Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStacy Dann Modified over 10 years ago
1
Christopher Lawrence SOC 680
2
“Concerted cultivation” (Lareau 2003) The home life to explain educational inequality (Jencks and Phillips (1998) Emphasis on language (Hart and Risley 1995) ◦ Word gap: amount and type Home Observation Measurement of the Environment Home Observation Measurement of the Environment ◦ Becomes popular in 1990s
3
Ethnographic studies ◦ Small samples ◦ Not nationally representative Empirical support for theory of concerted cultivation Showing link to HOME score and years of education attained across categories of race and sex ◦ The “Intellectual Advantage”
4
National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Children and Young Adults (NLSY79 Child/YA) ◦ Offshoot of National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Looked at the unique effects of baby boomers on the labor market NLSY79 Child/YA looks at the children of the mothers Study sample = 2,429 ◦ Measured at two points in time (longitudinal) 1994 (HOME score): Ages 0-14 2010 (Years of Education): Ages 25-38
5
RQ1: Do home environment and education differ by race? RQ2: Do home environment and education differ by sex? RQ3: Do race and sex interact in the effect on home environment and education?
6
Null ◦ H 0 1: The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by race. ◦ H 0 2: The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by sex. ◦ H 0 3: Race and sex will not interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education. Research ◦ H 1 1: The HOME-SF score and years of education will differ by race. ◦ H 1 2: The HOME-SF score and years of education will differ by sex. ◦ H 1 3: Race and sex will interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education.
7
Assumptions ◦ Subjects randomly sampled and independent of one another ( ✓ ) ◦ Multivariate normal distribution ( ✓ ) ◦ Homogeneity of covariance matrices ( ✖ ) ◦ Linearity of dependent variables ( ✓ )
10
Evaluating the hypotheses.hypotheses Reject: ◦ The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by race. ◦ The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by sex Fail to reject: ◦ Race and sex will not interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education
11
Female Intellectual Advantage ◦ Bias in HOME ◦ Lack of father interaction ◦ Genetically more intelligent? ◦ “Feminization of education” ◦ Increase in service sector jobs that require a college education White Intellectual Advantage ◦ Resources and economic background Effects carry on through college Future Research ◦ Add parental education and income as background variables
12
1. Did the study use a sample that was cross- sectional or longitudinal? 2. Was the interaction effect between race and sex significant? 3. Which two groups (e.g., whites, Hispanics, Blacks, males, females) showed the “intellectual advantage?”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.