1. NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN - “LCAP” Culver City Unified School District

2.  An Entirely New Funding and Accountability Model  We Now Have a Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) ; and  Must Develop a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP)  The Local Control Accountability Plan Must Align to:  District Goals; and  Eight (8) State Priority Areas  The Focus is on Student Performance and Eliminating Achievement Gaps  Stakeholder Input is a Critical Element of the Local Accountability Plan BudgetPersonnel Student Achievement

3.  Greatly Simplifies State Funding for Public School Districts Per Student Base Amount Grade Level Demographics (Low income, English Learner, and/or Foster Youth) ADJUSTMENTS $ District Allocation

4.  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is an important component of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).  Under the LCFF all school districts are required to prepare an LCAP, which describes how they intend to meet annual goals for all pupils, with specific emphasis on how they intend to lesson the achievement gap for English Learners, Low Income Students, and Foster Youth. LCAP LCFF LCAP

5. S ECTION 3: A CTIONS, S ERVICES, AND E XPENDITURES S ECTION 2: G OALS AND P ROGRESS INDICATORS S ECTION 1: S TAKEHOLDER E NGAGEMENT

6. Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement A governing board of a school district shall consult with teachers, principals, administrators, other school personnel, local bargaining units of the school district, parents, and pupils in developing a local control and accountability plan. [EC 52060(g)]

7. Parent Advisory Committee Low Income rep Foster Youth rep English Learner rep EL Parent Advisory Committee 15% ELs At least 50 EL pupils Members of pre-existing committees (ELAC/DELAC) can be included in the LCAP EL Parent Advisory Committee. and

8. We Want to Engage Our Stakeholders on How We Can Best Support Student Achievement and Engagement Community Conversations With Stakeholders at school sites Community Conversations With Stakeholders at the district level District Parent Task Force Administrator, teachers, and staff conversations Information on the District Web Site Written Comments/Suggestions On-Line Surveys

9. S ECTION 3: A CTIONS, S ERVICES, AND E XPENDITURES S ECTION 2: G OALS AND P ROGRESS INDICATORS S ECTION 1: S TAKEHOLDER E NGAGEMENT

10. DISTRICT GOALS Local Control Accountability Plan Must Align to These

11. DISTRICT GOALS  Ensuring Student Success  Implementation of Common Core  Facilitating the Development of the Professional Learning Community  A structure and process for what we do when students don’t learn (Question 3).  Being Resourceful and Responsible  All investments align with our fundamental purpose to ensure high levels of learning for ALL students  Build on our culture of needs-based, transparent investment of resources  Partners in advocacy for CCUSD children, staff, and community  Family Engagement, Community and Districts Partnerships are a top priority  Success for All Takes US All  Whole child, whole community  Trusting relationships within Schools and Community

12. EIGHT STATE PRIORITY AREAS Local Control Accountability Plan Must Also Align To These

13. State Priorities

14. State Priorities in the LCAP  Conditions of Learning: o Basics: Teachers appropriately assigned and fully credentialed, student access to standards-aligned instructional materials, and school facilities maintained in good repair (Priority 1) o State Standards: Implementation of state-adopted academic content and performance standards (Priority 2) o Course Access: Student enrollment in a broad course of study (Priority 7)  Conditions of Learning: o Basics: Teachers appropriately assigned and fully credentialed, student access to standards-aligned instructional materials, and school facilities maintained in good repair (Priority 1) o State Standards: Implementation of state-adopted academic content and performance standards (Priority 2) o Course Access: Student enrollment in a broad course of study (Priority 7)

15. State Priorities in the LCAP  Engagement: o Parent Involvement: Efforts to seek parent input in decision making, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special needs subgroups. (Priority 3) o Pupil Engagement: School attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school graduation rates. (Priority 5) o School Climate: Pupil suspension and expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents, and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. (Priority 6)  Engagement: o Parent Involvement: Efforts to seek parent input in decision making, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special needs subgroups. (Priority 3) o Pupil Engagement: School attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school graduation rates. (Priority 5) o School Climate: Pupil suspension and expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents, and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. (Priority 6)

16. State Priorities in the LCAP  Pupil Outcomes: o Pupil Achievement: Student performance on standardized assessments, college and career readiness, English learner reclassification, AP assessments, etc. (Priority 4) o Other Pupil Outcomes: Outcomes for students in other subject areas. (Priority 8)  Pupil Outcomes: o Pupil Achievement: Student performance on standardized assessments, college and career readiness, English learner reclassification, AP assessments, etc. (Priority 4) o Other Pupil Outcomes: Outcomes for students in other subject areas. (Priority 8)

17. S ECTION 3: A CTIONS, S ERVICES, AND E XPENDITURES S ECTION 2: G OALS AND P ROGRESS INDICATORS S ECTION 1: S TAKEHOLDER E NGAGEMENT

18. GOAL SETTING Inform and Communicate Stakeholder Engagement Data analysis and Goal Setting Step 1 January 2014

19. GOAL SETTING Inform and Communicate Stakeholder Engagement Data analysis and Goal Setting Step 1 PROGRAM PLANNING Identify Service Needs Initiate Budget Development Step 2 February- March 2014

20. GOAL SETTING Inform and Communicate Stakeholder Engagement Data analysis and Goal Setting Step 1 January 2014 PROGRAM PLANNING Identify Service Needs Initiate Budget Development Step 2 February –March 2014 ACTION PLANNING Draft LCAP Prepare Budget Step 3 March – May 2014

21. GOAL SETTING Inform and Communicate Stakeholder Engagement Data analysis and Goal Setting Step 1 January 2014 PROGRAM PLANNING Identify Service Needs Initiate Budget Development Step 2 February- March2014 ACTION PLANNING Draft LCAP Prepare Budget Step 3 March – May 2014 ADOPT LCAP AND BUDGET Step 4 June 2014

22.  Focus on Individual Site Feedback  Links to their Single Plan for Student Achievement  The use of guiding principals, where appropriate  Gives sites decision-making opportunity  Provides coordination with other mandated plans  “The Loose”  Providing specificity when necessary  MLC Commitment and expansion  District-wide Support  “The Tight”  The Game Plan  Consider this a working document  Requires modifications and adjustments when necessary  Recognize this is new and pieces may need to be added, revised, adjusted

23. An Exciting Opportunity to Collaborate to Enhance Student Success