Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Federal Law (CPSIA, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303, and ASTM F963) California (Proposition 65 and Lead Jewelry Law)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Federal Law (CPSIA, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303, and ASTM F963) California (Proposition 65 and Lead Jewelry Law)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Federal Law (CPSIA, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303, and ASTM F963) California (Proposition 65 and Lead Jewelry Law) Illinois (Lead Poisoning Prevention Act) Child’s painted toy Ban of articles intended for use by children (age not defined) containing > 90 ppm lead by weight in the non volatile portion of paint or surface coating Recent settlements have required that children’s toys comply with the CPSIA Warning required if lead content in paint on a “toy designed for or intended for use by children under the age of 12 at play” is >40 ppm and less than the federal limit (90 ppm) Children’s jewelry with lead in substrate Ban of children’s products (“designed or intended primarily for children 12 years of age or younger”) containing > 300 ppm lead in any component Statutory requirement that certain materials, e.g. plastic and rubber, used in jewelry for children 6 years and under contain < 200 ppm lead Other materials, e.g. metals, printing inks and ceramic glazes were required to contain < 600 ppm lead, but federal law now requires that such components be limited to 300 ppm See also Minnesota Warning required if “total lead content in any component part” of jewelry made for, marketed to, or marketed for use by children under 12 is >40 ppm and less than the federal limit (300 ppm)

2 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Federal Law (CPSIA, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303, and ASTM F963) California (Proposition 65 and Lead Jewelry Law) Illinois (Lead Poisoning Prevention Act) Adult handbag with lead in substrate Not applicableSettlements have required warnings for concentrations greater than:  200 ppm (any fabric in personal carrying products)  300 ppm (in small bags and eyeglass cases) Warning required if a lead bearing substance contains > 600 ppm lead content by total weight Children’s toy with cadmium Ban of "toys" (articles intended for use by children under 14 years of age in play) containing > 75 ppm by weight in the soluble portion of the "surface coating" Recent recall by FAF Inc. of children’s jewelry with cadmium in substrate (sold exclusively at Wal-Mart) Settlements have required warnings for concentrations greater than:  800 ppm for the lip and rim area of ceramic and glass dinnerware  4800 ppm in other exterior areas of ceramic and glass dinnerware  4800 ppm on the outer surface contact area of bike components Not applicable. But see Washington and Oregon law

3 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Ban of articles intended for use by children (age not defined) containing > 90 ppm lead by weight in the non volatile portion of paint or surface coating

4 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Recent settlements have required that children’s toys comply with the CPSIA

5 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Warning required if lead content in paint on a “toy designed for or intended for use by children under the age of 12 at play” is >40 ppm and less than the federal limit (90 ppm)

6 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Ban of children’s products (“designed or intended primarily for children 12 years of age or younger”) containing > 300 ppm lead in any component

7 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Statutory requirement that certain materials, e.g. plastic and rubber, used in jewelry for children 6 years and under contain < 200 ppm lead Other materials, e.g. metals, printing inks and ceramic glazes were required to contain < 600 ppm lead, but federal law now requires that such components be limited to 300 ppm See also Minnesota

8 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Warning required if “total lead content in any component part” of jewelry made for, marketed to, or marketed for use by children under 12 is >40 ppm and less than the federal limit (300 ppm)

9 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Not applicable

10 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Settlements have required warnings for concentrations greater than:  200 ppm (any fabric in personal carrying products) 200 ppm (any fabric in personal carrying products)  300 ppm (in small bags and eyeglass cases) 300 ppm (in small bags and eyeglass cases)

11 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Warning required if a lead bearing substance contains > 600 ppm lead content by total weight

12 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Ban of "toys" (articles intended for use by children under 14 years of age in play) containing > 75 ppm by weight in the soluble portion of the "surface coating" Recent recall by FAF Inc. of children’s jewelry with cadmium in substrate (sold exclusively at Wal- Mart)

13 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Settlements have required warnings for concentrations greater than:  800 ppm for the lip and rim area of ceramic and glass dinnerware 800 ppm for the lip and rim area of ceramic and glass dinnerware  4800 ppm in other exterior areas of ceramic and glass dinnerware 4800 ppm in other exterior areas of ceramic and glass dinnerware  4800 ppm on the outer surface contact area of bike components 4800 ppm on the outer surface contact area of bike components

14 Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Not applicable. But see Washington and Oregon law


Download ppt "Examples of State Laws that Differ from the CPSIA Federal Law (CPSIA, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303, and ASTM F963) California (Proposition 65 and Lead Jewelry Law)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google