1. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0346r1 Submission March 2008 Marc Emmelmann, TU BerlinSlide 1 Addressing LB 101 action items 81, 82, and 21 Date: 2008-03-17 Authors:

2. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0346r1 Submission March 2008 Marc Emmelmann, TU BerlinSlide 2 Abstract The document addresses LB 101 action items 81, 82, and 21.

3. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0346r1 Submission March 2008 Marc Emmelmann, TU BerlinSlide 3 Action Items 81 & 82 (CIDs 960 & 879) Comments were accepted during telephone conference. Proposed resolutions states “On the intro add ‘to allow the DUT to the choose the rate and compare with fixed PHY rate.’ ” Action items state to propose such a text. Motion –Move to add the following text after the first sentence of 6.4.1 (page 49 line 52 of 802.11.2 D1.0) “The intention of this test is to compare the throughput achieved by transmit rate adaptation versus the throughput achieved by fixing the transmit Phy bit rate.” –Moved: Marc Emmelmann –Seconded: –Y/N/A:

4. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0346r1 Submission March 2008 Marc Emmelmann, TU BerlinSlide 4 Action Item 21 (CIDs 237 & 932) Action Item: CIDs 237 and 932 - definition of CWmin (D.2.3) not aligned with the usage of CWmin. Need new definition. Current Draft Text (D1.0): “D.2.3 CWmin: Best-case (theoretical) contention window time measured in slots.” Motion: –Replace the definition D.2.3 with the following text: “Smallest possible value for the upper bound of the interval [0,contention window] used for the calculation for the random backoff time.” –Moved: Marc Emmelmann –Seconded: –Y/N/A: