1. The Report: Its Background and Recommendations

2. The authors  Pamela Andanda – South Africa  Matthias Kaiser – Norway  Carl Mitcham – USA  Linda Nielsen – Denmark  Žaneta Ozoliņa – Latvia  Ren-Zong Qiu – China  Nico Stehr – Germany  Jack Stilgoe - UK

3. What drives global governance of science?  Creeping global agenda – multi-level, multi- dimensional  Pressing national agenda  Intsitutionalism  International regime – laws, codes, norms  Growing networks  Economic pressures – challenges for growth

4. What drives global governance of science?  Transnationalism – innovation, technologies, brain - drain, circulation, bridges  Politics pressure on science and science pressure on politics  Expansion of interdisciplinarity  Science as a common international good  Ethics

5. How the Report approaches global governance?  Global governance is about change  Change of actors  Change of resources  Change of methods  Change of relations (society and science, science and politcs, science and scientists)  Change of priority settings

6. How the Report approaches governance?  Governance - as innovative practices of networks or horizontal forms of interaction, in which actors (political and non-political), arrive at mutually acceptable decisions.  Governance is needed for providing, distributing; regulating

7. Six Recommendations  #1 Within the society of science, ethical governance should be promoted.  #2 Scientists should be encouraged to be self-critical.  #3 Scientists should adopt open access publication protocols.

8. Six Recommendations  #4 ERA research projects should seek ways to enact fundamental human rights.  #5 ERA research should promote critical reflection on the ends as well as the means of science.

9. Six Recommendations  #6 EU should seek opportunities to exercise global leadership in harmonizing the internal and external governance of science across national borders.