1. Risk Management Of High Profile Public Events Tour de France Stage 1 – Canterbury Finish 8 July 2007

2. Tour De France Stage 1 Objectives

3. Tour De France Stage 1 Strategic Risks

4. Tour De France Stage 1 Contractual Relationships Transport For London Opening Ceremony 6 July 2007 Prologue Stage 7 July 2007 First Stage 8 July 2007 Amaury Sport Organisation Tour De France Organisers The Race Kent County Council The Route Crowd Management (Route) Medway Council The Route Crowd Management Canterbury City Council Finish ZoneInnovision Event Organisers (London) Pennine Events Crowd Management (Route) Canterbury High School The Permanence

5. Tour De France Stage 1 Partners Key Partners Kent Highways Transport For London Innovision ASO Police British Transport Police Fire & Rescue Ambulance Service Kent & Canterbury Hospital Other Partners NHS Social Services Pennine Events Mid Kent Water Transco Canterbury High School SuppliersStakeholders Elected Members Residents Local Business Funding Partners Sponsors

6. Tour De France Stage 1 8 July 2007 8 July 2007

7. Tour De France Stage 1 Managing Risk The Key Decisions

8. Tour De France Stage 1 CCC Planning Groups The Finish Line Planning Group AKA – The Bronze Group The Safety Group Commercial Health Manager Project Leader Project Manager Events Manager Health & Safety Officer Risk Management Officer Procurement Officer The Supports Events Group The Stakeholder Group

9. Tour De France Stage 1 Working with Partners

10. Tour De France Stage 1 Risk Assessments

14. Tour De France Stage 1 Emergency Planning

15. Contingency Risks Threatened Terrorist Attack Actual Terrorist Attack (conventional) CBRN Terrorist Attack Gas Leak Gas Explosion Grand Stand collapse Major Fire (near the race route) Air Crash Excessive Heat Overcrowding

16. Tour De France Stage 1 The Day

17. Tour De France Stage 1 The Outcomes

18. Outcomes – Countywide Watched by an estimated two million people along the route £37 million income boost for Kent business (KCC estimate) Ambulance response times maintained

19. Outcomes - Canterbury 81% of residents felt the Tour coming to Canterbury was a good thing only 5% a bad thing – survey by Canterbury Christchurch University 94% of residents were aware that the Tour was coming to Canterbury and most awareness was around road closures and route details – Canterbury Christchurch College University

20. Outcomes - Canterbury 72% of businesses interviewed felt the Tour coming had been a positive thing and only 11% a negative - survey by Canterbury Christchurch University Viewed by an estimated 50,000 people in the Canterbury sector – Kent Police estimates

21. Tour De France Stage 1 Conclusions

22. Conclusions High profile events are high risk.High profile events are high risk. Risk management cannot be a ‘bolt on’.Risk management cannot be a ‘bolt on’. Opportunity to demonstrate the benefits of risk management.Opportunity to demonstrate the benefits of risk management. A danger of ‘overselling’ events can be risk in itself.A danger of ‘overselling’ events can be risk in itself.

23. The End