1.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

2.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

3.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

4.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

5.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

6.  1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4=.25

7.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4=.25.25 $480,000 = $120,000

8.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

9.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

10.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

11.  3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4=.75

12.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4=.75.75 $480,000 = $360,000

13.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

14.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

15.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

16.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

17.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

18.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

19.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

20.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA : uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

21.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

22.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

23.  1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6

24.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6 1/6 * $480,000 = $80,000

25.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

26.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

27.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

28.  3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60=1/2

29.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60= ½ ½ * $480,000 = $240,000

30.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

31.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

32.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

33.  ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3

34.  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3 1/3 * $480,000 = $160,000

35.  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 =$240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + $160,000 = $400,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent