Download presentation
1
FIG_18.jpg
2
Atterberg Limits of Bay Mud
FIG_18A.jpg
3
Variation of Index Properties with Depth Muni Metro Turnback Site (Embarcadero Waterfront)
FIG_19.jpg
4
Index Properties of Bay Mud Islais Creek Area Marshlands (Contract C Alignment)
FIG_20.jpg
5
Index Properties of Bay Mud Islais Creek Channel Area (Digesters Project)
FIG_21.jpg
6
Index Properties of Bay Mud DTX Segment Along Townsend Street (Mission Bay Area)
FIG_22.jpg
7
Normalized Undrained Strength Behavior of Bay Mud DSS Tests
FIG_23.jpg
8
Variation of Normalized Strength Ratios with Overconsolidation Ratio
FIG_24.jpg
9
SHANSEP Principles of Normalized Undrained Strength Behavior
FIG_25.jpg
10
Anisotropic Behavior of Soft Clays
FIG_26.jpg
11
Normalized Strength-Strain Behavior from Undrained Ko-Triaxial Compression Tests
FIG_27.jpg
12
Pore Pressure Behavior from Ko-Triaxial Compression Tests: NC Soil
FIG_28.jpg
13
Excess Pore Pressures from Ko-Triaxial Compression Tests: OC Soil
FIG_28A.jpg
14
Effective Stress Paths from Ko-Triaxial Compression Tests
FIG_29.jpg
15
Anisotropy and Strain Compatibility Considerations
FIG_30.jpg
16
Correlation of Normalized Strength Ratios from DSS and Vane Shear Tests
FIG_31.jpg
17
SHANSEP Principles of Normalized Undrained Strength Behavior
FIG_32.jpg
18
Undrained Shear Strengths from Vane Shear Tests Islais Creek T/S Project (Contract D)
FIG_33.jpg
19
Stress History and Vane Shear Strengths Muni Metro Turnback Site
FIG_34.jpg
20
Undrained Shear Strengths from Vane Shear Tests DTX Alignment Along Townsend Street
FIG_35.jpg
21
Undrained Shear Strengths from Vane Shear Tests Islais Creek Area Along Davidson Street
FIG_36.jpg
22
Stress History and Undrained Strengths from Vane Shear Islais Creek (Contract C)
FIG_37.jpg
23
Vane Shear Strengths and Excavation Deformations Rankin Pump Station Site: Islais Creek Estuary
FIG_37A.jpg
24
Undrained Shear Strengths from Vane Shear and Torvane Tests Hamilton Field, Deep Mud Area
FIG_38.jpg
25
Undrained Shear Strength of a Site Undergoing Consolidation Under “Recent” Reclamation Fill
FIG_39.jpg
26
Stress History and Undrained Vane Shear Strengths of Organic Bay Mud at a Recently Reclaimed Site
FIG_40.jpg
27
Variations in Undrained Shear Strengths Between Offshore and Onshore Sites
FIG_41.jpg
28
Field Vane Tests Inner Marshlands of Islais Creek Shallow Mud (Contract C Site)
FIG_42.jpg
29
Comparison of Field Vane Shear Strength with Geotechnical Report Recommendations
FIG_43.jpg
30
Vane Shear Strength Inner Marshlands at Islais Creek – Contract C Near McKinnon Street (Deeper Mud)
FIG_44.jpg
31
Typical Results of CPT Tests in Bay Mud
FIG_45.jpg
32
Correlation of Undrained Strengths from CPT and Vane Shear Tests Hamilton Field Site
FIG_46.jpg
33
Correlation of Undrained Strengths from CPT and Vane Shear Tests Mission Bay Site Along Townsend Street FIG_47.jpg
34
Estimation of Maximum Past Pressures from Vane Shear Tests Hamilton Field Site
FIG_48.jpg
35
Maximum Past Pressures Estimated from Vane Shear Tests Mission Bay Along Townsend Street
FIG_49.jpg
36
Estimation of Maximum Past Pressures from Vane Shear Tests Hamilton Field Site: Shallow Mud Area Under Existing Levees FIG_50.jpg
37
Estimation of Maximum Past Pressures from Vane Shear Tests Shallow Mud – Free Field Area (HW)
FIG_51.jpg
38
Estimation of Maximum Past Pressures from Vane Shear Tests Muni Metro East Site
FIG_52.jpg
39
Undrained Shear Strenghts from Vane Shear Tests Muni Metro East Side
FIG_52A.jpg
40
Estimation of Maximum Past Pressures from Vane Shear Tests Transbay Terminal Site
FIG_53.jpg
41
Comparison of Undrained Shear Strengths from Vane Shear and UU Tests Muni Metro Turnback Site
FIG_54.jpg
42
Title FIG_54A.jpg
43
Undrained Strengths from Vane Shear, UU, and Torvane Tests Digesters Site – Islais Creek Estuary
FIG_55.jpg
44
Normalized Undrained Modulus from DSS Tests Normally Consolidated Bay Mud
FIG_56.jpg
45
Normalized Undrained Modulus from DSS Tests Normally and Overconsolidated Bay Mud
FIG_57.jpg
46
Variation of Normalized Modulus with Strain Level Ko-Triaxial Compression Tests
FIG_58.jpg
47
Variation of Compression Ratio with Moisture Content: Bay Mud and Stiff Clays at Hamilton Field Site
FIG_59.jpg
48
Variation of Compression Ratio with Moisture Content North Bay Site
FIG_60.jpg
49
Variation of Recompression Ratio with Moisture Content
FIG_61.jpg
50
Variation of Coefficients of Vertical Consolidation with Liquid Limit
FIG_62.jpg
51
Variation of Hydraulic Conductivity with Void Ratio
FIG_62A.jpg
52
Coefficient of Vertical Consolidation of Organic Bay Mud
FIG_63.jpg
53
Post-Construction Settlements at a Preloaded Site North Bay Site
FIG_64.jpg
54
Asaoka Method for Estimation of Coefficients of Consolidation and End of Primary Consolidation
FIG_65.jpg
55
Estimates of Coefficients of Horizontal Consolidation Using the Asaoka Method (Jamialkowski, et al., 1995) FIG_66.jpg
56
Variation of Ch with Drain Spacing
FIG_67.jpg
57
Variation of Coefficients of Secondary Consolidation with Consolidation Stress
FIG_68.jpg
58
Variation of Coefficient of Secondary Consolidation with Moisture Content
FIG_69.jpg
59
Variation of Ca with Moisture Content
FIG_70.jpg
60
Long-Term Settlements at Mission and Howard Streets
FIG_71.jpg
61
Extrapolation of Settlement Data at Mission Street Secondary Compression
FIG_72.jpg
62
Estimation of Coefficients of Secondary Consolidation from Long-Term Settlement Data
FIG_73.jpg
63
Estimation of Coefficients of Secondary Consolidation from Settlement Data
FIG_74.jpg
64
Effects of Surcharge on Secondary Compression (Ladd, 1989)
FIG_75.jpg
65
Reduction of Coefficient of Secondary Consolidation Due to Surcharge (Ladd, 1989)
FIG_76.jpg
66
Shear Wave Velocities of Bay Mud
FIG_77.jpg
67
Tentative Correlation of Shear Wave Velocity with Undrained Shear Strength of Bay Mud
FIG_78.jpg
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.