Ω, V = 4 V, I = 1.3 A => x ≈ 1.14 Power efficiency 50% Power efficiency η ≈ 50% Define efficiency η = P M /(P M + P c ) η = 1/(1 + I M R C /V M ) = 1/(1+x) x = I M R C /V m = voltage drop in cable/ module voltage η decreases with increasing I M and R C and with decreasing V m
3
3 Proposed scheme: Serial Powering I Supply Module 1 Module 2 Module n Power cable ImIm ImIm P c = I m 2 Rc * P M = nI m V m N modules are powered in series by one current source; N modules are powered in series by one constant current source; local regulators provide supply voltage to the modules η = 1/(1 + IR/nV) = 1/(1+x/n) Efficiency increases if number of modules n increases Concept never practically implemented For SCT: R = 3.5 Ω, V = 4 V, I = 1.3 A N = 10 => x ≈ 1.14 For ATLAS SCT: R = 3.5 Ω, V = 4 V, I = 1.3 A N = 10 => x ≈ 1.14 Power efficiency 90% Power efficiency η ≈ 90%
4
4 Advantages of serial powering Much less power cables Much less material (less cables, less cooling) Improved power efficiency Significant cost savings
5
5 Much less cables for a detector with N modules with local regulators, the number of cables is reduced by a factor of up to 2N (analogue and digital power no longer separated) Reduction of detector material in the tracking volume: less multiple scattering and creation of secondary particles, leading to improved track finding efficiency and resolution Cable volume reduction is mandatory for an SLHC tracker, where increased luminosity would require an increased detectors granularity by a factor of 5 to 10. It is even challenging to squeeze the current number of cables in the available space Module 1 Module 2 Module n
6
6 Improved power efficiency Overall efficiency increases with increasing number of modules N Reduction of load to cooling system by tens of kW inside the tracker volume are possible X = 1.14 X = 4.5 Efficiency of serial powering normalized to independent powering vs. number of modules n for various x factors *SCT* *SLHC* Future readout chips require reduced operation voltage (due to reduced feature size) x increases Independent powering η ≈ 18% Serial powering (n = 10) η ≈ 69% Serial powering (n = 20) η ≈ 81% For a future SLHC detector x ≈ 4.5:
7
7 Reduced number of cables and remote power supplies results in major cost savings; electricity bill is reduced as well. Take ATLAS SCT as an example: 4088 power supply modules cost ≈ 1.5 MCHF; Cabling cost ≈ 2 MCHF For an SLHC tracker with independent powering, the power supplies and cables would cost tens of MCHF; a serial powering approach would reduce this by a large factor, implying a saving of many MCHF Cost savings
8
8 Miles stones of serial powering R&D Noise occupancy with 1 fC discriminator threshold for standard (left) and serial (right) power scheme. No added noise introduced by the alternative scheme is seen. Tests with ATLAS SCT modules (well advanced and promising) Grounding and interference issues in a realistic densely-packed detector system (first implementation and test in July 2006) Development of a redundancy and failure protection scheme Serial Powering circuitry integration into ABC_Next chip
9
9 Step 1: Test with ATLAS SCT modules Noise occupancy with 1 fC discriminator threshold for standard (left) and serial (right) power scheme. No added noise introduced by the alternative scheme is seen. Photograph of test setup with 4 ATLAS SCT modules, serial powering scheme implemented on PCB. Current source SCT4 SP4 SCT3 SCT2 SCT1 SP3 SP2 SP1 Noise performance with 4 SCT modules in series are very satisfactory. See talk M. Weber at LECC 2006. Have meanwhile rebuilt and streamlined hardware. Tests with 6 SCT modules will start in June 2006 Detailed set of reference measurements with up to 6 modules Measure power saving and compare with predicted values Noise spectrum study: introduce high frequency noise Deadtime-less operation
10
10 Step 2: Grounding and interference in a densely- packed detector system Tests with independent modules are sensitive to “pick-up” through the serial power line (conductive interference) In an integrated detector arrangement, there are additional pick-up mechanisms e.g. capacitive and inductive interference between nearby components (bus cable/hybrids/sensors) This will be investigated, understood and eliminated using a CDF Run IIb type stave built by Carl Haber at LBNL (first tests are scheduled for July 2006) This stave is a most compact package and thus the ultimate test bed Its electrical performance and interference mechanisms are well- understood and documented M. Weber et. al., NIM A556 (2006) 459-481 and R. Ely, M. Weber et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci NS-52 (5) (2005) in press. CDF Run IIb stave
11
11 Step 4: Serial Powering circuitry integration Stave noise tests will be performed with bare-die commercial regulators Final implementation requires radiation-hard ASICs Noise and redundancy studies will, however, lead to regulator specifications for a dedicated ASIC or a silicon strip readout chip (RDIC) output impedance of regulators, max. current PSRR of RDIC current sensing features of RDIC/regulators controlled short voltage adjustment features Design of an RDIC with serial powering features is discussed with CERN MIC group in the context of the proposed ABC-Next chip, a 0.25 μ m CMOS RDIC
12
12 Appendix - connection diagram - The maximum voltage difference depends on the voltage required by each module. The latter is expected to be of the order of 1.2 – 2.5V maximum Serial Powering reduces the number of power cables by up to 2n, instead of n, when analogue module power is obtained from digital power. The final number of modules n will depend on several factors e.g. maximum allowed voltage, failure probability, readout architecture and mechanical considerations. The rapidly shrinking feature size in microelectronics, implies a decrease in x; We thus expect the number of modules powered in series to be higher than 10.
13
13 Appendix - TX/RX diagram - Figure A1: Simplified TX/RX connection diagram. The connections are differential. Termination and feed-back resistors are omitted for clarity. Modules are referenced to different “ground” levels than DAQ Modules have to send data signals to DAQ and receive clock and command signals from DAQ This is achieved by AC- coupling of LVDS signals
14
14 Figure A5: Consumption in power cables Appendix - Power consumption in power cables- one-way cable length from power supply to detector: up to 160 m cable resistance (including return): 3.5 Ω; ~1.5 Ω in active volume cable resistance (including return): 3.5 Ω; ~1.5 Ω in active volume
15
15 Appendix - Material overhead - Figure A7: Material in radiation length DiscsBarrel Interaction point CablesService gap Figure A6: Generic tracker layout with barrel and discs in ATLAS SCT, particles cross (0.1 to 0.45%) x √2 of R.L. of cables in service gap alone (dep. on polar angle) in ATLAS SCT, particles cross (0.1 to 0.45%) x √2 of R.L. of cables in service gap alone (dep. on polar angle) a ten-fold increase of cables is prohibitive Reduction of detector material in the tracking volume: less multiple scattering and creation of secondary particles, leading to improved tracking efficiency and resolution Reduction of detector material in the tracking volume: less multiple scattering and creation of secondary particles, leading to improved tracking efficiency and resolution
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.