1. June 2009 A Review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework: Planning for Recovery Emergency Management Institute Higher Education Conference Gavin Smith, Ph.D., AICP University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Emergency Management Institute Higher Education Conference Gavin Smith, Ph.D., AICP University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

2. U.S. Disaster Assistance Framework and Recovery Outcomes: Planning for Pre and Post-Disaster Recovery?

3. The Disaster Recovery Literature and Practice  Least Understood Aspect of Emergency Management (scholars and practitioners)  Who is Responsible for Recovery?  The Planner Emergency Management Divide  Public Sector  Others  Disaster Recovery Dominated by the Post-Event Administration of Federal Programs  Pre-event Planning for Post-Disaster Disaster Recovery Remains Marginalized  A Review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework: Planning for Recovery.  Public Entity Risk Institute  Application of Professional Experience and Advancing the Recovery Literature  Least Understood Aspect of Emergency Management (scholars and practitioners)  Who is Responsible for Recovery?  The Planner Emergency Management Divide  Public Sector  Others  Disaster Recovery Dominated by the Post-Event Administration of Federal Programs  Pre-event Planning for Post-Disaster Disaster Recovery Remains Marginalized  A Review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework: Planning for Recovery.  Public Entity Risk Institute  Application of Professional Experience and Advancing the Recovery Literature

4. Characteristics of the U.S. Disaster Assistance Framework  Disaster Assistance: Funding, Policy and Technical Assistance  Disaster Assistance Network  Rules  Level of Prescriptiveness  “Zone of Uncertainty”  Understanding of Local Needs  Greatest Resources, Least Understanding of Local Needs?  Closest to Problem, Least Prepared, Fewest Resources?  Timing Within Organizations and Across Disaster Assistance Network  Speed of Aid versus Deliberative Approach (i.e. planning for recovery)  Coordinative Challenges  Horizontal and Vertical Integration  The Role of Planning – Improving the Disaster Recovery Assistance Framework  Process  Plan-Making  Disaster Assistance: Funding, Policy and Technical Assistance  Disaster Assistance Network  Rules  Level of Prescriptiveness  “Zone of Uncertainty”  Understanding of Local Needs  Greatest Resources, Least Understanding of Local Needs?  Closest to Problem, Least Prepared, Fewest Resources?  Timing Within Organizations and Across Disaster Assistance Network  Speed of Aid versus Deliberative Approach (i.e. planning for recovery)  Coordinative Challenges  Horizontal and Vertical Integration  The Role of Planning – Improving the Disaster Recovery Assistance Framework  Process  Plan-Making

6. Disaster Recovery Process (Haas, Kates and Bowden 1977)

8. Horizontal and Vertical Integration

9. Transforming the Disaster Recovery Assistance Framework

10. Recommendations  Develop and Institutionalize a Comprehensive National Recovery Strategy  Disaster Recovery Act  Enhanced Role of Pre- and Post-Disaster Recovery Planning  Role of ESF-14  Planning as Coordination of Assistance and Capacity Building  Planning Mandate  Increase Local Capacity and Commitment by Enhancing Self Reliance and Accountability  Increase Provision of Capacity Building Assistance Pre-Event  Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery  Hold Local and State Governments Accountable  Tie Compliance to Post-Disaster Assistance  Require Land Use Planning Element (key weakness in DMA)  Maximize the Use of Collaborative Problem Solving and Resource Allocation Strategies  Role of Land Use Planners: Process and Plan-Making  Modify Existing Collaborative Venues  Develop and Institutionalize a Comprehensive National Recovery Strategy  Disaster Recovery Act  Enhanced Role of Pre- and Post-Disaster Recovery Planning  Role of ESF-14  Planning as Coordination of Assistance and Capacity Building  Planning Mandate  Increase Local Capacity and Commitment by Enhancing Self Reliance and Accountability  Increase Provision of Capacity Building Assistance Pre-Event  Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery  Hold Local and State Governments Accountable  Tie Compliance to Post-Disaster Assistance  Require Land Use Planning Element (key weakness in DMA)  Maximize the Use of Collaborative Problem Solving and Resource Allocation Strategies  Role of Land Use Planners: Process and Plan-Making  Modify Existing Collaborative Venues

11. The Role of Planners in the Disaster Assistance Framework  Improved Use of Existing Planning Tools and Processes  Boundary Spanning Function  Pre-Event Planning  Land Use Planning Tools  Among the Most Effective / Underutilized in Recovery  Poor Coordination between Planners and Emergency Managers  Planning Process – Disasters as Conflict/Altruism  Dispute Resolution  Policy Dialogue  Negotiation  Facilitation  Public Participation / Participatory, Inclusive Decision Making Across Network  Connectivity to Framework – Changing the Defining Characteristics  Rules, Understanding of Local Needs, Coordination of Aid, Timing  Improved Use of Existing Planning Tools and Processes  Boundary Spanning Function  Pre-Event Planning  Land Use Planning Tools  Among the Most Effective / Underutilized in Recovery  Poor Coordination between Planners and Emergency Managers  Planning Process – Disasters as Conflict/Altruism  Dispute Resolution  Policy Dialogue  Negotiation  Facilitation  Public Participation / Participatory, Inclusive Decision Making Across Network  Connectivity to Framework – Changing the Defining Characteristics  Rules, Understanding of Local Needs, Coordination of Aid, Timing

12. Modify Existing Collaborative Venues  National Response Framework  ESF-14  NVOAD  EMAC  EMAP  Project Impact  Contractor On-Call Contracts  International Aid  National Response Framework  ESF-14  NVOAD  EMAC  EMAP  Project Impact  Contractor On-Call Contracts  International Aid