Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySimone Meaker Modified over 10 years ago
1
Figure1. Total NO 3 -N leached as influenced by N management during entire 180 day evaluation period. Means within columns followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K-Ratio. AB BC A BC C C
2
Figure 2. Percentage of applied N leached as NO 3 -N as influenced by N management over 180 day period. Means within columns followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K-Ratio A A A
3
Figure 3. Percentage of applied NO 3 -N leached as influenced by N management and month over 180 day evaluation period.
4
Figure 4. Influence of N source on mean dry matter accumulation over 180 day evaluation period. Means within a column followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K-Ratio. A A A
5
Figure 5. Influence of N source on total N uptake during 180 day evaluation period. Means within a column followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K Ratio. A AB A AB AB B
6
Figure 6. Influence of N source on tissue N concentration 180 days after treatment application. Means within columns followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K Ratio. A B A B B B
7
Figure 7. Influence of N source on mean visual quality rating over 180 day evaluation period. Means within a column followed by the same letter do not differ at P<0.05 by Duncan-Waller K Ratio.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.