1. Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San Buenaventura Public Works Department Engineering and Operations Division January 25, 2010 RTPA RCTF

2. The Need for a Statewide Study California’s local streets and road system reaching a point of crisis Every trip begins and ends at City and County Streets Whether by bike, bus, rail, truck, or family car, Californians need the local system. This report provides critical analysis on the local network condition and funding needs

3. Study Objectives What are conditions of local streets & roads? How much will it cost to improve/maintain pavements in an acceptable condition? What are safety, traffic & regulatory needs? Is there a funding shortfall? If so, what is it?

4. Local Streets & Roads are Huge Part of State Network 81% of California’s pavements are owned by cities and counties!

5. It’s Not Just Pavements … Sidewalks ADA ramps Curb & gutter Storm drains Lighting

6. Study Assumptions 10 year analysis period Constant 2008 $ Pavement goal is best management practices Inclusion of safety, traffic & regulatory elements Does not include new streets or capital improvements.

7. Data Collection Total of 406 agencies –56 counties –350 cities Missing 130 agencies –Mostly small cities –No data –No resources 71% data rec’d 29% no data Data received 93% of centerline miles No Data 7% of centerline miles

8. Quality Assurance Validation checks –Lengths – compared with HPMS –Areas – simple checks –Math errors –Mismatched units –Tests of reasonableness Made follow-up calls/emails – only medium/large agencies

9. How Good Are Pavement Data?

10. Quality of Safety, Traffic & Regulatory / $$ Data Safety, traffic & regulatory –188 partial, 58 complete Funding/expenditures –29 counties & 108 cities responded

11. Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study Current Statewide Pavement Condition is 68, but will decline to 48 in 25 years Requires $5 Billion PER YEAR over next 10 years to bring pavement only up to “good condition” Requires $1.8 Billion/year to maintain pavement afterwards Requires add’l $2 Billion/year to bring non- pavement components to good condition.

12. Quick Facts from California Statewide Needs Assessment Study (cont.) Sponsored by: –California State Association of Counties –League of California Cities –County Engineers Association of California –County of Los Angeles –California Regional Transportation Planning Agencies –California Rural Counties Task Force

13. PCI Rating Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Failed 100 85 70 55 40 25 10 0 Pavement Condition Index (PCI)

14. City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets 39 % of Our Roads are in this condition

15. 48 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

16. 9 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

17. 3 % of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

18. <1% of Our Roads are in this condition City of Ventura – Public Works Engineering & Operations - Streets

19. Statewide Average PCI = 68

20. Why is 68 Critical? 68 $2/sy $15-40/sy $40-70/sy $60-100/sy

24. Statewide Funding Sources Funding Sources Annual Funding FY 2006/07 & 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 onward State41.0%40.5%52.9% State - Prop 1B10.0%0% Federal with ARRA*10.8%35.9%10.4% Local38.1%23.6%36.8% * ARRA local share is assumed to be 40% of $1.6 billion.

25. Critical Revenue Streams Proposition 42: Cities and Counties will receive approximately $592 million in FY 2009-10. –City of Ventura received $800,000 in 2009 –Primarily Used for Slurry Seal Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA/Gas Tax): Cities and Counties will receive $986 million in FY 2009-10. –City of Ventura receives $2.2 million –Most flexible source of revenue used for operations and maintenance and rehabilitation of local roads.

26. Transportation Funds in Jeopardy in FY 2010-11 The State deferred the first two quarters of Proposition 42 funds to cities and counties in FY 2009-10. The State also deferred seven months of gas tax subventions to cities and counties in FY 2009-10. The Legislative Analysts’ Office projects another approximately $20 billion budget deficit over the next 18 months alone. Transportation revenues continue to be in jeopardy.

27. What Happens If We Don’t Get More Funding State-wide? 68 (at risk) 48 (poor) 20082033 PCI Backlog ($ billion) $37B $79B

28. Total 10 Year Shortfall ($B) Transportation Asset 10 Year Needs Existing Funding 10 Year Shortfall Pavements$ 67.6 $ 15.9 $ 51.7 Essential Components $ 32.1 $ 12.4 $ 19.7 Total shortfall $71.4 38 cents/gal 38 cents/gallon!

29. Funding Shortfall for City of Ventura City of Ventura has a funding shortfall of $95 million for the next ten years. City of Ventura has a backlog of $74 million.

30. Summary Good News –Data received represents 93% of local system –Statewide average PCI = 68 –Gas is $3.00/gallon today Not so good news –PCI = 68 is at risk category & drops to 48 by 2033 with existing funding –Need to more than double existing funding to maintain transportation assets

43. Questions?