Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMariah Blankenship Modified over 10 years ago
1
email: konradd@politech-institute.eu Brussels, Belgium November 16, 2010 by Konrad Dwojak Junior Project Coordinator POLITECH INSTITUTE ePractice Workshop: Public Services 2.0 WAVE & eMPOWER: eParticipation Case Studies for Public Services 2.0 POLITECH INSTITUTE European Center of Political Technologies
2
What is WAVE? WAVE - Welcoming Argument Visualization to Europe Targets cross-border discussions on drafted and implemented EU environmental legislation on climate change feedbacks its results to MEPs and MPs affiliated with the Project to ultimately join up with and inform the national governments of the three trial sites - UK, France and Lithuania Bottom-up approach 6576 users www.wave-project.eu Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010 2
3
WAVE’s Features WAVE has implemented DebateGraph's mapping tool to visualize and facilitate opinions on complex legislation Rate ideas/comments Influence the impact/importance of others’ comments Discussion features within a map (Stream) Groups Create and share a group on a particular topic Develop a map on a specific topic Interact with group members Events Polls Map Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010 3
4
What is eMPOWER? Aims to motivate and strengthen the involvement of NGOs and citizens in the decision-making process on environmental issues at a National and European levels Portugal Italy Greece ePetitioning platform in 4 languages Gathers evidence in order to provide input to decision-makers and make them view policy from the public perspective Bottom-up approach Acts as a stimulus for citizens’ involvement and empowerment www.ep-empower.eu Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010 4
5
eMPOWER’s Features ePetitioning System Different levels of registration/signatures tested Feedback from the users Sharing Views by the users Blogs Forum Groups Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010 5
6
Conclusions Service Supply vs. Service Demand Important & ‘hot’ topics/issues are not always in public ‘demand’ The importance of well-developed tools Easy to use Minimum # of errors in the final version Simple registration process Make it clear to the citizens that a tool plays a direct impact on decisions of policy-makers and policies Involve key politicians/policy-makers Interactivity/Web 2.0 features Marketing, dissemination, PR Treat like a commercial product Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010 6
7
7 THANK YOU! Konrad DWOJAK email: konradd@politech-institute.eu POLITECH INSTITUTE European Center of Political Technologies Address: Saint Bernard, 67 – Brussels B-1060 – Belgium email: info@politech-institute.eu – website: www.politech-institute.eu Public Services 2.0 - Brussels, Belgium - November 16, 2010
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.