3. B&Q – small steps over time – driven by the label. 10% of world’s productive forests FSC’ed - Marks and Spencer - Wyevale Garden Centres 1993 1997 1995 2000 WWF Buyers’ Group

6. One solution inspires others:

10. “ACCPE Toolbox” Success stories – issue specific, bespoke for product

11. Different tools over time to drive change Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s

12. Richmond Parking fees Road tax banding £25 congestion charge Different tools over time Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s

15. 15% - brewing 4% - malting 81% - Manufacture packaging (Distribution?) 0.2% - crop production BUT - Foot-printing is vital to drive the right decisions…

20. The Stuff Debate If everyone in the world used the same amount of stuff as we do in UK … Finite limits of everything!

21. FSC was about Finite Limits

22. FISS – Sustainable Food = balance between:

23. Does this help…

25. Business and public policy drives change – not the consumer….

26. Different labels are different for a reason

27. Richmond Parking fees Road tax banding £25 congestion charge Different tools over time Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s

28. Product Roadmaps (clothes, cars, lighting… 10x) DEFRA Leading the way Label Choice editing Standards Product Roadmaps

30. Food preparation?

31. Product use…

32. “ Boil what you need” “Boil what you need…”

33. “ Boil what you need” “Boil what you need…”

34. Not just energy related…

35. What about use? Co2 labelled peat is coming! Carbon to dig and move peat to store – included Carbon from decay of peat – not included Decay = x4 more Co2

36. Labelling – should not be a distraction for better solutions

38. And everyone’s going green Nuclear?

39. Do offsets and labels fit together?

43. “Law of unintended consequences”